795
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A randomized controlled trial of nonlinear frequency compression versus conventional processing in hearing aids: Speech and language of children at three years of age

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages S46-S54 | Received 01 Oct 2013, Accepted 19 Oct 2013, Published online: 19 Dec 2013

References

  • AAA. 2013. American Academy of Audiology Clinical Guidelines: Paediatric Amplification. www.audiology.org.
  • Alexander J.M. 2013. Individual variability in recognition of frequency- lowered speech. Sem Hear, 34, 86–109.
  • ABS. 2008. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2006: Technical paper. Canberra: Brian Pink.
  • Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T.Y.C., Katsch R. & Keidser G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
  • CASALA. 2007. Computed Assisted Speech and Language Assessment software (CASALA v.4.0),University of Melbourne.
  • Ching T.Y.C., Dillon H., Marnane V., Hou S., Day J. et al. 2013. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at three years of age: Findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear, 34, 535–552.
  • Ching T.Y.C. 2012. Hearing aids for children. In: L. Wong, L. Hickson (eds.), Evidence-based Practice in Audiology: Evaluating Interventions for Children and Adults with Hearing Impairment. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 93–118.
  • Ching T.Y.C. & Hill M. 2007. The parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale: Normative data. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 220–235.
  • Ching T.Y.C., Johnson E.E., Hou S., Dillon H., Zhang V. et al. (this issue).A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing aid fitting: estimates of loudness and speech intelligibility. Int J Audiol.
  • Cohen J. 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dillon H. 2012. Hearing Aids. (2nd ed.), Sydney: Boomerang Press, pp. 238–245.
  • Dodd B., Hua Z., Crosbie S., Holm A. & Ozanne A. 2002. Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology. London: Psychological Corporation.
  • Dorman M.F., Raphael L.J. & Isenberg D. 1980. Acoustic cues for the fricative-affricate contrast in word-final position. J Phon, 8, 397–405.
  • Dorman M.F., Raphael L.J. & Liberman A.M. 1979. Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 65, 1518–1532.
  • Dunn L.M. & Dunn L.M. 2007. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.), Minneapolis, USA: Pearson Assessments.
  • Glista D. & Scollie S. 2012. Development and evaluation of an English language measure of detection of word-final plurality markers. The University of Western Ontario plurals test. Am J Audiol, 21, 76–81.
  • Glista D., Scollie S., Bagatto M., Seewald R., Parsa V. et al. 2009. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: Clincal outcomes. Int J Audiol, 48, 632–644.
  • Harrington J., Cox F. & Evans Z. 1997. An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Aus J Ling, 17, 155–184.
  • Hillenbrand J., Getty L.A., Clark M.J. & Wheeler K. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3099–3111.
  • Ireton H. 2005. Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Child Development Review.
  • King A.M. 2010. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia. Int J Audiol, 49, S64–S69.
  • Kortekaas R.W.L. & Stelmachowicz P.G. 2000. Bandwidth effects on children's pereption of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 645–660.
  • Kluender K.R. & Walsh M.A. 1992. Amplitude rise time and the perception of the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction. Percept Psychophys, 51, 328–333.
  • McCreery R.W., Venediktov R.A., Coleman J.J. & Leech H.M. 2012. An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss. Am J Audiol, 21, 313–328.
  • McDermott H. 2011. A technical comparison of digital frequency-lowering algorithms avaialble in two current hearing aids. PLoS ONE, 6, e22358.
  • Miller G.A. & Nicely P.E. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am, 27, 338–352.
  • Moeller M.P., Hoover B., Putman C., Arbataitis K., Bohnenkamp G. et al. 2007. Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing. Part I. Phonetic development. Ear Hear, 28, 605–627.
  • Moeller M.P., McCleary E., Putman C., Tyler-Krings A., Hoover B. et al. 2010. Longitudinal development of phonology and morphology in children with late-identified mild-moderate sensori-neural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 31, 625–635.
  • Moodie K.S., Seewald R. & Sinclair S.T. 1994. Procedure for predicting real ear hearing aid performance in young children. Am J Audiol, 3, 23–31.
  • Moore B.C., Stone M.A., Fullgrabe C., Glasberg B.R. & Puria S. 2008. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear, 29, 907–922.
  • Pittman A.L. 2008. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 785–797.
  • Rubin D.B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
  • Scollie S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse L.E., Moodie S., Bagatto M. et al. 2005. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 159–197.
  • Seewald R., Cornelisse L.E. & Ramji K.V. 1997. DSL v4.1 for Windows: A software implementation of the desired sensation level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. User's manual. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario Hearing Health Care Research Unit.
  • Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M. & Lewis D.E. 2001. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2183–2190.
  • Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B. & Lewis D.E. 2004. Novel-word learning in children with normal hearing and hearing loss. Ear Hear, 25, 47–56.
  • Stelmachowicz P.G., Lewis D.E., Choi S. & Hoover B. 2007. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear, 28, 483–494.
  • Wolfe J., John A., Schafer E., Nyffeler M., Boretzki M. et al. 2010. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 618–628.
  • Wolfe J., John A., Schafer E., Nyffeler M., Boretzzki M. et al. 2011. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 396–404.
  • Zhang W.V., Ching T.Y.C., Hou S., Wong A., Burns L. et al. 2012. Effects of frequency compression on aided cortical evoked potentials (CAEPs) of children with hearing loss. Proceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Sydney, 3–6 Dec 2012.
  • Zimmerman I., Steiner V.G. & Pond R.E. 2002. Preschool Language Scale (4th ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.