628
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of pre-transition stimulus duration on acoustic change complex

, , &
Pages 350-359 | Published online: 23 Jan 2013

References

  • American National Standards Institute. 1996. ANSI S3.6, Specification for Audiometers.
  • Abeles M. & Goldstein M.H. 1972. Responses of single units in the primary auditory cortex of the cat to tones and to tone pairs. Brain Research, 42, 337–352.
  • Burger M., Hoppe U., Lohscheller Eysholdt U. & Dollinger M. 2009. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms. Ear Hear, 30, 1, 16–22.
  • Eggermont J.J., Ponton C.W., Don M., Waring M.D. & Kwong B. 1997. Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 117, 161–163.
  • Etholm B. 1969. Evoked responses in the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate, and auditory cortex by single and double clicks in cats. Acta Otolaryngologica, 67, 319–325.
  • Hassan D.M. 2011. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy. Int J Audiol, 50, 41–49.
  • Hillyard S.A. & Kutas M. 1983. Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annu Rev Psychology, 34, 33–61.
  • Hillyard S.A. & Picton T.W. 1978. On and off components in the auditory evoked potentials. Percept Psychophys, 24, 391–398.
  • Jones S.J., Longe O. & Pato M.V. 1998. Auditory evoked potential to abrupt pitch and timbre changes of complex tones: Electrophysiological evidence of ‘streaming’?Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 131–142.
  • Jordan K., Schmidt A., Plotz K., von Specht H., Begall K. et al. 1997. Auditory event-related potentials in post-and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. American Journal of Otology, 18(6), S116–S117.
  • Kaukoranta E., Hari R. & Lounasmaa O.V. 1987. Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants. Exp Brain Research, 69, 19–23.
  • Kraus N., Bradlow A.R., Cheatham M.A., Cunningham J., King C.D. et al. 2000. Consequences of neural asynchrony: A case of auditory neuropathy. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 1, 33–45.
  • Lendra M., Friesen & Kelly L. 2006. Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, 27, 678–685.
  • Martin B.A. & Boothroyd A. 2000. Cortical, auditory evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am, 107 (4), 2155–2161.
  • Martin B.A. & Boothroyd A. 1999. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same speech envelope. Ear Hear, 20 (1), 33–44.
  • Merzenich M.M., Knight P.L. & Roth G.L. 1975. Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. J Neurophysiol, 38, 231–241.
  • Naatanen R. & Picton T. 1987. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375–425.
  • Ostroff J.M., Martin B.A. & Boothroyd A. 1998. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear, 19 (4), 290–297.
  • Pantev C., Ross B., Fujioka T., Trainor L.J., Schulte M. et al. 2003. Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 438–450.
  • Picton T.W., Alain C & Otten L 2000. Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootology, 5, 111–139.
  • Reale R.A. & Imig T.J. 1980. Tonotopic organization in auditory cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol, 192, 265–291.
  • Sharma A., Dorman M.F. & Spahr A.J. 2002. Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation. Neuroreport, 13, 1365–1368.
  • Stevens S.S. & Davis H. 1938. Hearing: Its Psychology and Physiology. New York: Wiley.
  • Tremblay K.L., Friesen L., Martin B.A. & Wright R. 2003. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear, 24 (3), 225–232.
  • Tremblay K.L., Billings C.J., Friesen L.M. & Souza P.E. 2006. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear, 27, 93–103.
  • Whiting K.A., Martin B.A. & Stapells D.R. 1998. The effect of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear Hear, 19, 218–231.
  • Yingling C.D. & Nethercut G.E. 1983. Evoked responses to frequency shifted tones: Tonotopic and contextual determinants. Int J Neurosci, 22, 107–118.
  • Zen F.G., Kon Y.Y., Michalewski H.J. & Starr A. 2005. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol, 93, 3050–63.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.