Comparison of 125-Iododeoxyuridine (¹²⁵IUdR) and [³H]Thymidine ([³H]TdR) for Assessing Cell Proliferation in the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay

References

• Anderson K E, Maibach H I. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an overview. Current problems in dermatology, K E Anderson, H I Maibach. Karger, Basel 1985; 263–290
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, No. 406: Skin sensitization. 1993
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. EPA pesticide assessment guidelines, Subdivision F, hazard evaluation: Human and domestic animals. Series 81–6, EPA. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Japan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fish. MAFF Japan testing guidelines for toxicology studies, dermal sensitization study. MAFF. 1985, 59 NohSan No. 4200
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson B, Kligman A M. The identification of contact allergens by animal assay, the guinea pig maximization test method. J Invest Dermatol 1969; 52: 268–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson B, Kligman A M. Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL 1970; 113–117
   Google Scholar
• Buehler E V. Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol 1965; 91: 171–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler E V. A rationale for the selection of occlusion to induce and elicit contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. Current problems in dermatology, K E Anderson, H I Maibach. Karger, Basle 1985; 39–48
   Google Scholar
• Gad S C, Dunn B J, Dobbs D W, Reilly C, Walsh R D. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 84: 93–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisey J, Miller K. Assessment of the ability of mice fed on vitamin A supplemented diet to respond to a variety of potential contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatil 1986; 15: 17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Hilton J, Botham P A. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparison with the Buehler occluded patch test. J Appl Toxicol 1990; 10: 173–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Basketter D A. The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. FoodChem Toxicol 1992; 30: 165–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Dearman R J, Scholes E W, Basketter D A. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Toxicology 1994; 93: 13–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettinghausen S E, Lipford E H, III, Mule J J, Rosenberg S A. Systemic administration of recombinant interleukin 2 stimulates in vivo lymphoid cell proliferation in tissues. J Immunol 1985; 135: 1488–1497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett M S. Sub‐sampling for attributes. J R Stat Soc Suppl 1937; 4: 131–139
   Google Scholar
• Dunnett C W. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 1955; 50: 1096–1121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal W H, Wallis W A. Use of ranks in one‐criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952; 47: 583–621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn O J. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 1964; 6: 241–252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A J, Clark V A. Jonckheere's test. Non‐parametric statistical methods, V A Clark. New York, Wiley 1975; 120–123
   Google Scholar
• Basketter D A, Scholes E W, Kimber I, et al. Inter‐laboratory evaluation of the local lymph node assay with 25 chemicals and comparison with guinea pig test data. Toxicol Methods 1991; 1: 30–43
   Google Scholar
• Basketter D A, Scholes E W, Kimber I. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. Food Chem Toxicol 1994; 32: 543–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter D A, Scholes E W. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea‐pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food Chem Toxicol 1992; 30: 65–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes E W, Basketter D A, Sarll A E, et al. The local lymph node assay: results of a final inter‐laboratory validation under field conditions. J Appl Toxicol 1992; 12: 217–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne P S, Hillebrand J A, Lewis G R, Karol M H. Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross‐reactivities. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1987; 87: 155–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Hilton J, Botham P A, et al. The murine local lymph node assay, results of an inter‐laboratory trial. Toxicol Lett 1991; 55: 203–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Hilton J, Dearman R J, et al. An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. Toxicology 1995, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligman A M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. J. Invest Dermatol 1966; 47: 393–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelius J, Wahlkvist H, Boman A, Fernstrom P, Grabergs L, Wahlberg J E. Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants. Acta Derm. Venereol 1994; 74: 22–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless S E, Ladies G S, Gerberick G F, et al. Further evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology 1996, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylings J R, Clowes H M, Cumberbatch M, Dearman R J, Kimber I. Influence of vehicle on murine lymph node activation following skin sensitization. The Toxicologist 1995; 15: 7
   Google Scholar
• Kligman A M, Epstein W L. Some factors affecting contact sensitization in man. Mechanisms of hypersensitivity, G A Shaffer, M W Logrippo, M W Chase. Little Brown, Boston 1959; 713–722
   Google Scholar
• Rodenberger S L, Ledger P W, Prevo M E. Murine model for contact sensitization. Toxicol Methods 1993; 3: 157–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enk A H, Katz S I. Early molecular events in the induction phase of contact sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 1992; 89: 1398–1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunziker T, Brand C U, Kapp A, Waelti E R, Braathen L R. Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in human skin lymph derived from sodium lauryl sulphate‐induced contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1992; 127: 254–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearman R J, Hope J C, Hopkins S J, Debicki R J, Kimber I. Interleukin 6 (IL‐6) production by lymph node cells: an alternative endpoint for the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicol Methods 1993; 3: 268–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar