Normative data on audiovisual speech integration using sentence recognition and capacity measures

References

• Altieri N. & Hudock D. 2014a. Assessing variability in audiovisual speech integration skills using capacity and accuracy measures. Int J Audiol, 53, 710–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N. & Hudock D. 2014b. Hearing impairment and audiovisual speech integration ability: A case study report. Front Psychol, 5, 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altieri N., Pisoni D.B. & Townsend J.T. 2011. Some normative data on lip-reading skills. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N. & Townsend J.T. 2011. An assessment of behavioral dynamic information processing measures in audiovisual speech perception Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N., Townsend J.T. & Wenger M.J. 2014. A measure for assessing the effects of audiovisual speech integration. Behav Res Methods, 46, 406–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N. & Wenger M. 2013. Neural dynamics of audiovisual integration efficiency under variable listening conditions. Front Psychol, 4, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent T., Buchwald A. & Pisoni D.B. 2009. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 2660–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent T., Loebach J.L., Phillips L., & Pisoni D.B. 2011. Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1607–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson T.R. & Pisoni D.B. 2004. Audiovisual speech perception in deaf adults and children following cochlear implantation. In: G. Calvert, C. Spence & B.E. Stein (eds.), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 749–771.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short Term Learning (internal report RCI 10). New York: City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow A.R., Toretta G.M. & Pisoni D.B. 1996. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Commun, 20, 255–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braida L.D. 1991. Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 647–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey A.L. & Lee H.B. 1992. A First Course in Factor Analysis (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. 2003. Use of hearing aids by older people: Influence of non-auditory factors (vision, manual dexterity). Int J Audiol, 42, 2S21–2S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J.K., MacCallum R.C. & Tait M. 1986. The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Pers Psychol, 39, 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W., Walden B.E. & Seitz P.F. 1998. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 2677–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W., Grose J.H., Buss E. & Dev M.B. 2002. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children. Ear Hear, 23, 159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn J. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houpt J.W., Townsend J.T. & Donkin C. 2014. A new perspective on visual word processing efficiency. Acta Psychol (Amst), 145, 118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro D.W. 2004. From multisensory integration to talking heads and language learning. In: G. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (eds.), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. pp. 153–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R., Thapar A. & McKoon G. 2001. The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychol Aging, 16, 323–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remensnyder, L.S. 2012. Audiologists as gatekeepers: And it’s not just for hearing loss. Audiol Today, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sherffert S., Lachs L. & Hernandez L.R. 1997. The Hoosier audiovisual multi-talker database. In: Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No.21. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers M., Tye-Murray N. & Spehar B. 2005. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear Hear, 26, 263–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson R.A., Sarko D.K., Nidiffer A.R., Ghose D., Fister J et al. 2014. Identifying and quantifying multisensory integration: A tutorial review. Brain Topogr, 27, 707–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby W.H. & Pollack I. 1954. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 26, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Altieri N. 2012. An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions. Psychol Rev, 119, 500–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Nozawa G. 1995. Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial and coactive theories. J Math Psychol, 39, 321–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Wenger M.J. 2004. A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychol Rev, 111, 1003–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Sommers M. & Spehar B. 2007. Audiovisual integration and lip-reading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear, 28, 656–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winneke A.H. & Phillips N.A. 2011. Does audiovisual speech offer a fountain of youth for old ears? An event-related brain potential study of age differences in audiovisual speech perception. Psychol Aging, 26, 427–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar