376
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Hearing-aid users’ voices: A factor that could affect directional benefit

, &
Pages 789-794 | Received 21 Oct 2012, Accepted 01 May 2013, Published online: 18 Jun 2013

References

  • American National Standards Institute. 2010. Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6). New York: ANSI.
  • Bentler R.A. 2005. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 473–484.
  • Bentler R.A., Palmer C. & Dittberner A.B. 2004. Hearing-in-noise: Comparison of listeners with normal and (aided) impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 216–225.
  • Chalupper J., Wu Y.H. & Weber J. 2011. New algorithm automatically adjusts directional system for special situations. Hear J, 64, 26–33.
  • Cord M.T., Surr R.K., Walden B.E. & Dyrlund O. 2004. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 353–364.
  • Cord M.T., Surr R.K., Walden B.E. & Olson L. 2002. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 295–307.
  • Dillon H. 1999. NAL-NL-1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for nonlinear hearing aids. Hear J, 52, 10–16.
  • Gnewikow D., Ricketts T., Bratt G.W. & Mutchler L.C. 2009. Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. J Rehab Res Dev, 46, 603–618.
  • Hällgren M., Larsby B. & Arlinger S. 2006A Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 45, 227–237.
  • Humes L.E., Ahlstrom J.B., Bratt G.W. & Peek B.F. 2009. Studies of hearing-aid outcome measures in older adults: A comparison of technologies and an examination of individual differences. Seminars in Hearing, 30, 112–128.
  • Kochkin S. 2007. MarkeTrak VII: Obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aids. Hear J, 60 (4), 24–50.
  • Kuk F. & Keenan D. 2012. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone. J Am Acad Audio, 23, 64–73.
  • Mueller H.G., Weber J. & Bellanova M. 2011. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern. Int J Audiol, 50, 249–254.
  • Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
  • Palmer C., Bentler R.A. & Meuller H.G. 2006. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 190–201.
  • Preves D.A., Sammeth C.A. & Wynne M.K. 1999. Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 273–284.
  • Ricketts T. & Henry P. 2002. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional- microphone hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 41, 100–112.
  • Ricketts T., Henry P. & Gnewikow D. 2003. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear, 24, 424–439.
  • Stuermann B. 2011. Auto ZoomControl: Objective and subjective benefits with auto ZoomControl. Retrieved April 23rd, 2013, from http://www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonak/b2b/C_M_tools/Library/Field_Study_News/en/FSN_auto_ZoomControl_benefits_210x297_EN_V1.00_2011-01.pdf
  • Takahashi G., Martinez C.D., Beamer S., Bridges J., Noffsinger D. et al. 2007. Subjective measures of hearing-aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 323–349.
  • Walden B.E., Surr R.K., Cord M.T., Edwards B. & Olson L. 2000. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing-aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 540–560.
  • Walden B.E., Surr R.K., Grant K.W., Van Summers W., Cord M.T. et al. 2005. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 662–676.
  • Wu Y.H. 2010. Effect of age on directional microphone hearing-aid benefit and preference. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 78–89.
  • Wu Y.H. & Bentler R.A. 2010a. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I: Laboratory tests. Ear Hear, 31, 22–34.
  • Wu Y.H. & Bentler R.A. 2010b. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II: Field tests. Ear Hear, 31, 35–46.
  • Wu Y.H. & Bentler R.A. 2011. A method to measure hearing-aid directivity index and polar pattern in small and reverberant enclosures. Int J Audiol, 50, 405–416.
  • Wu Y.H. & Bentler R.A. 2012. Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing? Am Acad Audiol, 23, 697–711.
  • Wu Y.H., Stangl E., Bentler R.A., Stanziola R.W. 2013. The effect of hearing-aid technologies on listening in an automobile. J Am Acad Audiol. 24, 474–485.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.