A systematic review of electrophysiological outcomes following auditory training in school-age children with auditory processing deficits

References

• AAA 2010. American Academy of Audiology clinical practice guidelines: Diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder [online]. Available: http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/CAPD%20Guidelines%208–2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S. & Kraus N. 2010. Rapid acoustic processing in the auditory brainstem is not related to cortical asymmetry for the syllable rate of speech. Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 1343–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso R. & Schochat E. 2009. The efficacy of formal auditory training in children with (central) auditory processing disorder: Behavioural and electrophysiological evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 75, 726–732.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASHA 1996. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol, 5, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA 2005. (Central) auditory processing disorders. Available at http://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00043.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis T.J. 2002. Developing deficit-specific intervention plans for individuals with auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear, 23, 287–295.
   Google Scholar
• Bellis T.J. 2003. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice. San Diego, USA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• BSA 2011. Position statement: Auditory processing disorder (APD). Available: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/docs/docsfromold/BSA_APD_PositionPaper_31March11_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell T.D., Bradlow A.R., Nicol T.G., Koch D.B. & Kraus N. 1999. Interactive software for evaluating auditory discrimination. Ear Hear, 20, 175–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 1997. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego, USA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 2002. Auditory training: Principles and approaches for remediating and managing auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear, 23, 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry R. 1980. Selective Auditory Attention Test (SAAT). St Louis, USA: Auditec of St Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Cognitive Concepts 1997. Earobics: Auditory Development and Phonics Program [computer software]. Cambridge, USA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford J. & Garthwaite P.H. 2002. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey M.E., Richard G.J., Geffner D., Kamhi A.G., Medwetsky L. et al. 2011. Auditory processing disorders and auditory/language interventions: An evidence-based systematic review. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 246–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal K.V., Daily C.S. & Kao K. 2002. Auditory brainstem responses to regular and high stimulus repetition rates in children at risk for central auditory processing disorders. J Audiol Med, 11, 146–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes E.A., Warrier C.M., Nicol T.G., Zecker S.G. & Kraus N. 2003. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophysiol, 114, 673–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J. & Jerger S. 1984. The Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test (PSI). St. Louis, USA: Auditec of St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Jirsa R.E. 1992. The clinical utility of the P3 AERP in children with auditory processing disorders. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 903–912.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jirsa R.E. 2002. Clinical efficacy of electrophysiologic measures in APD management programs. Sem Hear, 23, 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K.L., Nicol T.G. & Kraus N. 2005. Brain stem response to speech: A biological marker of auditory processing. Ear Hear, 26, 424–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. 1968. The SSW test: an interim report. J Speech Hear Disord, 33, 132–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. 1994. Two important additions to the SSW test. SSW Reports, 16, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Katz J., Basil R.A. & Smith J.M. 1963. A staggered spondaic word test for detecting central auditory lesions. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn, 72, 908–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. & Fletcher, C. 1998. Phonemic Synthesis Test. Vancouver, WA: Precision Acoustics.
   Google Scholar
• Loo J.H.Y., Bamiou D.E., Campbell N. & Luxon L.M. 2010. Computer-based auditory training (CBAT): Benefits for children with language- and reading-related learning difficulties. Dev Med Child Neurol, 52, 708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur G.M. 2009. Auditory processing disorders: Can they be treated?Curr Opin Neurol, 22, 137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur G.M., Atkinson C.M. & Ellis D. 2010. Can training normalize atypical passive auditory ERPs in children with SRD or SLI?Dev Neuropsychol, 35, 656–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur G.M., Ellis D., Atkinson C.M. & Coltheart M. 2008. Auditory processing deficits in children with reading and language impairments: Can they (and should they) be treated?Cognition, 107, 946–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medwetsky L. 2011. Spoken language processing model: Bridging auditory and language processing to guide assessment and intervention. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 286–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D.R., Rosen S., Bamiou D., Campbell N.G. & Sirimanna T. 2013. Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): A British Society of Audiology APD Special Interest Group “white paper”. Int J Audiol, 52, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Baran J.A. & Schochat E. 1999. Selected management approaches to central auditory processing disorders. Scand Audiol, 51, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Chermak G.D. & Weihing J. 2007. Auditory training. In: G.D. Chermak & F.E. Musiek (eds.). Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Comprehensive Intervention. (Vol. 2), Plural Publishing, pp. 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. & Schochat E. 1998. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear, 19, 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Needleman I. 2003. Introduction to evidence based dentistry. In: J. Clarkson, J.E. Harrison, A.I. Ismail, I. Needleman & H. Worthington (eds.) Evidence Based Dentistry for Effective Practice. London: Martin Dunitz, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol T. & Kraus N. 2005. How can the neural encoding and perception of speech be improved? In: J. Syka & M.M. Merzenich (eds.) Plasticity and Signal Representation in the Auditory System. New York: Kluwer Plenum, pp. 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy T.K. 2000. Electrophysiologic assessment of CAPD: A review of the basics. The Hearing Journal, 53, 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira L.D. & Schochat E. 1997. Processamento Auditivo Central: Manual de Avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise.
   Google Scholar
• Russo N.M., Nicol T.G., Zecker S.G., Hayes E.A. & Kraus N. 2005. Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behavioural Brain Research, 156, 95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochat E., Musiek F.E., Alonso R. & Ogata J. 2010. Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder. Braz J Med Biol Res, 43, 777–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Learning Corporation 1998. Fast ForWord [computer software]. Berkeley, USA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M.M. & Creelman C.D. 1967. Pest: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J Acoust Soc Am, 41, 782–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K.L. 2007. Training-related changes in the brain: Evidence from human-auditory-evoked potentials. Sem Hear, 28, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Warrier C.M., Johnson K.L., Hayes E.A., Nicol T. & Kraus N. 2004. Learning-impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise. Exp Brain Res, 157, 431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willeford J. 1977. Assessing central auditory behaviour in children: A test battery approach. In: R.W. Keith (ed.) Central Auditory Dysfunction. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson W.J. & Arnott W. 2012. Evidence about the effectiveness of interventions for auditory processing disorder. In: L. Wong & L. Hickson (eds.), Evidence-based Practice in Audiology: Evaluating Interventions for Children and Adults with Hearing Impairment: Plural Publishing, pp. 283–308.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson W.J. & Arnott W. 2013. Using different criteria to diagnose (C)APD: How big a difference does it make?J Speech Lang Hear R, 56, 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock R. & Johnson M. 1989. Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-educational Battery-revised: Tests of Cognitive Ability. Allen, USA: DLM Teaching Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Yencer K.A. 1998. Clinical focus: Grand rounder. The effects of auditory integration training for children with central auditory processing disorders. Am J Audiol, 7, 32–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar