Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 54, 2015 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
104
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss

Richard H. WilsonVA Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee and East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USACorrespondence[email protected]
&
Staci E. IrishVA Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee and East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, USA
Pages 933-941 | Received 26 Jan 2015, Accepted 24 May 2015, Published online: 07 Aug 2015

References

  • American National Standards Institute. 2010. Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2010 New York.
  • Ardoint M., Green T. & Rosen S. 2014. The intelligibility of interrupted speech depends upon its uninterrupted intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 136(4), el275–el280.
  • Causey G.D., Hood L.J., Hermanson C.L. & Bowling L.S. 1984. The Maryland CNC test: Normative studies. Audiol, 23, 552–568.
  • Cherry E.C. 1953. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 25(5), 975–979.
  • Department of Veterans Affairs. 2006. Speech recognition and identification materials. Disc 4.0. Mountain Home, (USA): VA Medical Center.
  • Dirks D.D., Wilson R.H. & Bower D.R. 1969. Effect of pulsed masking on selected speech materials. J Acoust Soc Am, 46(4), 898–906.
  • Egan J.P. 1948. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 955–991.
  • Fogerty D. & Kewley-Port D. 2009. Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 126(2), 847–857.
  • Grosjean F. 1980. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Percep Psychophys, 28(4), 267–283.
  • Howard‐Jones P.A. & Rosen S. 1993. Uncomodulated glimpsing in ‘checkerboard’ noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 93(5), 2915–2922.
  • Huggins A.W.F. 1964. Distortion of the temporal pattern of speech: Interruption and alternation. J Acoust Soc Am, 36, 1055–1064.
  • Jin S.H. & Nelson P.B. 2006. Speech perception in gated noise: The effects of temporal resolution. J Acoust Soc Am, 119(5), 3097–3108.
  • Kidd G.R. & Humes L.E. 2012. Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences. J Acoust Soc Am, 131(2), 1434–1448.
  • Krull V., Humes L.E. & Kidd G.R. 2013. Reconstructing wholes from parts: Effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition. Ear Hear, 34(2), e14–e23.
  • Lehiste I. & Peterson G.E. 1959. Linguistic considerations in the study of speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 31(3), 280–286.
  • Miller G.A. 1947. The masking of speech. Psychol Bull, 44(2), 105–129.
  • Miller G.A. & Licklider J.C.R. 1950. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 22(2), 167–173.
  • Nelson P.B., Jin S.H., Carney A.E. & Nelson D.A. 2003. Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 113(2), 961–968.
  • Peterson G.E. & Lehiste I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis, 27(1), 62–70.
  • Powers G.L. & Speaks C. 1973. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 54(3), 661–667.
  • Reinisch E., Jesse A. & McQueen J.M. 2010. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Quart J Exp Psychol, 63(4), 772–783.
  • Tillman T.W. & Carhart R. 1966. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Brooks Air Force Base, TX USAF School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report.
  • Studebaker G.A. 1985. A ʽrationalized’ arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, 28(3), 455–462.
  • Wang X. & Humes L.E. 2010. Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 128(4), 2100–2111.
  • Wilson R.H. 2014. Variables that influence the recognition performance of interrupted words: Rise-fall shape and temporal location of the interruptions. J Am Acad Audiol, 25(7), 688–696.
  • Wilson R.H. & Carhart R. 1969. Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. J Acoust Soc Am, 46(4), 998–1010.
  • Wilson R.H. & Hamm H.M. 2015. Recognition performance of interrupted monosyllabic words: The effects of 10 interruption locations. J Am Acad Audiol, 26(7), 670–677.
  • Wilson R.H. & McArdle R. 2015. The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials. J Am Acad Audiol, 26(4), 331–345.
  • Wilson R.H., McArdle R., Bentacourt M.B., Herring K., Lipton T. et al. 2010. Word recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 21(2), 90–109.
  • Wingfield A., Aberdeen J.S. & Stine E.A. 1991. Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults. J Gerontol, 46(3), P127–P129.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.