Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation exposure inside the metro tube infrastructure in Warszawa

References

• Ahlbom, A., Feychting, M., Green, A., et al. ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology. (2009). Epidemiology evidence on mobile phones and tumor risk: A review. Epidemiology. 20:639–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortkiewicz, A., Gadzicka, E., Szymczak, W., Zmyślony, M. (2012). Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis in radio and TV broadcasting stations workers. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 25:446–455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union Recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz), 1999/519/EC, OJ. 1999; L 199/59
   Google Scholar
• Gajsek, P., Ravazzani, P., Wiart, J., et al. (2015). Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz). J. Expos. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 25:37–44. doi:10.1038/jes.2013.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryz, K., Karpowicz, J., Leszko, W. (2012). Exposimeters of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation – An overview of functional and technical parameters. Bezpiecz Pr. 2:12–15. [in Polish]
   Google Scholar
• Gryz, K., Karpowicz, J., Molenda, M., Patryk Zradziński, P. (2007). Exposure to electromagnetic fields in electrical vehicles of urban transportation. Bezpiecz Pr. 7–8:24–27. [in Polish]. Available from: http://www.ciop.pl/CIOPPortalWAR/file/25608/2013031212533&bezp_07_2007_s_24_27.pdf (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Gryz, K., Karpowicz, J., Leszko, W., Zradziński, P. (2014a). Evaluation of exposure to electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation in the indoor workplace accessible to the public by the use of frequency-selective exposimeters. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 27:1043–1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryz, K., Karpowicz, J., Leszko, W., Zradziński, P. (2014b). The frequency-selective evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation in the public accessible indoor environment. Proceedings of EMC Europe 2014, September 1–14, Gothenburg, Sweden. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6930936 (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Gryz, K., Zradziński, P., Karpowicz, J. (2015). The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98–2450 MHz and compliance analysis – Evaluation by virtual measurements. BioMed. Res. Int. Article ID 272460, 12 pages. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272460 (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Hansson Mild, K., Alanko, T., Decat, G., et al. (2009). Exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields. A review of open questions on exposure assessment techniques. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 15:3–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Soderqvist, F., et al. (2008). Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. Int. J. Oncol. 32:1097–1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (2011). Classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Lyon, France, May 31, 2011, The World Health Organization (WHO)/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Press Release nr 208
   Google Scholar
• IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (2013). Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lyon, France, 2013, The WHO/IARC, IARC Monographs, Volume 102
   Google Scholar
• ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Radiation Protection). (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 74:494–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP (International Commision on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). (2009). Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz–300  GHz). Review of the scientific evidence on dosimetry, biological effects, epidemiological observations, and health consequences concerning exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). 16
   Google Scholar
• INTERPHONE Study Group. (2010). Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 39:675–694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, M., Zaryabova, V., Ivanova, M. (2013). Electromagnetic field occupational exposure: Non-thermal vs. thermal effects. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 32:145–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, W., Frei, P., Röösli, M., et al. (2010). Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. Environ. Res. 110:658–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz, J., Gryz, K. (2007). Practical aspects of occupational EMF exposure assessment. Environmentalist. 27:525–531. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9067-y (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer, G., Cecil, S., Giczi, W., et al. (2010). The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study. Bioelectromagnetics. 31:535–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röösli, M., Frei, P., Bolte, J., et al. (2010). Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: Proposed study protocol. Environ. Health. 9:14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) (2009). Health Effects of Exposure to EMF, Opinion adopted at the 28th plenary on 19 January 2009, Brussels. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_022.pdf (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) (2015) Opinion on Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields, SCENIHR adopted this opinion at the 9th plenary meeting on 27 January 2015, Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_041.pdf (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Stam, R. (2011). Comparison of International Policies on Electromagnetic Fields (Power Frequency and Radiofrequency Fields). Bilthoven, Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2011 May. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/electromagnetic_fields/docs/emf_comparision_policies_en.pdf (accessed 24 Aug 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Szmigielski, S. (2013). Cancer risks related to low-level RF/MW exposures, including cell phones. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 32:273–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelova, K., Deyanov, C., Israel, M. (2006). Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 209:133–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesselinowa, L. (2013). Biosomatic effects of the electromagnetic fields on view of the physiotherapy personnel health. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 32:192–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar