Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response

References

• Bruhn E. 2012. Effects of subject activity on the auditory brainstem response measured with two different recording instruments. (Unpublished doctoral project, University of Kansas Medical Center).
   Google Scholar
• Chan F.H.Y., Lam F.K., Poon P.W.F. & Qiu W. 1995. Detection of brainstem auditory evoked potential by adaptive filtering. Med Biol Eng Comput, 33, 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertoff M., Lichtenhan J. & Willis M. 2010. Click- and chirp-evoked human compound action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 2992–2996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W. & Clark G.M. 1991. A comparison of steady‐state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 90, 2467–2479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, B. & Norrix, L.W. 2015. Measuring the advantage of Kalman-weighted averaging for ABR hearing evaluation in infants. Am J Audiol, 24, 153–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1998. Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3482–3488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, J. & Ferraro, J. 1999. Short-latency auditory evoked potentials: electrocochleography and auditory brainstem response. In F. Musiek, W. Rintelmann (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment (pp. 197–242). Needham Heights (MA): Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C. & Don M. 2008. Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am., 124, 3022–3037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Don M., Cebulla M. & Stürzebecher E. 2007. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am., 122, 2772–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V. & Pantev C. 2000. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear Res, 148, 153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firsching R., Luther J., Eidelberg E., Brown W.E., Story J.L. & Boop F.A. 1987. 40 Hz-middle latency auditory evoked response in comatose patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 67, 213–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogerty D., Kewley-Port D. & Humes L.E. 2012. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 1667–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogerty D. & Humes L.E. 2012. The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 1490–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S. & Talmachoff P.J. 1981. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 78, 2643–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.A. & Jesteadt W. 1988. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res, 31, 87–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Bergman B., Beauchaine K.L., Kaminski J.R., et al. 1993. Otoacoustic emissions from normal hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 2050–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. & Swanepoel D.W. (2009). Objective Assessment of Hearing. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M. & Picton T.W. 2002. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr, 15, 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, M.L. 2005. Newborn hearing screening programs: overview. J Otolaryngol, 34, S70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J. 1970. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 92, 311.
   Google Scholar
• John M.S., Brown D.K., Muir P.J. & Picton T.W. 2004. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear, 25, 539–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K. 2012. Universal newborn hearing screening in the NICU population using new features of the Vivosonic Integrity ABR unit: assessing the correlation coefficient as a function of the number of sweeps collected. (Unpublished doctoral project, University of Kansas Medical Center).
   Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A. & Danesh A.A. 2008. Air-conduction auditory steady-state response: comparison of interchannel recording using two modulation frequencies. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 696–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A., Mohamed E.S. & Elshafiey H. 2014. 40-Hz sinusoidal ASSR and TB-ABR thresholds in detecting mild conductive hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion. Oral presentation at the HEAL 2014: Hearing Across the Lifespan Conference, Cernobbio, Lake Como, Italy (June 5-7, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Korczak P., Smart J., Delgado R.M., Strobel T. & Bradford C. 2012. Auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 146–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Anderson J.S., Batra R., Fitzpatrick D.C., Teissier N. & D'Angelo W.R. 2002. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 188–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laukli E., Fjermedal O. & Mair I.W. 1988. Low-frequency auditory brainstem response threshold. Scand Audiol, 17, 171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenhan J.T., Cooper N.P. & Guinan J.J. 2013. A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept. Ear Hear, 34, 42–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenhan J.T., Hartsock J.J., Gill R.M., Guinan J.J. & Salt A.N. 2014. The auditory nerve overlapped waveform (ANOW) originates in the cochlear apex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 15, 395–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R.D., Picton T.W., Hamel G. & Campbell K.B. 1987. Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 66, 145–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luts H., Van Dun B., Alaerts J. & Wouters J. 2008. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 29, 638–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoux A.M. 2011. Maturation of auditory function related to hearing threshold estimations using the auditory brainstem response during infancy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 75, 163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozza R.J. 1995. Estimating the contribution of non-sensory factors to infant-adult differences in behavioral thresholds. Hear Res, 91, 72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdamar Ö. & Delgado R.E. 1996. Measurement of signal and noise characteristics in ongoing auditory brainstem response averaging. Ann Biomed Eng, 24, 702–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry G., Hacking C., Bamford J. & Day J. 2003. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants. Int J Audiol, 42, 413–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Van Roon P. & John M.S. 2009. Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate. Int Ear Hear, 30, 100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeser R.J., Valente M. & Hosford-Dunn H. 2007. Audiology: Diagnosis (Volume 1). New York, NY: Thieme Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salt A.N. & Vora A.R. 1990. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials. Audiology, 29, 135–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmida M.J., Peterson H.J. & Tharpe A.M. 2003. Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital video disc and conventional reinforcers. Am J Audiol, 12, 35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherf F., Brokx J., Wuyts F.L. & Van de Hyening P.H. 2006. The ASSR: Clinical application in normal hearing & hearing-impaired infants & adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR & pure tone audiometry. Int J Audiol, 45, 281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S. 2007. The use of auditory brainstem response in screening for hearing loss and audiometric threshold prediction. In R.F Burkard, J.J Eggermont, M Don (Eds). Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application (pp. 254–274). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Sininger Y.S. & Abdala C. 1996. Hearing threshold as measured by auditory brain stem response in human neonates. Ear Hear, 17, 395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol J. & Hyde M. 2002. Hearing screening. Pediatr Rev, 23, 155–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sokolov, Y., Kurtz, I., Steinman, A., Long, G. & Sokolova, O. (2006). Integrity technology: Enabling Practical ABR. Vivosonic, Inc. Retrieved from vivosonic.com.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov Y., Kurtz I., Steinman A., Long G. & Sokolova O. (2009). Non-sedated ABR techniques. Vivosonic, Inc. Presented at EHDI Conference. Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Spoor A. & Eggermont J.J. (1976). Electrocochleography as a method for objective audiogram determination. In SK Hirsch, DH Eldredge, IJ Hirsch, SR Silverman (Eds). Hearing and Davis: Essays Honoring Hallow ell Davis (pp. 411–418). Saint Louis, MO: Washington University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spydell J.D., Pattee G. & Goldie W.D. 1985. The 40 Hertz auditory event-related potential: normal values and effects of lesions. Electroenc Clin Neuro, 62, 193–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapells D.R. & Oates P. 1997. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol. Neurootol. , 2, 257–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. 2000. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked auditory brainstem response: a literature meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 24, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmann I. & Gutschalk A. 2011. Potential fMRI correlates of 40-Hz phase locking in primary auditory cortex, thalamus and midbrain. Neuroimage, 54, 495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stueve M.P. & O’Rourke C. 2003. Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady-state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods. Am J Audiol, 12, 125–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomlin D., Rance G., Graydon K. & Tsialios I. 2006. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Int J Audiol, 45, 580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlumak A., Rubinstein E. & Durrant J. 2007. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Int J Audiol, 46, 692–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Reijden C., Mens L.H.M. & Snik A.F.M. 2006. Frequency-specific objective audiometry: tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli. Int J Audiol, 45, 40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol, 44, 613–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B. 1979. The relation between the compound action potential and unit discharges in the auditory nerve. (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Westhuizen C. 2010. The clinical utility of the Vivosonic Integrity auditory brainstem response system in children with cerebral palsy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa).
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler J.K. 2011. The effect of Kalman-weighted filtering and in-situ pre-amplification on the accuracy and efficiency of ABR threshold estimation. (Doctoral dissertation, James Madison University).
   Google Scholar
• Wiegers J.S. (2013). Utility of Vivosonic Integrity ABR system as a hearing screening device for children who are difficult to test. (Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ohio State University).
   Google Scholar