A longitudinal study of the bilateral benefit in children with bilateral cochlear implants

References

• Ashmead D.H., Davis D.L., Whalen T. & Odom R.D. 1991. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural time differences in human infants. Child Dev, 62, 1211–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp F., Eskilsson G. & Berninger E. 2011. Horizontal sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants: Effects of auditory experience and age at implantation. Otol Neurotol, 32, 558–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp F., Maki-Torkko E., Karltorp E., Harder H., Hergils L. et al. 2012. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: Speech recognition, sound localization, and parental reports. Int J Audiol, 51, 817–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs W.D. & Foreman D.L. 1980. Sound localization and early binaural experience in the deaf. Br J Audiol, 14, 41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beijen J.W., Snik A.F. & Mylanus E.A. 2007. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 28, 479–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess F.H., Tharpe A.M. & Gibler A.M. 1986. Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 7, 20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements M. & Kelly J.B. 1978. Auditory spatial responses of young guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) during and after ear blocking. J Comp Physiol Psychol, 92, 34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn H.S. 1977. Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 61, 525–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein J.F. 1992. Monaural versus binaural hearing: Ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort. Ear Hear, 13, 80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Hughes K.C. & Mok M. 2010. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant? Int J Audiol, 49, 368–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner M.B. & Gardner R.S. 1973. Problem of localization in the median plane: Effect of pinnae cavity occlusion. J Acoust Soc Am, 53, 400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers A.E. 2006. Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 64, 50–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godar S.P. & Litovsky R.Y. 2010. Experience with bilateral cochlear implants improves sound localization acuity in children. Otol Neurotol, 31, 1287–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K.A., Wong D.D. & Papsin B.C. 2013. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf. Brain, 136, 1609–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco-Calub T.M. & Litovsky R.Y. 2010. Sound localization skills in children who use bilateral cochlear implants and in children with normal acoustic hearing. Ear Hear, 31, 645–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco-Calub T.M., Litovsky R.Y. & Werner L.A. 2008. Using the observer-based psychophysical procedure to assess localization acuity in toddlers who use bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 29, 235–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothe B., Pecka M. & McAlpine D. 2010. Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiol Rev, 90, 983–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn-Inacker H., Shehata-Dieler W., Muller J. & Helms J. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants: A way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers M.J., van der Heijden G.J., Pourier V.E. & Grolman W. 2014. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Laryngoscope, 124, 1694–1699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y. 1997. Developmental changes in the precedence effect: Estimates of minimum audible angle. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 1739–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Johnstone P.M., Godar S., Agrawal S., Parkinson A. et al. 2006. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear, 27, 43–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett R.E., Kitterick P.T., Hewitt C.E. & Summerfield A.Q. 2009. Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: An observational study. Arch Dis Child, 95, 107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks J.C. & Green D.M. 1991. Sound localization by human listeners. Annu Rev Psychol, 42, 135–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok M., Galvin K.L., Dowell R.C. & McKay C.M. 2007. Spatial unmasking and binaural advantage for children with normal hearing, a cochlear implant and a hearing aid, and bilateral implants. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D.R. 1986. Critical periods for binaural interaction and spatial representation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 429, 51–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrongiello B.A. 1988. Infants” localization of sounds along the horizontal axis: Estimates of minimum audible angle. Dev Psychol, 24, 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrongiello B.A. & Rocca P.T. 1987. Infants” localization of sounds in the horizontal plane: Effects of auditory and visual cues. Child Dev, 58, 918–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J., Summerfield A.Q., O”Donoghue G.M. & Moore D.R. 2011. Spatial hearing of normally hearing and cochlear implanted children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 75, 489–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O”Neil J.N., Connelly C.J., Limb C.J. & Ryugo D.K. 2011. Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience. Hear Res, 279, 118–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters B.R., Litovsky R., Parkinson A. & Lake J. 2007. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 28, 649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsbury H.C., Grose J.H. & Hall J.W. 3rd. 1991. Otitis media with effusion in children. Binaural hearing before and after corrective surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, 718–723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popescu M.V. & Polley D.B. 2010. Monaural deprivation disrupts development of binaural selectivity in auditory midbrain and cortex. Neuron, 65, 718–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley K.G. & McGregor K.K. 2012. Noise hampers children”s expressive word learning. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 43, 325–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer E.C., Amlani A.M., Seibold A. & Shattuck P.L. 2007. A meta- analytic comparison of binaural benefits between bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 760–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf F., Van Deun L., van Wieringen A., Wouters J., Desloovere C. et al. 2009. Three-year postimplantation auditory outcomes in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 118, 336–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl A.H. & Grothe B. 2005. Development of sound localization mechanisms in the mongolian gerbil is shaped by early acoustic experience. J Neurophysiol, 94, 1028–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery W.H. 3rd & Middlebrooks J.C. 1994. Monaural sound localization: Acute versus chronic unilateral impairment. Hear Res, 75, 38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparreboom M., van Schoonhoven J., van Zanten B.G., Scholten R.J., Mylanus E.A. et al. 2010. The effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in children: A systematic review. Otol Neurotol, 31, 1062–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens T., Lesinski-Schiedat A., Strutz J., Aschendorff A., Klenzner T. et al. 2008. The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children. Acta Otolaryngol, 128, 164–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G.A. 1985. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wackym P.A., Runge-Samuelson C.L., Firszt J.B., Alkaf F.M. & Burg L.S. 2007. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 28, 80S–85S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., van Wieringen A., Scherf F., Deggouj N., Desloovere C. et al. 2009. Earlier intervention leads to better sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol, 15, 7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., van Wieringen A., Van den Bogaert T., Scherf F., Offeciers F.E. et al. 2009. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 30, 178–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deun L., van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2010. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 31, 702–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R.J. & Litovsky R.Y. 2011. Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 4082–4088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C., Bebear J.P., Radafy E., Vaneecloo F.M., Ruzza I. et al. 2012. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: Localization and hearing- in-noise benefits. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 858–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar