The acceptable noise level: The effect of repeated measurements

References

• Altman, D.G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Beahan N., Kei J., Driscoll C., Charles B. & Khan A. 2012. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: A test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Ear Hear, 33, 104–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D.E., Boers M. & Wells G.A. 2002. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): A literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 14, 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J.M. & Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström K.J., Lantz J., Holme Nielsen L. & Olsen S.O. 2012a. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials. Int J Audiol, 51, 146–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström K.J., Zunic E., Borovac A. & Ibertsson T. 2012b. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 542–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K. et al. 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley H.J. & Nabelek I.V. 1996. Estimation of client-assessed hearing-aid performance based upon unaided variables. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirks D.D. & Kamm C. 1976. Psychometric functions for loudness discomfort and most comfortable loudness levels. J Speech Hear Res, 19, 613–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling C., Ludvigsen C. & Lyregaard P.E. 1989. DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol, 18, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin C.A., Jr., Thelin J.W., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2006. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Fisher Smiley D., Muenchen R.A. & Konrad T.N. 2006. Acceptable noise level: Reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 640–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Nabelek A.K., Burchfield S.B. & Thelin J.W. 2005a. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 228–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Plyler P.N., Thelin J.W. & Hedrick M.S. 2007. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Thelin J.W., Plyler P.N., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2005b. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 677–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman J.J. 2009. The effects of testing method, alternate types of target stimuli and attention on acceptable noise level (ANL) scores in normal-hearing listeners Communication Sciences and Disorders: James Madison University.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Hickey S., Adams E., Moore R., Gaal A., Berry K. et al. 2012a. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 534–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Hickey S., Moore R.E., Estis J.M. 2012b. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 1356–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Hickey S. & Moore R.E. 2007. Influence of music and music preference on acceptable noise levels in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 417–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkrider A.W. & Smith S.B. 2005. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 530–545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkrider A.W. & Tampas J.W. 2006. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho H.C., Wu Y.H., Hsiao S.H., Stangl E., Lentz E.J. et al. 2012. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: A study across the U.S. and Taiwan. Int J Audiol, 52, 83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube I., Fredelake S., Vlaming M. & Kollmeier B. 2010. Development and analysis of an international speech test signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol, 49, 891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-1. 1998a. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 1: Ear simulator for the calibration of supra-aural earphones. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-2. 1998b. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 2: An interim acoustic coupler for the calibration of audiometric earphones in the extended high-frequency range. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1. 1998. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization 8253-1.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-8. 2004. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization 389-8.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-5. 2006. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8 to 16 kHz. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization 389-5.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC. 2007. ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007 International vocabulary of metrology - Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jerlvall L.B. & Arlinger S.D. 1986. A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. Scand Audiol, 15, 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam A.C., Sung J.K., Lee T., Wong T.K. & van Hasselt A. 2012. Clinical evaluation of a computerized self-administered hearing test. Int J Audiol, 51, 606–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J.S. & Bryan M.F. 2011. The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise. Int J Audiol, 50, 290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore R., Gordon-Hickey S. & Jones A. 2011. Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller H.G., Weber J. & Hornsby B.W. 2006. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif, 10, 83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Freyaldenhoven M.C., Tampas J.W., Burchfiel S.B. & Muenchen R.A. 2006. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing-aid use. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 626–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Burchfield S.B. 2004a. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 47, 1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Burchfield S.B. 2004b. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 47, 1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tucker F.M. & Letowski T.R. 1991. Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 679–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nichols A.C. & Gordon-Hickey S. 2012. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 51, 353–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen S.O., Lantz J., Nielsen L.H. & Brannstrom K.J. 2012a. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 51, 678–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen S.O., Nielsen L.H., Lantz J. & Brannstrom K.J. 2012b. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 51, 557–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plyler P.N., Alworth L.N., Rossini T.P. & Mapes K.E. 2011. Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 50, 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch J., Joseph A. & Rakerd B. 2004. Most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels: Six decades of research. Am J Audiol, 13, 144–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers D.S., Harkrider A.W., Burchfield S.B. & Nabelek A.K. 2003. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 372–382, quiz 401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tampas J.W. & Harkrider A.W. 2006. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1548–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor B. 2008. The acceptable noise level test as a predictor of real-world hearing-aid benefit. The Hearing Journal, 61, 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Weir J.P. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hapsburg D. & Bahng J. 2006. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar