Relationship between leisure noise exposure and otoacoustic emissions in a young Asian population

References

• Attias J., Bresloff I., Reshef I., Horowitz G. & Furman V. 1998. Evaluating noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol, 32, 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J., Horovitz G., El-Hatib N. & Nageris B. 2001. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health, 3, 19–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desai A., Reed D., Cheyne A., Richards S. & Prasher D. 1999. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health, 1, 58–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorn P.A., Piskorski P., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. & Keefe D.H. 1999. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Hear Res, 20, 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Dunckley K.T. & Dreisbach L.E. 2004. Gender effects on high frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ear Hear, 25, 554–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder K., Marro L., Keith S.E. & Michaud D.S. 2013. Audiometric thresholds and portable digital audio player user listening habits. Int J Audiol, 52, 606–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W., Ding D. & Zheng X. 1992. A comparison of changes in the stereocilia between temporary and permanent hearing losses in acoustic trauma. Hear Res, 62, 27–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. & Dorn P.A. 1999. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Ear Hear, 20, 345–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R.P., Patterson J.H., Turrentine G.A. & Ahroon W.A. 1989. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res, 38, 199–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetu R. & Fortin M. 1995. Potential risk of hearing damage associated with exposure to highly amplified music. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 378–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Job A., Raynal M., Kossowski M., Studler M., Ghernaouti C. et al. 2009. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: A three-year follow-up study. Hear Res, 251, 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith S.E., Michaud D.S, Feder K., Haider I., Marro L. et al. 2011. MP3 player listening sound pressure levels among 10 to 17 year old students. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 2756–2764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D.T., Ryan S. & Bray P. 1990. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 11, 93–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M.G., Hong S.M., Shim H.J., Kim Y.D., Cha C.I. et al. 2009. Hearing threshold of Korean adolescents associated with the use of personal music players. Yonsei Med J, 50, 771–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa S.G. & Liberman M.C. 2006. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: Evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci, 26, 2115–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L. & Heller L.M. 2004. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol, 43, 307–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L., Heller L.M. & Hughes L.M. 2006. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 280–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePage E.L. & Murray N.M. 1998. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: A study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust, 169, 588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levey S., Levey T. & Fligor B.J. 2011. Noise exposure estimates of urban MP3 player users. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 263–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield J.D., Baghurst P.A. & Newton V.E. 1999. Otoacoustic emissions in 28 young adults exposed to amplified music. Br J Audiol, 33, 211–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafapour S.P, Lahargoue K. & Gates G.A. 1998. Noise-induced hearing loss in young adults: The role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise. Laryngoscope, 108, 1832–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette M.S. 2003. Clinical observations with evoked otoacoustic emissions at Mayo Clinic. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 213–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinette M.S. & Glattke T.J. 2007. Otoacoustic Emissions Clinical Applications. (3rd ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc, 334.
   Google Scholar
• Santaolalla Montoya F., Ibargüen A.M., Vences A.R., del Rey A.S. et al. 2008. Evaluation of cochlear function in normal-hearing young adults exposed to MP3 player noise by analysing transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 37, 718–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnaz N. 2008. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in Caucasian and Chinese young adults. Int J Audiol, 47, 76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shupak A., Tal D., Sharoni Z., Oren M., Ravid A. et al. 2007. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 28, 745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto R., Chelotti S., Moriconi L., Pellegrini S., Citroni A. et al. 2007. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 387–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman A.H., Seluakumaran K. & Husain R. 2013. Hearing risk associated with the usage of personal listening devices among urban high school students in Malaysia. Public Health, 127, 710–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida Y., Ando F., Shimokata H., Sugiura S., Ueda H. et al. 2008. The effects of ageing on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 29, 176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar