Static magnetic field of 6 mT induces apoptosis and alters cell cycle in p53 mutant Jurkat cells

References

• Aldinucci C., Garcia J. B., Palmi M., . 2003. The effect of strong static magnetic field on lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics. 24:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson L. V. B.. 1996. Optimised protein diagnosis in the autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. Neuromusc. Disord.. 6:443–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist C., Kastan M. B.. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimmer dissociation. Nature. 421:499–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian X., Hughes F. M.Jr., Huang Y., . 1997. Roles of cytoplasmic Ca2 and intracellular Ca2 stores in induction and suppression of apoptosis in S49 cells. Amer. J. Phys.. 272:1241–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Brune B.. 2003. Nitric oxide: NO apoptosis or turning it ON?. Cell Death Diff.. 10:864–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canman C. E., Lim D. S., Cimprich K. A., . 1998. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science. 281:1677–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chionna A., Dwikat M., Panzarini E., . 2003. Cell shape and plasma membrane alterations after static magnetic fields exposure. Eur. J. Histoch.. 47:299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chionna A., Tenuzzo B., Panzarini E., . 2005. Time dependent modifications of Hep G2 cells during exposure to static magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 26:275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini L., Abbro L.. 2005. Bioeffects of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields. Micron. 36:195–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli C., Coppola S., Barone R., . 1999. Magnetic fields increase cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis via modulation of Ca++influx. FASEB J.. 13:95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores E. R., Tsai K. Y., Crowley D., . 2002. p63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Nature. 416:560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli C., Meucci O., Scorziello A., . 1995. Apoptosis in cerebellar granule cells is blocked by high KCl, forskolin, and IGF-1through distinct mechanisms of action: the involvement of intracellular calcium and RNA synthesis. J. Neurosci.. 15:1172–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes C. A., Linden R.. 2004. Programmed cell death, apoptosis and alternative death styles. Eur. J. Biochem.. 271:1638–1650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jajte J. M.. 2000. Programmed cell death as a biological function of electromagnetic fields at a frequency of (50/60 Hz). Med. Pr.. 51:383–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jajte J., Grzegorczyk J., Zmyślony M., Rajkowska E.. 2002. Effect of 7 mT static magnetic field and iron ions on rat lymphocytes: apoptosis, necrosis and free radical processes. Bioelectrochemistry. 57:107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J., Ha C. S., Lee H. J., Song K.. 2010. Repetitive exposure to a 60-Hz time varying magnetic field induces DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. 400:739–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H., Singh N. P.. 2004. Magnetic field induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat. Environ. Health Perspect.. 112:687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnelli L., Cinelli M., Turchetti A., Chiarugi V. P.. 1994. Bcl-2 overexpression abolishes early calcium waving preceding apoptosis in NIH-3T3 murine fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. 204:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli F., La Sala D., Cicciotti G., . 2004. Exposure to 900 Mhz electromagnetic field induces an unbalance between pro-apoptotic and pro-survival signals in T-lymphoblastoid leukaemia CCRF-CEM cells. J. Cell. Physiol.. 198:479–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey D. J., Nicotera P., Hartzell P., . 1989. Glucocorticoids activate a suicide process in thymocytes through an elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.. 269:365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira M. E., Barcinski M. A.. 2004. Apoptotic cell and phagocyte interplay: Recognition and consequences in different cell systems. Ann. Acad. Brasil Sci.. 76:93–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson D. W., Thornberry N. A.. 1997. Caspases: Killer proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci.. 22:299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers J. T., Hong S., Mayhew C. N., . 2004. E2F1 uses the ATM signaling pathway to induce p53 and chk2 phosphorylation and apoptosis. Mol. Cancer Res.. 2:203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen M. S., Rosen A. D.. 1990. Magnetic field influence on Paramecium motility. Life Sci.. 46:1509–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen A. D.. 2003. Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1282:149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens R. G.. 2004. Electromagnetic fields and free radicals. Environ. Health Perspect.. 112:687–694.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szatrowski T. P., Nathan C. F.. 1991. Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells. Cancer Res.. 51:794–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenuzzo B., Vergallo C., Dini L.. 2009. Effect of 6 mT static magnetic field on the bcl-2, bax, p53 and hsp70 expression in freshly isolated and in vitro aged human lymphocytes. Tissue Cell. 41:169–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodori L., Gohde W., Valente M. G., . Static magnetic fields affect calcium fluxes and inhibit stressinduced apoptosis in human glioblastoma cells. Cytometry. 2002a; 49:143–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teodori L., Grabarek J., Smolewski P., . Exposure of cells to static magnetic fields accelerates loss of integrity of plasma membrane during apoptosis. Cytometry. 2002b; 49:113–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urist M., Tanaka T., Poyurovsky M. V., Prives C.. 2004. p73 induction after DNA damage is regulated by checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2. Genes Dev.. 18:3041–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar