Lexical effects on recognition of the NU-6 words by monolingual and bilingual listeners

References

• American National Standards Institute. 2010. ANSI-S3.6-2010, Specifications for Audiometers. New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Auer E.T. Jr. & Bernstein L.E. 2008. Estimating when and how words are acquired: A natural experiment on the development of the mental lexicon. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 750–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B. et al. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods, 39, 445–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg I. & Rowe E.J. 1972. Continuous judgments of word frequency and familiarity. J Exp Psychol, 95, 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Benkí J.R. 2003. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1689–1705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best C., McRoberts G. & Goodell E. 2001. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 775–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black J.W. 1952. Accompaniments of word intelligibility. J Speech Hear Disord, 17, 409–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom P. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow A.R. & Pisoni D.B. 1999. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2074–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D.E. 1967. Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychol Rev, 74, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateau D. & Jared D. 2000. Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Mem Cogn, 28, 143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluff M.S. & Luce P.A. 1990. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken bisyllabic words. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 16, 551–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Connine C.M., Titone D. & Wang J. 1993. Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 19, 81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. 1978. Audiometry: Pure tone and simple speech tests. In: H. Davis & S.R. Silverman (eds.), Hearing and Deafness. Austin, USA: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, pp. 183–221.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra A., Grainger J. & van Heuven W. 1999. Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. J Mem Lang, 41, 496–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks D.D., Takayanagi S., Moshfegh P., Noffsinger P.D. & Fausti S.A. 2001. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear, 22, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor E. & Klein D. 1992. Phonological processing bilingual word recognition. In: R. Harris (ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Droop M. & Verhoeven L. 2003. Language proficiency and reading ability in first-and second-language learners. Read Res Q, 38, 78–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J. 1948. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 955–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis A.W. & Morrison C.M. 1998. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 24, 515–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaygen D.E. & Luce P.A. 1998. Effects of modality on subjective frequency estimates and processing of spoken and printed words. Percept Psychophys, 60, 465–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilhooly K.J. & Logie R.H. 1980. Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words. Behav Res Methods Instrum, 12, 395–427.
   Google Scholar
• Goldinger S.D., Luce P.A., Pisoni B.D. & Marcario J.K. 1992. Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competitive activation and response biases. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 18, 1210–1237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes D. 1957. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. J Acoust Soc Am, 29, 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai S., Walley A.C. & Flege J.E. 2005. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accent words by native English and Spanish listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 896–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared D., McRae K. & Seidenberg M.S. 1990. The basis of consistency effects in word naming. J Mem Lang, 29, 687–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger S. & Jerger J. 1981. Auditory Disorders – A Manual for Clinical Evaluation. Boston, USA: Little, Brown, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz B.J. 2005. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychol Bull, 131, 684–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk K.I., Pisoni D.B. & Osberger M.J. 1995. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 16, 470–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz R.J. 1987. The subjective familiarity of English homophones. Mem Cogn, 15, 154–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce P.A. & Pisoni D.B. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian V., Blumenfeld H.K. & Kaushanskaya M. 2007. The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 940–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R. & Wilson R.H. 2008. Prediction of word recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 507–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison C.M. & Ellis A.W. 1995. Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 21, 116–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum H.C., Pisoni D.B. & Davis C.K. 1984. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20 000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report (No. 10). Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Owens E. 1961. Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity. J Speech Hear Res, 4, 113–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmeri T.J., Goldinger S.D. & Pisoni D.B. 1993. Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 19, 309–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett K. 1997. Theories of early language acquisition. Trends Cogn Sci, 1, 146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., MacCallum R.C. & Nicewander W.A. 2005. Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychol Methods, 10, 178–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaine S. 1995. Bilingualism. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Savin H.B. 1963. Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 35, 200–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2011. How “proficient” is proficient? Subjective proficiency measure as a predictor of bilingual listeners’ recognition of English words. Am J Audiol, 19, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2012. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners’ perception of degraded English sentences. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 219–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. 2013. How “proficient” is proficient?. Comparison of English and relative proficiency rating as a predictor of bilingual listeners’ word recognition. Am J Audiol, 21, 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L.-F. & Sánchez D. 2011. The role of word familiarity in Spanish/English bilingual word recognition. Int J Audiol, 50, 66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers M.S. & Danielson S.M. 1999. Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychol Aging, 11, 333–341.
   Google Scholar
• Specht K., Holtel C., Zahn R., Herzog H., Krause B. et al. 2003. Lexical decision of nonwords and pseudowords in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Neurosci Lett, 345, 177–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayanagi S., Dirks D.D. & Moshfegh A. 2002. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 585–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman T.W. & Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University auditory test no. 6. SAM-TR-66-55, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch M.S. & Luce P.A. 1999. Probablistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. J Mem Lang, 40, 474–408.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H., Zizz C.A., Shanks J.E. & Causey J.D. 1990. Normative data in quiet, broadband noise, and competing message for Northwestern University auditory test no. 6 by a female speaker. J Speech Hear Disord, 55, 771–778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar