The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

References

• Andersson G. & Willebrand M. 2003. What is coping? A critical review of the construct and its application in audiology. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl. 1), S97–S103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. & EuroQol Group. 1996. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy, 37, 53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M., Quintas R., Boldt C., Raggi A., Cieza A. et al. 2011. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: Its use, implementation, and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil, 33, 281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A., Brockow T., Ewert T., Amman, E., Kollerits B. et al. 2002. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med, 34, 205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A., Geyh S., Chatterji S., Kostanjsek N., Üstün B. et al. 2005. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med, 37, 212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A. & Stucki G. 2008. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health: Its development process and content validity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 44, 303–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J.L., Roeser R.J. & Mendrygal M. 2007. Middle ear measures. In: Roeser, Valente & Hosford-Dunn (eds.). Audiology Diagnosis, 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., pp. 380–399.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton D.S., Cruickshanks K.J., Klein B.E.K., Klein R., Wiley T.L. et al. 2003. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist, 43, 661–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark B., Cieza A., Gangé J., Gimigliano F., Granberg S. et al. 2010. International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol, 49, 256–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer J., Thornton A.R. & Krumbholz K. 2012. What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?J Neurophysiol, 107, 1301–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest M.E. & Erdman S.A. 1987. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord, 52, 129–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erdtman E., Tideman M., Fleetwood C. & Möller K. 2012. Research initiation based on idea-circles: From research object to co-actor. Disabil Soc, 27, 879–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R., Finger M., Glässel A., Gradinger F., Lückenkemper M. et al. 2011. A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Occup Rehabil, 21, 134–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. 1998. Speech tests as measures of outcome. Scand Audiol, 27 (Suppl. 49), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. 1999. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 80–103.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg S., Dahlström J., Möller C., Kähäri K.. & Danermark B. 2014. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss – researcher perspective, Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research. Int J Audiol, 53, 65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim U.H. & Lundman B. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today, 24, 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg L.R.-M. & Carlsson S.G. 1991. A qualitative study of strategies for managing a hearing impairment. Br J Audiol, 25, 201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallberg L.R.-M., Eriksson-Mangold M. & Carlsson S.G. 1992. Psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the Communication Strategies Scale of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 666–674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hétu R., Riverin L., Lalande N., Getty L. & St-Cyr C. 1988. Qualitative analysis of the handicap associated with occupational hearing loss. Br J Audiol, 22, 251–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICF Research Branch. 2012. ICF Core Sets. Manual for Clinical Practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan H., Bally S., Brandt F., Busacco D. & Pray J. 1997. Communication Scale for Older Adults (CSOA). J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 203–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlsson Espmark A.-K. & Hansson Scherman M. 2003. Hearing confirms existence and identity: Experiences from persons with presbyacusis. Int J Audiol, 42, 106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S. et al. 2003. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol, 42 (Suppl. 2), S92–S101.
   Google Scholar
• Killion M.C. & Gudmundsen G.I. 2005. Fitting hearing aids using clinical prefitting speech measures: An evidence-based review. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 439–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kondracki N.L., Wellman N.S. & Amundson D.R. 2002. Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav, 34, 224–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus R.S. 1993. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosom Med, 55, 234–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer C. & Hickson L. 2012. What factors influence help-seeking for hearing impairment and hearing aid adoption in older adults?Int J Audiol, 51, 66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trend Amplif, 10, 29–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Post M.W.M., Kirchberger I., Scheuringer M., Wollaars M.M. & Geyh S. 2010. Outcome parameters in spinal cord injury research: A systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. Spinal Cord, 48, 522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley M., Waddington L. & Bessozi C. 2010a. Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: Learning from disabled people's organizations. Disabil Soc, 25, 731–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley M., Waddington L. & Bessozi C. 2010b. ERRATUM. Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: Learning from disabled people's organizations. Disabil Soc, 25, 875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce H. & Gooberman-Hill R. 2012. ’There's a hell of a noise‘: living with a hearing loss in residential care. Age Ageing, 41, 40–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed G.M., Lux J.B., Bufka L.F., Trask C., Peterson D.B. et al. 2005. Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol, 50, 122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson K., Gatehouse S. & Browning G.G. 1996. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 105, 415–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeser R.J. & Clark J.L. 2007. Pure-tone tests. In: Roeser, Valente, & Hosford-Dunn (eds.). Audiology Diagnosis, 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc., pp. 238–260.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Chisolm T.H. & Abrams H.B. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes: Not as easy as it seems. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarinci N., Worrall L. & Hickson L. 2009. The ICF and third-party disability: Its application to spouses of older people with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 2088–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threats T. 2007. Access for persons with neurogenic communication disorders: Influences of personal and environmental factors of the ICF. Aphasiology, 21, 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N. 1994. Communication strategies training [monograph]. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 27, 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Walden B.E., Demorest M.E. & Hepler E.L. 1984. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 49–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware J.E.J., Snow K.K., Kosinski M. & Gandek B. 1993. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I. & Weinstein B. 1982. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001a. Fifty-fourth world health assembly, WHA 54.21. Agenda item 13.9, 22 May 2001. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Retrieved 7 Jan, 2013, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/wha-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001b. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Zochling J., Bonjean M., Grill E., Scheuringer M., Stucki G. et al. 2006. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on the treatment of acute inflammatory arthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 25, 807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar