Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5

References

• Beahan N., Kei J., Driscoll C., Charles B. & Khan A. 2012. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: A test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Ear Hear, 3, 104–11.
   Google Scholar
• Best V., Carlile S., Jin C. & Van Schaik A. 2005. The role of high frequencies in speech localization. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 353–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri R., Siegel J.H. & Wright B.A. 2011. Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 852–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burén M., Solem B.S. & Laukli E. 1992. Threshold of hearing (0.125–20 kHz) in children and youngsters. Br J Audiol, 26, 23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Seta E., Bertoli G.A. & Filipo R. 1985. High-frequency audiometry above 8 kHz. Comparative results of normative thresholds obtained with a headphone system and a quasi-free-field system. Audiology, 24, 254–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W.A., Hulst R.J.A.M., Tange R.A. & Urbanus N.A.M. 1985. The role of high-frequency audiometry in early detection of ototoxicity. Audiology, 24, 387–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausti S.A., Erickson D.A., Frey R.H., Rappaport B.Z. & Schechter M.A. 1981. The effects of noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8000 to 20 000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 1343–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausti S.A., Henry J.A., Hayden D., Phillips D.S. & Frey R.H. 1998. Intrasubject reliability of high-frequency (9–14 kHz) thresholds: Tested separately vs. following conventional-frequency testing. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 147–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank T. 1990. High-frequency hearing thresholds in young adults using a commercially available audiometer. Ear Hear, 11, 450–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank T. & Dreisbach L.E. 1991. Repeatability of high-frequency thresholds. Ear Hear, 12, 294–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank T. 2001. High-frequency (8–16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject thresholds variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone. Ear Hear, 22, 161–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon J.S., Phillips D.S., Helt W.J., Konrad-Martin D. & Fausti S.A. 2005. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 353–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössing P. & Richter U. 2003. Characteristic data of the circumaural earphone Sennheiser HDA 200 in the conventional and the extended high frequency range. In: U. Richter (ed.), Characteristics Data of Different Kinds of Earphones used in the Extended High Frequency Range for Pure-tone Audiometry. Braunschweig: PTB report PTB-MA-72.
   Google Scholar
• Green D.M., Kidd G. Jr. & Stevens K.N. 1987. High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 485–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallmo P., Borchgrevink H.M. & Mair I.W. 1995. Extended high-frequency thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol, 24, 47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han L.A. & Poulsen T. 1998. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz. Scand Audiol, 27, 105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-1, 1998. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear. Part 1: Ear simulator of the calibration of supra-aural earphones. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-2, 1998. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear. Part 2: An interim acoustic coupler for the calibration of audiometric earphones in the extended high-frequency range. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-5, 2006. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8 kHz to 16 kHz. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-9, 2007. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 9: Preferred test conditions for the determination of reference hearing threshold levels. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1, 1989. Acoustic - Audiometric test methods. Part 1: Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J., Dhar S., Abel R., Banakis R., Grolley E. et al. 2012. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration. Ear Hear, 3, 315–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter W., Schonfeld U., Mansmann U., Fischer R. & Gross M. 1998. Extended high frequency audiometry in pre-school children. Audiology, 37, 285–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter U. 2003. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels of the inserted earphones Etymotic Research ER-2A and ER-4A in the extended high-frequency range. In: U. Richter (ed.), Characteristics Data of Different Kinds of Earphones used in the Extended High Frequency Range for Pure-tone Audiometry. Braunschweig: PTB report PTB-MA-72.
   Google Scholar
• Richter U. 2003. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels of the supra-aural earphone KOSS HV/1A in the extended high-frequency range. In: U. Richter (ed.), Characteristics Data of Different Kinds of Earphones used in the Extended High Frequency Range for Pure-tone Audiometry. Braunschweig: PTB report PTB-MA-72.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Valiente A., Pérez Sanz C., Górriz C., Juárez A., Monfort M. et al. 2009. Designing a new tool for hearing exploration. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 60, 43–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodríguez Valiente A., Trinidad A., García Berrocal J.R., Górriz C. & Ramírez Camacho R. 2014. Extended high-frequency (9–20 kHz) audiometry reference thresholds in 645 healthy subjects. Int J Audiol, doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.893375.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter M.A., Fausti S.A., Rappaport B.Z. & Frey R.H. 1986. Age categorization of high-frequency auditory threshold data. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 767–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfeld U., Reuter W., Fischer R. & Gross M. 2003. Hearing thresholds of otologically normal subjects in the extended high-frequency range using the earphone HDA 200. In: U. Richter (ed.), Characteristics Data of Different Kinds of Earphones used in the Extended High Frequency Range for Pure-tone Audiometry. Braunschweig: PTB report PTB-MA-72.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw G.M., Jardine C.A. & Fridjhon P. 1996. A pilot investigation of high frequency audiometry in obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD) patients. Br J Audiol, 30, 233–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Beauchaine K.A., Kalberer A. & Jesteadt W. 1989. Normative thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 1384–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshima H., Hiraoka T., Kumagai M., Sone T. & Suzuki Y. 1995. Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for new earphones. In: Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 297–300.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley T.L., Cruickshanks K.J., Nondahl D.M., Tweed T.S. & Klein R. 1998. Aging and high-frequency hearing sensitivity. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 1061–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar