A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale)

References

• Ahlstrom J.B., Horwitz A.R. & Dubno J.R. 2009. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing aids. Ear Hear, 30, 203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeroyd M.A. & Guy. F.H. 2011. The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 312–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeroyd M.A., Guy F.H., Harrison D.L. & Suller S.L. 2011. A factor analysis of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 51, 262 (conference abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Banh J., Singh G. & Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2012. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audiometric loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. 2011. Recommended procedure: Pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking. Reading: British Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M.W. 2001. An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36, 111–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll J.B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-analytic Studies. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell R.B. 1966. The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell R.B. & Vogelmann S. 1977. A comprehensive trial of the Scree and KG criteria for determining the number of factors. Journal of Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 289–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey A.L. & Lee H.B. 1992. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Costello A.B. & Osborne J.W. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck R. & MacCallum R.C. (eds.). 2007. Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions. Mahweh, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Demeester K., Topsakal V., Hendrickx J.J., Fransen E., van Laer L. et al. 2012. Hearing disability measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5). Ear Hear, 33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinno A. 2009. Exploring the sensitivity of Horn”s parallel analysis to the distributional form of random data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 362–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas S.A., Young P., Daudia A., Gatehouse S & O’Donoghue G.M. 2007. Spatial hearing disability after acoustic neuroma removal. Laryngoscope, 117, 1648–1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B & Tibshirani R.J. 1994. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fabriger L.R., Wegener D.T., MacCallum R.C. & Strahan E.J. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psych Methods, 4, 272–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. 2009. Discovering Statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd F.J. & Widaman K.F. 1995. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psych Assessment, 7, 286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Hughes K.C. & Mok M. 2010. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant?Int J Audiol, 49, 368–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Mok M. & Dowell R.C. 2007. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 28, 470–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Akeroyd M.A. 2006. Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. Int J Audiol, 45 (Suppl. 1), S120–S124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli E. & Velicer W.F. 1988. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull, 103, 265–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton J.C., Allen D.G. & Scarpello V. 2004. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer K.S & Vargo M. 2009. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn J.L. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen N.S., Akeroyd M.A., Noble W. & Naylor G. 2009. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) as a benefit measure. Poster presented at the NCRAR conference on “The Ear-Brain System: Approaches to the Study and Treatment of Hearing Loss”, Portland, October 2009 (see http://www.ihr.mrc.ac.uk/products/display/ssq).
   Google Scholar
• Jennrich R.I. 1979. Admissible values of gamma in direct oblimin rotation. Psychometrika, 44, 173–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennrich R.I. 2007. Rotation methods, algorithms, and standard errors. In: Cudeck & MacCallum (eds.). Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions. Mahweh, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 315–336.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser H.F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser H.F. 1970. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass R.A. & Tinsley H.E.A. 1979. Factor analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 11, 120–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G., O’Brien A., Hain J.U., McLelland M. & Yeend I. 2009. The effect of frequency-dependent microphone directionality on horizontal localization performance in hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 48, 789–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Grugel L., Meister H. & Meis M. 2011. Übertragung der fragebögen SADL, ECHO und SSQ ins Deutsche und deren Evaluation [German translations of questionnaires SADl, ECHO, and SSQ and their evaluation]. Z Audio, 50, 616.
   Google Scholar
• Kobler S., Lindblad A.C., Olofsson A. & Hagerman B. 2010. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance. Int J Audiol, 49, 613–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichikawa M. & Konishi S. 1995. Application of bootstrap methods in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 60, 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert Z.V., Wildt A.R. & Durand R.M. 1991. Approximating confidence intervals for factor loadings. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum R.C., Widaman K.F., Zhang S. & Hong S. 1999. Sample size in factor analysis. Psych Methods, 4, 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin T.P.C., Lowther R., Cooper H., Holder R.L., Irving R.M. et al. 2010. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: Experience with 58 patients. Clin Otolaryngol, 35, 284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most T., Adi-Bensaid L., Shpak T., Sharkiya S. & Luntz M. 2012. Everyday hearing functioning in unilateral versus bilateral hearing-aid users. American Journal of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Medicine and Surgery, 33, 205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. & Gatehouse S. 2004. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol, 43, 100–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W. & Gatehouse S. 2006. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 45, 172–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Tyler R., Dunn C. & Bhullar N. 2008. Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: Comparing self-assessed and measured abilities. Int J Audiol, 47, 505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Naylor G., Bhullar N. & Akeroyd M.A. 2012. Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: A stratified sampling approach. Int J Audiol, 51, 174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Jensen N.S., Naylor G., Bhullar N. & Akeroyd M.A. 2013. A short form of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12. Int J Audiol, 52, 409–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odelius J. & Johansson O. 2010. Self-assessment of classroom assistive listening devices. Int J Audiol, 49, 508–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlmann J.T. 2004. Use and interpretation of factor analysis in the Journal of Educational Research: 1992–2002. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts L.G., Skinner M.W., Litovsky R.A., Strube M.J. & Kuk F. 2009. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the non-implanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 353–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher K.J. & MacCullum R.C. 2003. Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.
   Google Scholar
• Singh G. & Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2010. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol, 49, 733–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman C. 1904. ‘General Intelligence’, objectively determined and measured. Am J Psych, 15, 201–292.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens J. 1996. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Mahwah, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell L.S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson B. & Daniel L.G. 1996. Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone L.L. 1935. The Vectors of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Perreau A.E. & Haihong J. 2009. Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear, 30, 466–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen A., de Voecht K., Bosman A.J. & Wouters J. 2011. Functional benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: Objective and subjective measures. Clin Otolaryngol, 36, 114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer W.F. & Jackson D.N. 1990. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zientek L.R. & Thompson B. 2007. Applying the bootstrap to the multivariate case: Bootstrap component/factor analysis, Behavior Research Methods, 39, 318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G., Preacher K.J. & Luo S. 2010. Bootstrap confidence intervals for ordinary least squares factor loadings and correlations in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 104–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwick W.R. & Velicer W.F. 1986. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psych Bull, 99, 432–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar