Average optimal DPOAE primary tone levels in normal-hearing adults

References

• Abdala C. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 3726–3740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boege P. & Janssen T. 2002. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1810–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke S.R., Rogers A.R., Neely S.T., Kopun J.G., Tan H. et al. 2010. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance. Ear Hear, 31, 533–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn P.A., Piskorski P., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. & Keefe D.H. 1999. Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear Hear, 20, 149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill S.A. & Brown A.M. 1990. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 821–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman S. & Dirks D.D. 1986. Acoustics of ear canal measurement of eardrum SPL in simulators. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 783–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Bergman B., Beauchaine K.L., Kaminski J.R. et al. 1993. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 2050–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Dorn P.A. & Hoover B.M. 2003. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 3275–3284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Ohlrich B., Hoover B., Redner J. et al. 1997. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 18, 440–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F.P., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Stagner B.B., Coats A.C. & Martin G.K. 1989. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. 1979. IEC 60655 - Values for the Difference between free-Field and Pressure Sensitivity Levels for one-Inch Standard Condenser Microphones. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen T., Gehr D.D., Klein A. & Muller J. 2005. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 2969–2979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson T.A., Neely S.T., Garner C.A. & Gorga M.P. 2006a. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 418–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson T.A., Neely S.T., Kopun J.G., Dierking D.M., Tan H. et al. 2007. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 3539–3553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson T.A., Neely S.T., Kopun J.G., Dierking D.M., Tan H. et al. 2010. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions. Ear Hear, 31, 74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson T.A., Neely S.T., Kopun J.G. & Gorga M.P. 2006b. Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 3896–3907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D.O., Paparello J., Jung M.D., Smurzynski J. & Sun X. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. Acta Otolaryngol, 116, 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby B.J., Kopun J.G., Tan H., Neely S.T. & Gorga M.P. 2011. Do “ optimal” conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance? Ear Hear, 32, 230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer P., Janssen T. & Arnold W. 1998. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 3431–3444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer P., Janssen T., Hulin P. & Arnold W. 2000. Optimal L(1)-L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans. Hear Res, 146, 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer P., Schuster E.M., Rosanowski F., Eysholdt U. & Lohscheller J. 2006. [The influence of conductive hearing loss on DPOAE-threshold. The effect of an individually optimized stimulation]. Hno, 54, 457–464. 466-457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. & Baran J.A. 1997. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: hit and false-positive rates in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Am J Otol, 18, 454–461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neely S.T. & Gorga M.P. 1998. Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 2925–2934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely S.T. & Gorga M.P. 2010. Forward‐pressure level for in‐the‐ear calibration. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1868–1868.
   Google Scholar
• Neely S.T., Johnson T.A. & Gorga M.P. 2005. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1248–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D.A. & Kimberley B.P. 1992. Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 1142–1159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olzowy B., Deppe C., Arpornchayanon W., Canis M., Strieth S. et al. 2010. Quantitative estimation of minor conductive hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 1845–1852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald J.A. & Janssen T. 2003. Weighted DPOAE input/output-functions: a tool for automatic assessment of hearing loss in clinical application. Z Med Phys, 13, 93–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichenbach T. & Hudspeth A.J. 2014. The physics of hearing: fluid mechanics and the active process of the inner ear. Rep Prog Phys, 77, 076601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuven M.L., Neely S.T., Kopun J.G., Rasetshwane D.M., Allen J.B. et al. 2013. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz. Ear Hear, 34, 779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers A.R., Burke S.R., Kopun J.G., Tan H., Neely S.T. et al. 2010. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction. Ear Hear, 31, 546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roup C.M., Wiley T.L., Safady S.H. & Stoppenbach D.T. 1998. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol, 7, 55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Recio A., Narayan S.S. & Robles L. 1997. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2151–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer L.A., Withnell R.H., Dhar S., Lilly D.J., Goodman S.S. et al. 2003. Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity. Ear Hear, 24, 367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel J.H. & Hirohata E.T. 1994. Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res, 80, 146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. & Montoya D. 1996. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 956–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suckfull M., Schneeweiss S., Dreher A. & Schorn K. 1996. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol, 116, 528–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner W., Heppelmann G., Vonthein R. & Zenner H.P. 2008. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 29, 378–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M.L., McCoy M.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. & Martin G.K. 1995. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2346–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young J.A., Elliott S.J. & Lineton B. 2012. Investigating the wave-fixed and place-fixed origins of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission within a micromechanical cochlear model. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 4699–4709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar