Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children

References

• Başkent D. & Chatterjee M. 2010. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech. Hear Res, 270, 127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P.J. 1997. Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant?Am J Otol, 18, S11–S12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. 1997. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: Issues of efficacy and assessment. Scand Audiol Suppl, 46, 17–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. & Nittrouer S. 1988. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 84, 101–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson M.L., Driscoll C.L., Gifford R.H., Service G.J., Tombers N.M. et al. 2011. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol, 32, 962–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J.E., Bai J.Y. & Zeng F.G. 2006. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 53, 2598–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Incerti P. & Hill M. 2004. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25, 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Psarros C., Hill M., Dillon H. & Incerti P. 2001. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?Ear Hear, 22, 365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chistovich L.A. 1985. Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 77, 789–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky C. 1969. The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, USA: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen N.L. 2004. Cochlear implant candidacy and surgical considerations. Audiol Neurootol, 9, 197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington H.E. & Zeng F.G. 2010. Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear. Ear Hear, 31, 70–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley G.J., Blamey P.J., Seligman P.M., Alcantara J.I., Clark G.M. et al. 1993. Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 119, 55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F. & Gifford R.H. 2010. Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 49, 912–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayad J.N. & Linthicum F.H. Jr. 2006. Multichannel cochlear implants: Relation of histopathology to performance. Laryngoscope, 116, 1310–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox R.A. & Jacewicz E. 2010. Auditory spectral integration in nontraditional speech cues in diotic and dichotic listening. Percept Motor Skills, 111, 543–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox R.A., Jacewicz E. & Feth L.L. 2008. Spectral integration of dynamic cues in the perception of syllable-initial stops. Phonetica, 65, 19–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J. & Turner C. W. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope, 113, 1726–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C. & Gfeller K.E. 2006. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol, 11 Suppl. 1, 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford R.H., Dorman M.F., McKarns S.A. & Spahr A.J. 2007. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: Word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 835–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman R. & Fristoe M. 2000. Goldman Fristoe 2: Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, USA: American Guidance Service, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goupell M.J., Stoelb C., Kan A. & Litovsky R.Y. 2013. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 2272–2287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzavi J., Pok S.M., Gstoettner W. & Baumgartner W.D. 2004. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol, 43, 61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms J., Müller J., Schön F., Moser L., Arnold W. et al. 1997. Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: A multicentric clinical study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 59, 23–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti P.V., Ching T.Y. & Cowan R. 2013. A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: Device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices. Trends Amplif, 17, 3–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimchi R. 2009. Perceptual organization and visual attention. Prog Brain Res, 176, 15–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. 1961. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol, 15, 166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y. & Braida L.D. 2011. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 959–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman A.M., Isenberg D. & Rakerd B. 1981. Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode. Percept Psychophys, 30, 133–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman I.Y., Shankweiler D., Fischer F.W. & Carter B. 1974. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. J Exp Child Psychol, 18, 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizou P.C., Mani A. & Dorman M.F. 2003. Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Boothroyd A. & Minniear D. 2001. Evaluation of the computer-assisted speech perception assessment test (CASPA). J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 390–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann V.A. & Liberman A.M. 1983. Some differences between phonetic and auditory modes of perception. Cognition, 14, 211–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N. & Brownell R. 2011. Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT). (4th ed.) Novato, USA: Academic Therapy Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Müller J., Schön F. & Helms J. 2002. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 23, 198–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH Consensus Development Panel. 1995. Cochlear implants in adults and children. JAMA, 274, 1955–1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niparko J.K. & Wilson B.S. 2000. History of cochlear implants. In: J.K. Niparko, K.I. Kirk, N.K. Mellon, A.M. Robbins, D.L. Tucci & B.S. Wilson (eds.), Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Boothroyd A. 1990. Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2705–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Chapman C. 2009. The effects of bilateral electric and bimodal electric-acoustic stimulation on language development. Trends Amplif, 13, 190–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nittrouer S. & Lowenstein J.H. 2010. Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1624–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S., Lowenstein J.H. & Packer R. 2009. Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes. J Exp Psychol Human, 35, 1245–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger M.J. 1994. Speech perception and production results in children with multichannel cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 2905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Pisoni D.B. & Carrell T.D. 1981. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risberg A. & Agelfors E. 1982. Speech perception based on non-speech signals. In: R. Carlson and B. Granstrom (eds.), The Representation of Speech in the Peripheral Auditory System. Elsevier Biomedical Press, pp. 209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen S., Faulkner A. & Wilkinson L. 1999. Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 3629–3636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski H., Lorens A., D'Haese P., Walkowiak A., Poitrowska A. et al. 2002. Preservation of residual hearing in children and postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: An initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 64, 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Clark G.M., Whitford L.A., Seligman P.M., Staller S.J. et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. Am J Otol, 15 Suppl. 2, 15–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E., Kortekaas R.W. & Pittman A.L. 2000. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 902–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy M. 1983. Limits on alternative auditory representations of speech. Ann NY Acad Sci, 405, 33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy M., Shankweiler D. & Pisoni D. 1972. Auditory and phonetic processes in speech perception: Evidence from a dichotic study. Cogn Psychol, 3, 455–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ilberg C.A., Baumann U., Kiefer J., Tillein J. & Adunka O.F. 2011. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: A review of the first decade. Audiol Neurootol, 16 Suppl. 2, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley A.C., Smith L.B. & Jusczyk P.W. 1986. The role of phonemes and syllables in the perceived similarity of speech sounds for children. Mem Cognit, 14, 220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen D.H. & Liberman A.M. 1987. Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception. Science, 237, 169–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson G.S. & Robertson G.J. 2006. The Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT), (4th ed.). Lutz, USA: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B.S. 2006. Speech processing strategies. In: H.R. Cooper & L.C. Craddock (eds.), Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide (2nd ed). Hoboken, USA: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 21–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H.I. & Zeng F.G. 2013. Reduced acoustic and electric integration in concurrent-vowel recognition. Sci Rep, 3, 1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar