Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension

References

• Baddeley A.D. 1996. The concept of working memory. In: S. Gathercole (ed.), Models of Short-term Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Besser J., Koelewijn T., Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E. & Festen J.M. 2013. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise: A review. Trends Amplif, 17, 75–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best V., Keidser G., Buchholz J.M. & Freeston K. 2015. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment. Int J Audiol, early online, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke M. 2006. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1562–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon M.S., Daneman M. & Schneider B.A. 2009. Comprehension of speeded discourse by younger and older listeners. Exp Aging Res, 35, 277–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafter E.R, Xia J. & Kalluri S. 2013. A naturalistic approach to the cocktail party problem. In: B.C.J. Moore, R.D. Patterson, I.M. Winter, R.P. Carlyon & H.E. Gockel (eds.) Basic Aspects of Hearing: Physiology and Perception. New York: Springer, pp. 527–534.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. & Dubno J.R. 2010. Factors affecting speech understanding in older adults. In: S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (eds.) The Aging Auditory System. New York: Springer, pp. 211–257.
   Google Scholar
• Jakeman V. & McDowell C. 1995. Cambridge English IELTS 1 with Answers: Authentic Examination Papers from Cambridge ESOL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. & Elliott L.L. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 61, 1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil R.J., Genther D.J. & Lin F.R. 2015. Factors associated with the accuracy of subjective assessments of hearing impairment. Ear Hear, 36, 164–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kei J. & Smyth V. 1997. Measuring the ability of hearing impaired children to understand connected discourse: A comparison of two methods. Br J Audiol, 31, 283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kei J., Smyth V., Burge E., Fernando S., Fiteni R. et al. 2003. Measuring the ability of children to understand everyday speech using computer technology: A normative study. Asia Pacific J Speech, Lang Hear Res, 8, 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Ching T., Dillon H., Agung K., Brew C. et al. 2002. The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) CDs of speech and noise for hearing-aid evaluation: Normative data and potential applications. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 24, 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Dillon H., Convery E. & Mejia J. 2013a. Factors influencing inter-individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 955–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Dillon H., Mejia J. & Nguyen C.V. 2013b. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function. Int J Audiol, 52, 795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Walravens E. & Mejia J. 2014. Is a non-auditory profile associated with bilateral directional processing benefit in challenging listening situations? IHCON. Lake Tahoe, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd G., Jr. Mason C.R., Richards V.M., Gallun F.J. & Durlach N.I. 2008. Informational masking. In: W.A. Yost, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (eds.) Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. New York: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, pp. 143–189.
   Google Scholar
• Light L.L. & Anderson P.A. 1985. Working memory capacity, age, and memory for discourse. J. Gerontology, 40, 737–747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lunner T., Rudner M. & Rönnberg J. 2009. Cognition and hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 395–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson A. & Akeroyd M. 2013. The Glasgow monitoring of uninterrupted speech task (GMUST): A naturalistic measure of speech intelligibility in noise Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (POMA). Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Miller G.A. & Licklider J.C.R. 1950. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 22, 167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy D.R., Daneman M. & Schneider B.A. 2006. Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychol Aging, 21, 49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyborg L., Backman L., Erngrund K., Olofsson U. & Nilsson L.-G. 1996. Age differences in episodic memory, semantic memory, and priming: Relationships to demographic, intellectual, and biological factors. J Gerontology: Psych Sci, 51B, 234–240.
   Google Scholar
• Percy V., Raymond B., Smith A., Joseph C., Kronk L. et al. 2013. Measuring speech perception abilities in adults with cochlear implants: Comprehension versus speech recognition. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 33, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2007. Audition and cognition: What audiologists need to know about listening. In: C. Palmer & R. Seewald (eds.), Hearing Care for Adults. Stäfa, Switzerland: Phonak, pp. 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A. & Daneman M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J. 2003. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. Int J Audiol, 42, S68–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Zekveld A., Sörqvist P., Danielsson H. et al. 2013. The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci, 13, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Salthouse T.A., Hancock H.E., Meinz E.J. & Hambrick D.Z. 1996. Interrelations of age, visual acuity, and cognitive functioning. J Gerontology B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 51, 317–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Daneman M., Murphy D. & See S. 2000. Listening to discourse in distracting settings: The effects of aging. Psychol Aging, 15, 110–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B.A., Pichora-Fuller M.K. & Daneman M. 2010. Effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. In: S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper & R.R. Fay (eds.), The Aging Auditory System. New York: Springer, pp. 167–210.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers M.S., Hale S., Myerson J., Rose N., Tye-Murray N. et al. 2011. Listening comprehension across the adult lifespan. Ear Hear, 32, 775–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Sommers M., Spehar B., Myerson J., Hale S. et al. 2008. Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions. Int J Audiol, 47, S31–S37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann F.A. & Hill N.J. 2001. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness-of-fit. Perc Psych, 63, 1293–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., Poon L.W., Lombardi L. & Lowe D. 1985. Speed of processing in normal aging: Effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. J Gerontology, 40, 579–585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield A. & Tun P. 2007. Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 548–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar