References
- Bishop C.M. (2006). Introduction. In: M. Jordan, J. Kleinberg, S. Bernhard (eds.), Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning: 1st ed. New York: Springer, pp. 45.
- Cebulla M., Sturzebecher E. & Wernecke K.D. 2000. Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials: Comparison of statistical test in the time and frequency domains. Scand Audiol, 29, 44–51.
- Cebulla M., Sturzebecher E. & Wernecke K.D. 2001. Objective detection of the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR). Audiology, 40(5), 245–252.
- Champlin C.A. 1992. Methods for detecting auditory steady-state potentials recorded from humans. Hear Res, 58, 63–69.
- Connolly J.L., Carron J.D. & Roark S.D. 2005. Universal newborn hearing screening: Are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives?Laryngoscope, 115, 232–236.
- DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M. & Clarke-Pearson D.L. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845.
- Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1993. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 88, 516–524.
- Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1994a. Phase weighting: A method to improve objective detection of steady-state evoked potentials. Hear Res, 79, 94–98.
- Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1994b. Objective detection of 40-Hz auditory evoked potentials: Phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 92, 405–413.
- Elberling C. & Don M. 1984. Quality estimation of auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol, 13, 187–197.
- Hajian-Tilaki K.O., Hanley J.A., Joseph L. & Collet J.P. 1997. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic test. Med Decis Making, 17(1), 94–102.
- Hastie T., Tibshirani R. & Friedman J. 2009. Model Inference and Averaging. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, pp. 261–293.
- Jimenez J., Carballo J., Riera J. & Pérez-Abalo M.C. 1988. Comparación de la eficiencia diagnostica de diferentes medidas de normalidad para el PEATC. Rev. Cub. Ciencias Biológicas, 19, 139–141.
- Mehl A.L. & Thomson V. 1998. Newborn hearing screening. The great omission. Pediatrics, 101, 4.
- Mijares E., Herrera D., Santos E., Gaya J.A., Pérez-Abalo M.C.et al. 2011. Cribado auditivo neonatal con potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 62 (2), 87–94.
- Montgomery D.C. 2008. Simple comparative experiments. In: J. Welter & J. Foxman (eds.) Design and Analysis of Experiments: 7th ed. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 25–27.
- Norton S.J., Gorga M.P. & Widen J.E. 2000. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear, 21, 508–528.
- Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A., Sasha M. & Van Roon. 2001. The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state response. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 1698–1711.
- Picton T.W., Linden R.D., Hamel G. & Maru J.T. 1983. Aspects of averaging. Seminars in Hearing, 4, 324–340.
- Picton T.W., Vajsar J., Rodriguez R. & Campbell K.B. 1987. Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 68, 119–131.
- Savio G., Mijares E., Perez-Abalo M.C., Vega M., Lage C.et al. 2007. Eficiencia de la detección automática de potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias evaluada mediante la metodología ROC. Rev Logop Fon Audiol, 27(1), 12–23.
- Savio G., Pérez-Abalo M.C., Gaya J., Hernández O. & Mijares E. 2006. Test accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady-state responses for target hearing screening. Int J Audiol, 45, 109–120.
- Savio G. & Pérez-Abalo M.C. 2007. The auditory steady-state response: Generation, recording, and clinical application. In: G. Rance(ed.), ASSRs and Hearing Screening. San Diego: Plural Publishing. pp. 185–199.
- Sturzebecher E. & Cebulla M. 1997. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials: Comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain on the basis of near threshold ABR data. Scand Audiol, 26; 7–14.
- Sturzebecher E., Cebulla M. & Wernecke K.D. 1999. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiology Neurotology, 4, 2–11.
- Valdés J.L., Pérez-Abalo M.C., Martín V., Savio G., Sierra C.et al. 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state response. Ear Hear, 18, 420–429.
- Valdés M., Bobes M., Pérez-Abalo M.C., Perera M., Carballo J.A. & Valdés P. 1987. Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory. Audiol, 722, 166–178.
- Victor J.D. & Mast J. 1991. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 78, 378–388.
- Vohr B.R., Carty L.M., Moore P.E. & Letourneau K. 1998. The Rhode Island hearing assessment program: Experience with state-wide hearing screening (1993–1996). Pediatrics, 133, 353–357.