Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: Potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow

References

• Ahissar M. 2007. Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends Cogn Sci, 11, 458–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair J.C. 1977. Effects of amplification, speechreading, and classroom environments on reception of speech. Volta Rev, 79, 443–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boets B., Vandermosten M., Poelmans H., Luts H., Wouters J. et al. 2011. Preschool impairments in auditory processing and speech perception uniquely predict future reading problems. Res Dev Disabil, 32, 560–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. 2010. Adapting to changed hearing: The potential role of formal training. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 601–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady S., Shankweiler D. & Mann V. 1983. Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. J Exp Child Psychol, 35, 345–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell R. 2000. Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT): Third Edition. Novato, California: Academic Therapy Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Buss E., Pillsbury H.C., Buchman C. A., Pillsbury C.H., Clark M.S. et al. 2008. Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: Speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear, 29, 20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell A. & Nittrouer S. 2013. Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res,56, 13–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., van Wanrooy E., Dillon H. & Carter L. 2011. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell C.C. 1993. Speech recognition in noise by children with minimal degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 14, 210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culling J.F., Jelfs S., Talbert A., Grange J.A. & Backhouse S.S. 2012. The benefit of bilateral vs. unilateral cochlear implantation to speech intelligibility in noise. Ear Hear, 33, 673–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L.S., Geers A.E., Blamey P.J., Tobey E.A. & Brenner C.A. 2011. Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 32, 19S–26S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn C.C., Tyler R.S., Oakley S., Gantz B.J. & Noble W. 2008. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation. Ear Hear, 29, 352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay R.C. & Schuchman G.I. 1976. Masking level difference for speech: Effects of ear dominance and age. Audiology, 15, 232–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finitzo-Hieber T. 1981. Classroom acoustics. In: R.J. Roeser & M.P. Downs (eds.) Auditory Disorders in School Children. New York: Thieme-Stratton Inc., pp. 250–262.
   Google Scholar
• Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V. & Wang X. 1998. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3586–3596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garadat S.N. & Litovsky R.Y. 2007. Speech intelligibility in free field: Spatial unmasking in preschool children. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 1047–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazrati O. & Loizou P.C. 2012. The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. Int J Audiol, 51, 437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone P.M. & Litovsky R.Y. 2006. Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2177–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh T., Kei J., Driscoll C. & Khan A. 2010. Children with minimal conductive hearing impairment: Speech comprehension in noise. Audiol Neurootol, 15, 27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D., Hoover B., Choi S. & Stelmachowicz P. 2010. Relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological awareness skills for children with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 31, 761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J. & Sammeth C. 2006. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear, 27, 714–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y. 2005. Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3091–3099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Boothroyd A. & Minniear D. 2001. Evaluation of the computer-assisted speech perception assessment test (CASPA). J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 390–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markides A. 1986. Speech levels and speech-to-noise ratios. Br J Audiol, 20, 115–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marks L.E. 1978. Binaural summation of loudness of pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 64, 107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misurelli S.M. & Litovsky R.Y. 2012. Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: Effect of interferer asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok M., Galvin K.L., Dowell R.C. & McKay C.M. 2010. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol, 15, 44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller J., Schön F. & Helms J. 2002. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 23, 198–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman A.C., Wroblewski M., Hajicek J. & Rubinstein A. 2010. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Ear Hear, 31, 336–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. 1999. Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems?J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 925–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. 2010. Early Development of Children with Hearing Loss. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Boothroyd A. 1990. Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2705–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Burton L. 2002. The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and language processing abilities in children with hearing loss. Volta Rev, 103, 5–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Burton L.T. 2005. The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and phonological processing abilities: Evidence from 5-year-olds with histories of otitis media with effusion and low socioeconomic status. J Commun Disord, 38, 29–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S., Caldwell A., Lowenstein J.H., Tarr E. & Holloman C. 2012. Emergent literacy in kindergartners with cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 33, 683–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Miller M.E. 1999. The development of phonemic coding strategies for serial recall. Appl Psycholinguist, 20, 563–588.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S., Shune S. & Lowenstein J.H. 2011. What is the deficit in phonological processing deficits: Auditory sensitivity, masking, or category formation?J Exp Child Psychol, 108, 762–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papso C.F. & Blood I.M. 1989. Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise. Ear Hear, 10, 235–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters B.R., Litovsky R., Parkinson A. & Lake J. 2007. Importance of age and post-implantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 28, 649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard M. & Bradley J. S. 2001. Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. Audiology, 40, 221–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roid G.H. & Miller L.J. 2002. Leiter International Performance Scale – Revised (Leiter-R). Wood Dale, Illinois: Stoelting Co.
   Google Scholar
• Saripella R., Loizou P.C., Thibodeau L. & Alford J.A. 2011. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 3028–3037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer E.C., Beeler S., Ramos H., Morais M., Monzingo J. et al. 2012. Developmental effects and spatial hearing in young children with normal-hearing sensitivity. Ear Hear, 33, e32–e43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich P., Nopp P. & D’Haese P. 2004. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 25, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serniclaes W., Ventura P., Morais J. & Kolinsky R. 2005. Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults. Cognition, 98, B35–B44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich K.E., Cunningham A.E. & Cramer B.B. 1984. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. J Exp Child Psychol, 38, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Gantz B.J., Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Parkinson A.J. et al. 2002. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 23, 80S–89S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente D.L., Plevinsky H.M., Franco J.M., Heinrichs-Graham E.C. & Lewis D.E. 2012. Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 232–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2010. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 31, 702–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R.J. & Tyler R.S. 2003. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1617–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance M. & Martindale N. 2011. Assessing speech perception in children with language difficulties: Effects of background noise and phonetic contrast. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 14, 48–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venetjoki N., Kaarlela-Tuomaala A., Keskinen E. & Hongisto V. 2006. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49, 1068–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar