Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD

References

• Avinash, Methib R. & Kumar U.A. 2009. Development of sentence material for Quick speech in noise test (Quick SIN) in Kannada. Journal of Indian Speech and Hearing Association, 23, 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Hurley A. & Wen H. 1996. Hearing aids: Only for hearing impaired patients with abnormal otoacoustic emissions. In: C.I. Berlin (ed.), Hair Cells and Hearing Aids. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Hood L., Morlet T., Rose K. & Brashears S. 2003. Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony: Diagnosis and management. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev, 9, 225–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buss E., Labadie R.F., Brown C.J., Gross A.J., Grose J.H. & Pillsbury H.C. 2002. Outcome of cochlear implantation in pediatric auditory neuropathy. Otol Neurotol, 23, 328–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A. & Zeng F. 2007. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1079–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman R. 1995a. Speech intelligibility in noise: Relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 1796–1798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman R. 1995b. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman R., Festen M.J. & Plomp R. 1994. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 2670–2680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney D.J. 1952. Statistical Methods in Biological Assay. London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Gallun F & Souza P. 2008. Exploring the role of the modulation spectrum in phoneme recognition. Ear Hear, 29, 800–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtgast T. & Steeneken H.J.M. 1985. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. J Acoust Soc Am, 77, 1069–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. 1994. Acoustic-reference zero for calibration of audiometric equipment, Part 2: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure level for pure-tones and bone vibrator ISO 398–3. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Bradlow A.R., Cheatham M.A., Cunningham J., King C.D. et al. 2000. Consequences of neural asynchrony: A case of auditory neuropathy. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 1, 33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause J.C. & Braida L.D. 2002. Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 2165–2172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruase J.C. & Braida L.D. 2004. Acoustical properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 362–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar U.A. & Jayaram, M. (2005). Auditory processing in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 1, 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou P. 2005. Evaluation of the companding and other strategies for noise reduction in cochlear implants. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prosthesis, Asilomar, Monterey, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Narne V.K. & Vanaja C. 2008. Effect of envelope enhancement on speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear, 29, 45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narne V.K. & Vanaja C.S. 2009a. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear, 30, 136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narne V.K. & Vanaja C.S. 2009b. Perception of speech with envelope enhancement in individuals with auditory neuropathy and simulated loss of temporal modulation processing. Int J Audiol, 48, 700–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordhoek I.M. & Drullman R. 1997. Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez J. & Mann V.A. 2005. Using auditory-visual integration to probe the basis of noise-impaired speech perception in reading disability and auditory neuropathy. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 122–133.
   Google Scholar
• Rance G. & Barker E.J. 2008. Speech perception in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony managed with either hearing AIDS or cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 29, 179–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Barker E.J., Mok M., Dowell R., Ricon A. et al. 2007. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/ dyssynchrony type hearing loss. Ear Hear, 28, 351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y. & Oba S. 2001. Patients with auditory neuropathy: Who are they and what can they hear? In: Y. Sininger & A. Starr (eds.), Auditory Neuropathy: A New Perspective on Hearing Disorder. Canada: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Shallop J. 2002. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony in adults and children. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Shallop J.K., Peterson A., Facer G.W., Fabry L.B. & Driscoll C.L. 2001. Cochlear implants in five cases of auditory neuropathy: Postoperative findings and progress. Laryngoscope, 111, 555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y., Hood L. & Berlin C.I. 1996. Auditory neuropathy. Brain, 119, 741–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teagle H.F., Roush P., Woodard J.S., Hatch. D.R., Zdanski C.J. et al. 2010. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear Hear, 31, 325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turicchia L. & Sarpeshkar R. 2005. A bio-inspired companding strategy for spectral enhancement. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process, 13, 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Kong Y.Y., Michalewski H.J. & Starr A. 2005. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol, 93, 3050–3063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G. & Liu S. 2006. Speech perception in auditory neuropathy subjects. J Sp Hear Res, 42, 367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Oba S., Garde S., Sininger Y. & Starr A. 2001. Psychoacoustics and speech perception in auditory neuropathy. In: Y. Sininger & A. Starr (eds.), Auditory Neuropathy: A New Perspective on Hearing Disorder. Canada: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Oba S., Sininger Y.S. & Starr A. 1999. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neuroreport, 10, 3429–3435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar