Simulating psychophysical tuning curves in listeners with dead regions

References

• Alcántara J.I. & Moore B.C.J. 2000. A psychoacoustic measure of level-dependent shifts in maximum cochlear excitation. Br J Audiol, 34 (2), 105–105.
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J. & Kluk K. 2002. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 112 (3), 1133–1144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dau T., Püschel D. & Kohlrausch A. 1996a. A quantitative model of the effective signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 3615–3622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Püschel D. & Kohlrausch A. 1996b. A quantitative model of the effective signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 3623–3631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B. & Kohlrausch A. 1997a. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2892–2905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B. & Kohlrausch A. 1997b. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2906–2919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derleth R.P. & Dau T. 2000. On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 285–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huss M. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Dead regions and noisiness of pure tones. Int J Audiol, 44, 599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen M.L., Ewert S.D. & Dau T. 2008. A computational model of the human auditory signal processing and perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 124 (1), 422–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jepsen M.L. & Dau T. 2011. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 129 (1), 262–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson-Davies D. & Patterson R.D. 1979. Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal region. J Acoust Soc Am, 65, 765–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res, 200, 115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49 (2), 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman M.C. & Dodds W. 1984. Single-neuron labelling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates. Hear Res, 16, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda E.A. & Meddis R. 2001. A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 3107–3118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Kapadia S., Munro K.J. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Modification of the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test for cochlear dead regions for use with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 45, 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Nasr-Addine H., Colin C., Hoonhorst I., Collet G. et al. 2009. Effect of presentation level on diagnosis of dead regions using the threshold equalizing noise test. Int J Audiol, 48, 55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddis R., O’Mard L.P. & Lopez-Poveda E.A. 2001. A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 2852–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B.R. 1997. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Aud Neurosci, 3, 289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R. & Alcántara J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Brit J Audiol, 34, 205–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2001. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5 (1), 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Alcántara J.I. 2001. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear, 22, 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B.R. 2004. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res, 188, 70–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. & Stone M.A. 2004. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear, 25, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin B.J. & Moore B.C.J. 1981. Off-frequency listening: Effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 1119–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D. & Nimmo-Smith I. 1980. Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am, 67 (1), 229–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D.L. & Milroy R. 1982. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 72 (6), 1788–1803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plack C.J. & Oxenham A.J. 1998. Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 103 (3), 1598–1608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plack C.J., Oxenham A.J. & Drga V. 2002. Linear and nonlinear processes in temporal masking. Acust Acta Acust, 88, 348–358.
   Google Scholar
• Püschel D. 1988. Prinzipien der zeitlichen Analyse beim Hören, Principles of Temporal Processing in Hearing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Robles L. & Ruggero M.A. 2001. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Phys Rev, 81 (3), 1305–1352.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. 1992. Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2, 449–456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. & Robles L. 1997. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101 (4), 2151–2163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sek A., Alcántara J.I., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. & Wicher A. 2005. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 44, 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Molis M.R., Müsch H., Walden B.E. Surr R.K. et al. 2003. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: Psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear, 24, 133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Burns E.M. & Nelson D.A. 1983. Pure-tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 966–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J. & Baer T. 2001. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 110 (2), 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnaar B. & Dreschler W.A. 2012. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification. Int J Audiol, 51(6), 456–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar