Cochlear implantation for a child with cochlear nerve deficiency: Parental perspectives explored through narrative

References

• Adunka O., Jewells V. & Buchman C. 2007. Value of computed tomography in the evaluation of children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol, 28, 597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostou F., Graham J. & Crocker S. 2007. A preliminary study looking at parental emotions following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int, 8, 68–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archbold S., Sach T., O’Neill C., Lutman M. & Gregory S. 2006. Deciding to have a cochlear implant and subsequent after-care: Parental perspectives. Deaf Educ Int, 8, 190–206.
   Google Scholar
• Balkany T.J., Hodges A.V., Eshraghi A.A., Butts S., Bricker K. et al. 2002. Cochlear implants in children: A review. Acta Otolaryngol, 122, 356–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrame M.A., Frau G.N., Shanks M., Robinson P. & Anderson I. 2005. Double posterior labyrinthotomy technique: Results in three Med-El patients with common cavity. Otol Neurotol, 26, 177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley J., Beale T. & Graham J. 2008. Variable long-term outcomes from cochlear implantation in children with hypoplastic auditory nerves. Cochlear Implants Int, 9, 34–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchman C.A., Teagle H.F.B., Roush P., Park L.R., Hatch D. et al. 2011. Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: Implications for auditory brainstem implantation. Laryngoscope, 121, 1979–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calmels M., Saliba I., Wanna G., Cochard N., Fillaux J. et al. 2004. Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 347–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan J. 2009. Parental readiness for cochlear implant decision-making. Cochlear Implants Int, 10(S1), 38–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisikovits Z. & Koren C. 2010. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qual Health Res, 20, 1642–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian J. 2003. As candidacy criteria loosen up, use of cochlear implants grows rapidly. Hear J, 56, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Francis H.W. & Niparko J.K. 2003. Cochlear implantation update. Pediatr Clin N Am, 50, 341–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers A.E., Nicholas J.G. & Sedey A.L. 2003. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear, 24, 46S–58S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K.A., Twitchell K.A., Papsin B.C. & Harrison R.V. 2001. Effect of residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation on speech perception in children. J Otolaryngol, 30, 216–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackler R. 1987. Chapter 152: Congenital malformations of the inner ear: A classification based on embryogenesis. In: C.W. Cummings, P.W. Flint, L.A. Harker, B.H. Haughey, M.A. Richardson, K.T. Robbins, D.E. Schuller, J.R. Thomas (eds.), Cummings Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Fourth Edition, Philadelphia, USA, Elsevier Mosby, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley E.P. 1987. ʽWelcome to Holland.’ Retrieved from http://www.our-kids.org/archives/Holland.html.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen L.V., Laplate-Lévesque A., Jones L., Preminger J.E., Nielsen C. et al. 2012. Conducting qualitative research in audiology: A tutorial. Int J Audiol, 51, 83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzer-White E. & Luterman D. 2003. Families and children with hearing loss: Grief and coping. Ment Retard Dev D, 9, 232–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutz J.W., Lee K.H., Isaacson B., Booth T.N., Sweeney M.H. et al. 2011. Cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve absence or deficiency. Otol Neurotol, 32, 956–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y., Bain L. & Steinberg A. G. 2004. Parental decision-making in considering cochlear implant technology for a deaf child. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 1027–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky M.R. 1994. The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In: J. Gubrium & A. Sankar (eds.), Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications. pp. 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Mastergeorge A.M. 1999. Revelations of family perceptions of diagnosis and disorder through metaphor. In: D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan & M. Maxwell (eds.), Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 245–256.
   Google Scholar
• Moog J.S. 2002. Changing expectations for children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 138–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos T.P., Gibbin K. & Dyar D. 2004. Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation using Nottingham children's implant profile (NChIP). Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos T.P. & Vlastarakos P.V. 2010. Treating options for deaf children. Early Hum Dev, 86, 669–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue G., Nikolopoulos T., Archbold S. & Tait M. 1999. Cochlear implants in young children: The relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. Ear Hear, 20, 419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okubo S., Takahashi M. & Kai I. 2008. How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med, 66, 2436–2447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G. 2005. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends in Amplification, 9, 1–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stake R. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky M., Teoh S. & Neuburger H. 2004. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neuro-Otol, 9, 224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait M., Lutman M.E. & Robinson K. 2000. Pre-implant measures of preverbal communicative behavior as predictors of cochlear implant outcomes in children. Ear Hear, 21, 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobey E.A. & Buckley K.A.2004. Educational and mode-of communication factors associated with paediatric cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int, 5(Suppl.1), 136–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin J.B., Barker B.A., Spencer L.J., Zhang X. & Gantz B.J. 2005. The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. J Speech Lang Hear R, 48, 853–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren F.M., Wiggins R.H., Pitt C., Harnsberger H.R. & Shelton C. 2010. Apparent cochlear nerve aplasia: To implant or not to implant?Otol Neurotol, 31, 1088–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wengraf T. 2001. Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler A., Archbold S., Hardie T. & Watson L. 2009. Children with cochlear implants: The communication journey. Cochlear Implants Int, 10, 41–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young N.M., Kim F.M., Ryan M.E., Tournis E. & Yaras S. 2012. Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 1442–1448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti D., Guida M., Barezzani M.G., Campovecchi C., Nassif N. et al. 2006. Favorable outcome of cochlear implant in VIIIth nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol, 27, 815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z., Li Y., Hu L., Wang Z., Huang Q. et al. 2012. Cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency: A report of nine cases. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 1188–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar