Refractory effects of the N1 event-related potential in experienced cochlear implant patients

References

• Albrecht R., Suchodoletz W. & Uwer R. 2000. The development of auditory evoked dipole source activity from childhood to adulthood. Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 2268–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronoff J.M., Yoon Y.S., Freed D.J. . 2010. The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, EL87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J. & Bates D.M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang, 59, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagiella E., Sloan R.P. & Heitjan D.F. 2000. Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 37, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard D.H. 1997. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis, 10, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley K.A. & Tobey E.A. 2011. Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 32, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E. . 1998. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol, 31, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch D., Skendzel W. & Neville H.J. 2005. Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: An ERP study. Clin Neurophysiol, 116, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowper-Smith C.D., Dingle R.N., Guo Y. . 2010. Synchronous auditory nerve activity in the carboplatin-chinchilla model of auditory neuropathy. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, EL56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniak L.J. 2011. Effect of stimulus intensity on cortical potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu
   Google Scholar
• Debener S., Mullinger K.J., Niazy R.K. . 2008. Properties of the ballistocardiogram artefact as revealed by EEG recordings at 1.5, 3 and 7 T static magnetic field strength. Int J Psychophysiol, 67, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme A. & Makeig S. 2004. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods, 134, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraway J.J. 2006. Extending the Linear Model with R. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick D.C., Kuwada S., Kim D.O. . 1999. Responses of neurons to click-pairs as simulated echoes: Auditory nerve to auditory cortex. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen L.& Picton T. A method for removing cochlear implant artifact. Hear Res, 259, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garadat S.N. & Pfingst B.E. 2011. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users. Hear Res, 275, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates G.A., Cooper J.C. Jr., Kannel W.B. . 1990. Hearing in the elderly: The Framingham cohort, 1983–1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear, 11, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley P.M., Sharma A., Dorman M.F. 2008. Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Brain Res, 1239, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin D.S., Squires K.C., Henderson B.H. . 1978. Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 44, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe U., Rosanowski F., Iro H. . 2001. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol, 30, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Kral A. & Eggermont J.J. 2007. What's to lose and what's to learn: Development under auditory deprivation, cochlear implants and limits of cortical plasticity. Brain Res Rev, 56, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Lomber S.G., Meredith M.A. & Kral A. 2010. Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nat Neurosci, 13, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loquet et al, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L. & Korczak P. 2008. Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman A.J., Tremblay A., Nichols E.S. . (2012). The influence of language proficiency on lexical semantic processing in native and late learners of English. J Cogn Neurosci, 24, 2268–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 2268–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paglialonga A., Fiocchi S., Ravanzzani P. & Tognola G. 2010. Enhancement of neural stochastic firing in cochlear implant stimulation by the addition of noise: A computational study on the influence of stimulation settings and spontaneous activity. Comput Biol Med, 40, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang E.W. & Taylor M.J. 2000. Tracking the development of the N1 from age 3 to adulthood: An examination of speech and non-speech stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 2268–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantev C., Dinnesen A., Ross B. . 2006. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: A longitudinal study. Cereb Cortex, 16, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson N.R., Pisoni D.B., Miyamoto R.T. 2010. Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: Review and assessment of the literature. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 28, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J.C. & Bates D.M. 2000. Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ponton C.W. & Eggermont J.J. 2001. Of kittens and kids: Altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B. . 2000. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: Evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 2268–2276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuben D.B., Walsh K., Moore A.A. . 1998. Hearing loss in community-dwelling older persons: National prevalence data and identification using simple questions. J Am Geriatr Soc, 46, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosburg T., Haueisen J. & Sauer H. 2002. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m. Brain Topogr, 15, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmann P., Kegel A., Eichele T. . 2010. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users. Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmann P., Diller N., Eichele T. . 2012. Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain, 135, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt R., Kaftan H., Hosemann W. . 2005. Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants. Laryngorhinootologie, 84, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A., Dorman M.F. & Kral A. 2005. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res, 203, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A., Gilley P.M., Dorman M.F. . 2007. Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol, 46, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnquist-Uhlen I., Borg E. & Spens K.E. 1995. Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in normal children, with particular reference to the N1 component. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 95, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Viola F.C., Thorne J.D., Bleeck S., Eyles J. & Debener S. 2011. Uncovering auditory evoked potentials from cochlear implant users withi independent components anallysis. Brain and Behav, 48 1470–1480.
   Google Scholar
• Woods D.L. 1995. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, 44, 2268–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Yueh B., Shapiro N., MacLean C. . 2003. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: Scientific review. JAMA, 289, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F., Samy R.N., Anderson J.M. & Houston L. Recovery of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normally-hearing listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F., Anderson J. Samy R. . 2010. The adaptive pattern of the late auditory evoked potential elicited by repeated stimuli in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol, 49, 2268–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar