Evaluation of a wireless audio streaming accessory to improve mobile telephone performance of cochlear implant users

References

• Adams J.S., Hasenstab M.S., Pippin G.W. & Sismanis A. 2004. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants. ENT: Ear Nose Throat J, 83, 96–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson I., Baumgartner W., Boheim K., Nahler A., Arnolder A. et al. 2006. Telephone use: What benefit do cochlear implant users receive? Int J Audiol, 45, 446–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkany T., Hodges A., Menapace C., Hazard L., Driscoll C. et al. 2007. Nucleus Freedom North American Freedom clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 136, 757–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A sentence test of speech perception: Reliability, set equivalence, and short-term learning. Internal Report RCI 10. New York: Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Center, City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Carmel E., Kronenberg J., Wolf M. & Migirov L. 2011. Telephone use among cochlear implanted children. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 131(2), 156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro A., Lassaletta L., Bastarrica M., Prim M., Sarriá M. et al. 2006. Comparison of different mobile telephones in Combi40 users. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 126(7), 714–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro A., Lassaletta L., Bastarrica M., Perez-Mora R., Sarriá M. et al. 2008. Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40 cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 128(6), 661–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen N., Waltzman S. & Shapiro W. 1989. Telephone speech comprehension with use of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 142, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cray J.W., Allen R.L., Stuart A., Hudson S., Layman E. et al. 2004. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol, 13, 200–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desjardins J.L. & Doherty K. 2009. Do experienced hearing-aid users know how to use their hearing aids correctly? Am J Audiol, 18(1), 69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M., Dove H., Parkin J., Zacharchuk S. & Dankowski K. 1991. Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 12(5), 368–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap W.P., Cortina J.M., Vaslow J.B. & Burke M.J. 1996. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Meth, 1, 170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo J., Lassaletta L., Mora R.P., Castro A., Bastarrica M. et al. 2013. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users. Euro Arch ORL, 270(4), 1223–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford R.H., Shallop J.K. & Peterson A.M. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurotol, 13, 193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges L.V. & Olkin I. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helms J., Weichbold V., Baumann U., von Specht H., Schon F. et al. 2004. Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 66(3), 130–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y., Tahmina Q., Runge C. & Friedland D.R. 2013. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Trends Hear, 17(3), 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito J., Nakatake M. & Fujita S. 1999. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryng Head Neck Sur, 121, 802–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma-Spytek L. & Harkins J. 2005. An evaluation of digital cellular handsets by hearing aid users. J Rehab Res Dev, 42, 145–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H., Harkins J., Singer B. & Young E. 2001. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 275–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mantokoudis G., Dahler C., Dubach P., Kompis M. & Caversaccio M. 2013. Internet video telephony allows speech reading by deaf individuals and improves speech perception by cochlear implant users. PLoS One, 8(1). e54770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mantokoudis G., Dubach P., Pfiffner F., Kompis M. & Caversaccio M. 2012. Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals. J Med Internet Res, 14(4), e102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milchard A. & Cullington H. 2004. An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol, 43(6), 356–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95(2), 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson G. & Lehiste I. 1962. Revised CNC list for auditory testing. J Speech Hear Disord, 27, 62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picou E. & Ricketts T. 2013. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 24(1), 59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer E.C. & Thibodeau L. 2006. Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements. Am J Audiol, 15, 114–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlegel R.E., Ravindran A.R., Raman S. & Grant H. 2001. Wireless telephone-hearing aid electromagnetic compatibility research at the University of Oklahoma. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 301–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skopec M. 1998. Hearing aid electromagnetic interference from digital wireless telephones. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 6, 235–239.
   Google Scholar
• Sorri M., Huttunen K., Välimaa T., Karinen P. & Löppönen H. 2001. Cochlear implants and GSM phones. Scand Audiol, 30(1), 54–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P., Pittman A., Hoover B. & Lewis D. 2001. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of/s /in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2183–2183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 2014. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201407.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uziel A., Sillon M., Vieu A., Artieres F., Piron J. et al. 2007. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 28(5), 615–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar