Hearing-aid use and benefit: A long-term follow-up in patients undergoing surgery for otosclerosis

References

• Aarnisalo A.A., Vasama J.P., Hopsue & Ramsay H. 2003. Long-term hearing results after stapes surgery: A 20-year follow-up. Otol Neurotol, 24, 567–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. 2003. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss: A review. Int J Audiol, 42, S17–S20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S. & Al E. 2007. In: Arlinger S. (ed.) Nordisk Lärobok i Audiologi: First edition. Bromma, CA Tegnér AB. pp.192–195.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S., Brorsson B., Lagerbring C., Leijon A., Rosenhall U. . 2003. Hearing Aids for Adults: Benefit and Costs. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S., Gatehouse S., Bentler R.A., Byrne D., Cox R.M. . 1996. Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization. Ear & Hear, 17, 87S–98S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoli S., Bodmer D. & Probst R. 2010. Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: Association with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing-aid signal processing, and hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 49, 333–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boymans M., Goverts S.T., Kramer S., Festen J.M. & Dreschler W.A. 2008. A prospective multi-center study of the benefits of bilateral hearing aids. Ear Hear, 29, 930–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow N.E. & Day N.E. 1987. Statistical methods in cancer research. IARC Scientific Publications, No 32, Volume II, 131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström J. & Wennerström I. 2010. Hearing-aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia E., Wang J.J., Rochtchina E., Cumming R.R., Newall P. . 2007. Hearing impairment and health-related quality of life: The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Ear Hear, 28, 187–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Hyde M., Gatehouse, S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, S106–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Beyer C.M. 2003. Norms for the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 403–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danermark B. & Gellerstedt L.C. 2004. Psychosocial work environment, hearing impairment, and health. Int J Audiol, 43, 383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A. 2003. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55–74 year-old first time hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 42, S39–S52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declau F., Van Spaendonck M., Timmermans J.P., Michaels L., Liang . 2001. Prevalence of otosclerosis in an unselected series of temporal bones. Otol Neurotol, 22, 596–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ealey M. & Smith R.H. 2010. The genetics of otosclerosis. Hear Res, 266, 70–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson-Mangold M., Erlandsson S. & Jansson G. 1996. The subjective meaning of illness in severe otosclerosis: A descriptive study in three steps based on focus group interviews and written questionnaire. Scand Audiol, 25, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fayers P.M. & Machin D. 2007. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 362–366.
   Google Scholar
• Fisch U. 2009. Stapedotomy versus stapedectomy. 1982. Otol Neurotol, 30, 1160–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuermann H., Kinkel M. & Tchorz J. 2005. Comparison of psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol, 44, 102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L., Clutterbuck S. & Khan A. 2010. Factors associated with hearing-aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA. Int J Audiol, 49, 586–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson A. & Rosenhall U. 1998. Aural rehabilitation in the elderly. Supply of hearing aids related to measured need and self-assessed hearing problems. Scand Audiol, 27, 153–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen L.V., Öberg M., Nielsen C., Naylor G. & Kramer S. 2010. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing-aid uptake, hearing-aid use, and satisfaction with hearing aids: A review of the literature. Trends Amplif, 14, 127–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobler S. & Rosenhall U. 2002. Horizontal localization and speech intelligibility with bilateral and unilateral hearing aid amplification. Int J Audiol, 41, 395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S., Goverts S.T., Dreschler W., Boymans M. & Festen J.M. 2002. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A. 1960. Otosclerosis. A genetic and clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol, S154, 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lundman L., Mendell L., Bagger-Sjoback D. & Rosenhall U. 1999. Hearing in patients operated unilaterally for otosclerosis. Self-assessment of hearing and audiometric results. Acta Otolaryngol, 119, 453–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencher G.T. & Davis A. 2006. Bilateral or unilateral amplification: Is there a difference? A brief tutorial. Int J Audiol, 45, S3–S11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murlow C.D., Aguilar C., Endicott J.E., Tuley M.R., Velez R. . 1990. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med, 113, 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öberg M., Lunner T. & Anderson G. 2007. Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiol Med, 5, 188–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay H., Kärkkäinen J. & Palva T. 1997. Success in surgery for otosclerosis: Hearing improvement and other indicators. Am J Otolaryngol, 18, 23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfors Y.D. & Möller C. 2011. Otoclerosis: Thirty-year follow-up after surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 120, 608–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhall U., Jönsson R. & Söderlind O. 1999. Self-assessed hearing problems in Sweden: A demographic study. Audiology, 38, 328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth G.D. & Hassard T.H. 1986. Hearing aids poststapedectomy: Incidence and timing. Laryngoscope, 96, 385–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the client-oriented scale of improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol, 41, 42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar