Ipsi- and contralateral interaction in the 40 Hz auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) with two carriers at 60 dB SPL

References

• ANSI 1969. Specifications for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York, S3. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Artieda J., Valencia M., Alegre M., Olaziregi O., Urrestarazu E. et al. 2004. Potentials evoked by chirp-modulated tones: A new technique to evaluate oscillatory activity in the auditory pathway. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 699–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat S.P. 2008. The effects of monotic and dichotic interference tones on 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 101–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohórquez J. & Özdamar Ö. 2008. Generation of the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 2598–2607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G. & Ming W.J. 2002. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 173–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van Roon P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J. et al. 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 205–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1996. A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 2236–2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin W.F. & Mountain D.C. 1993. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 3215–3226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draganova R., Ross B., Borgmann C. & Pantev C. 2002. Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear Hear, 23, 254–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S. & Talmachoff P.J. 1981. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA, 78, 2643–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R. & Makeig S. 1992a. Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40 Hz steady-state response. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 2683–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R. & Makeig S. 1992b. Physiological studies of central masking in man. II: Tonepip SSRs and the masking level difference. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 2691–2697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschalk A., Mase R., Roth R., Ille N., Rupp A. et al. 1999. Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin Neurophysiol, 110, 856–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari R., Haemaelaeinen M. & Joursiniemi S.L. 1989. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.R. 2001. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol, 30, 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M. et al. 2002a. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr, 15, 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Picton T.W. & Stapells D.R. 2002b. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady state responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1569–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.R. 2003. Auditory steady state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol, 42, 2373–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ishida I.M. & Stapells D.R. 2009. Does the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?Ear Hear, 30, 7133–715.
   Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L. & Picton T.W. 1998. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 83–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohlrausch A., Fassel R. & Dau T. 2000. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 7233–734.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Batra R. & Maher V.L. 1986. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res, 21, 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R., Campbell K., Hamel G. & Picton T.W. 1985. Electrophysiological techniques in audiology and otology: Human auditory steady-state evoked-potentials during sleep. Ear Hear, 6, 167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G. & Picton T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 420–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton P.E., Picton T.W., Champagne S.C. & Durieux-Smith A. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3051–3063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C. et al. 1996. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. J Am Aud Soc, 17, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Luts H., Desloovere C., Kumar A., Vandermeersch E. & Wouters J. 2004. Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 915–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö. & Kraus N. 1983. Auditory middle-latency responses in humans. Audiology, 22, 34–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö. & Bohόquez . 2008. Suppression of the Pb (P1) component of the auditory middle-latency response with contralateral masking. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 1870–1880.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E. et al. 2001. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 22, 200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitot C., Collet L. & Durrant J.D. 2005. Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR): Effects of modulation and carrier frequencies. Int J Audiol, 44, 567–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krausz H.I. & Galambos R. 1974. Human auditory evoked potentials. I: Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 36, 179190.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Skinner C., Champagne S., Kellet A. & Maiste A. 1987. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 165–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Purcell D.W. & Plourde G. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses: The effects of recording technique and state of arousal. Anesth Analg, 97, 1396–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G., Stapells D.R. & Picton T.W. 1991. The human auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 491, 153–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees A., Green G. & Kay R. 1986. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res, 23, 123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan M.P. & Regan D. 1993. Nonlinear terms produced by passing amplitude-modulated sinusoids through a hair cell transducer function. Biol Cybern, 69, 439–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan M.P. 1994. Linear half-wave rectification of modulated sinusoids. Appl Math Comput, 62, 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel H., Granzow M. & Kollmeier B. 2001. Single-sweep-based methods to improve the quality of auditory brain stem responses. Part II: Averaging methods. Z Audiol, 40, 62–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ross B., Borgmann C., Draganova R., Roberts L. & Pantev C. 2000. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 679–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Picton T.W. & Pantev C. 2002. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear Res, 165, 68–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Draganova R., Picton T.W. & Pantev C. 2003. Frequency specificity of 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res, 186, 57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B. & Pantev C. 2004. Auditory steady-state responses reveal amplitude modulation gap detection thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 2193–2206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross B., Herdman A.T. & Pantev C. 2005. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Cereb Cortex, 15, 2029–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarelli R. & Conti G. 1999. Generation of auditory steady-state responses: Linearity assessment. Scand Audiol Suppl, 51, 23–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shofner W.P., Sheft S. & Guzman S.J. 1996. Responses of ventral cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to amplitude modulation by low-frequency, two-tone complexes. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 3592–3605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Galambos R., Costello J.A. & Makeig S. 1988. Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 71, 289–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valdes J.L., Perez-Abalo M.C. Martin V., Savio G., Sierra C. et al. 1997. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 18, 420–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Reijden C.S., Mens L.H.M. & Snik A.F.M. 2006. Frequency-specific objective audiometry: Tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli. Int J Audiol, 45, 40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol, 44, 613–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N.F. 1979. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1364–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong W.Y. & Stapells D.R. 2004. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: An auditory steady-state response study. Ear Hear, 25 57–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar