Assessment of auditory processing disorder in children using an adaptive filtered speech test

References

• Ardoint M. & Lorenzi C. 2010. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues. Hear Res, 260, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2005. Technical report: (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders. Working Group on Auditory Processing Disorders. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/TR2005-00043.html
   Google Scholar
• Baran J.A. & Musiek F.E. 1999. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In: F.E. Musiek & W.F. Rintelmann (eds.) Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 375–413.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis T.J. 2003. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting. From Science to Practice (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, USA: Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein S.P., Wilson R.H. & Cambron N.K. 1994. Low- and high-pass filtered Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 for monaural and binaural evaluation. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 259–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacace A.T. & McFarland D.J. 2005. The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol, 14, 112–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dempsey C. 1977. Some thoughts concerning alternate explanations of central auditory test results. In: R.W. Keith (ed.). Central Auditory Dysfunction. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey C. 1983. Selecting tests of auditory function in children. In: E.Z. Lasky & J. Katz (eds.). Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Problems of Speech, Language and Learning. Austin: Pro-Ed, pp. 203–221.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., Cameron S., Glyde H., Wilson W. & Tomlin D. 2012. An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L.L. & Katz D. 1980. Development of a new children's test of speech discrimination (technical manual). St. Louis, USA: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer S.M. & Keith R.W. 1981. Filtered word testing in the assessment of children's central auditory abilities. Ear Hear2, 267–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley D.E.H., Hill P.R. & Moore D.R. 2003. The auditory basis of language impairments: Temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 67, S137–S142.
   Google Scholar
• Kaernbach C. 1991. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted updown method. Percept & Psychophys, 49, 227–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith R. & Anderson J. 2007. Dichotic listening tests. In: F.E. Musiek & G.D. Chermak (eds.). Handbook of (central) Auditory Processing Disorder. Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis. San Diego: Plural Publishing, pp. 207–230.
   Google Scholar
• Keith R.W. 2000. Development and standardization of SCAN-C Test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 438–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith R.W. 2000. Random Gap Detection Test. St Louis, USA: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Keith R.W. 2000. Scan-C Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children - Revised. San Antonio, USA: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly A. 2007. Normative data for behavioural tests of auditory processing for New Zealand school children aged 7 to 12 years. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 29, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Leek M. 2001. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept & Psychophys, 63, 1279–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo J.H., Bamiou D.E. & Rosen S. 2013. The impacts of language background and language-related disorders in auditory processing assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F.N. & Clark J.G. 1977. Audiologic detection of auditory processing in children. J Am Audiol Soc, 3, 140–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGaffin A. 2007. Development of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test for the identification of central auditory processing disorder. Unpublished Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ, http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1504.
   Google Scholar
• Mody M., Studdert-Kennedy M. & Brady S. 1997. Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D.R. 2006. Auditory processing disorder (APD): Definition, diagnosis, neural basis, and intervention. Audiol Med, 4, 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Moore D.R., Ferguson M.A., Edmondson-Jones A.M., Ratib S. & Riley A. 2010. Nature of auditory processing disorder in children. Pediatrics, 126, e382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D.R., Halliday L.F. & Amitay S. 2009. Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 364, 409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D.R., Rosen S., Bamiou D.E., Campbell N.G. & Sirimanna T. 2013. Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): A British Society of Audiology APD special interest group ʽwhite paper’. Int J Audiol, 52, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. 1994. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 265–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Bellis T.J. & Chermak G.D. 2005. Nonmodularity of the central auditory nervous system: implications for (central) auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol, 14, 128–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F.E. & Chermak G.D. 2007. Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder. Auditory neuroscience and diagnosis. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Audiological Society. 2008. Best Practice Guidelines. New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• O'Beirne G.A., McGaffin A.J. & Rickard N.A. 2012. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 777–782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M. & Souza P. 2003. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int J Audiol, 42, 2S11–12S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawood V.W. 2006. A temporal processing primer. Part 1. Defining key concepts in temporal processing. Hearing Review, 13, 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen S. 2003. Auditory processing in dyslexia and specific language impairment: Is there a deficit? What is its nature? Does it explain anything?. J Phon, 31, 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J. & Ekelid M. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M., Purdy S.C. & Kelly A.S. 2009. Comorbidity of auditory processing, language, and reading disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 706–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sincock B.P. 2008. Clinical applicability of adaptive speech testing: A comparison of the administration time, accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of adaptive speech tests with conventional speech audiometry. Unpublished Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ, http://hdl.handle.net/10092/2157
   Google Scholar
• Souza P., Arehart K., Miller C.W. & Muralimanohar R.K. 2011. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing. Ear Hear, 32, 75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallal P., Miller S., Jenkins B. & Merzenich M. 1997. The role of temporal processing in developmental language-based learning disorders: Research and clinical implications. In: B. Blachman (ed.) Cognitive and Linguistic Foundations of Reading Acquisition and Dyslexia. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum, pp. 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• van Wieringen A. & Pohls L.C.W. 1995. Discrimination of single and complex consonant-vowel- and vowel-consonant-like formant transitions. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 1304–1312.
   Google Scholar
• Willeford J.A. 1977. Assessing central auditory behaviour in children: A test battery approach. In: R.W. Keith (ed.) Central Auditory Dysfunction. New York: Grune and Stratton, pp. 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson W.J. & Arnott W. 2013. Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorder: How big a difference does it make?. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L., Thompson C.S. & Pfingst B.E. 2005. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3255–3267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zera J. 2004. Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum- likelihood procedures. Speech Communication, 42, 313.
   Google Scholar