Inhalation Exposure Systems

References

• Andre S, Charuau J, Rateau G, Vavasseur C, Metivier H. Design of a new inhalation device for rodents and primates. J. Aerosol Sci 1989; 20: 674–656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M E, Gargas M L, Jones R A, Jenkins L J. The use of inhalation techniques to assess the kinetic constants of 1,1‐dichloroethylene metabolism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 47: 395–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M E, Gargas M L, Jones R A, Jenkins L J. Determination of the kinetic constants for metabolism of inhaled toxicants in vivo using gas uptake measurements. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980; 54: 100–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair W J, Porter N S, Brown D P, Wehner A P. Apparatus for direct inhalation of cigarette smoke by dogs. J Appl Physiol 1969; 26: 847–850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr E B, Cheng Y S, Mauderly J L. Determination of oxygen depletion in a nose‐only exposure chamber. NTIS, Springfield, VA 1987; 72–75, Annual Report of the Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute, LMF‐120
   Google Scholar
• Barrow C S, Steinhagen W H. Design, construction and operation of a simple inhalation exposure system. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1982; 2: 33–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Coggins C RE. Description of a continuous‐smoking inhalation machine for exposing small animals to tobacco smoke. Beitr Tabakforschung International 1980; 10: 169–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein D M, Drew R T. The major parameters affecting temperature inside inhalation chambers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1980; 41: 420–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard J D, Willeke K. An inhalation system for characterizing total lung deposition of ultrafine particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44: 846–856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boecker B B, Aguilar F L, Mercer T T. A canine inhalation exposure apparatus utilizing a whole‐body plethysmograph. Health Phys 1964; 10: 1077–1089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolt H M, Kappus H, Buchter A, Bolt W. Disposition of ‘1,2‐C’ vinyl chloride in the rats. Arch Toxicol 1976; 35: 153–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond J A, Benson J M, Sun J D, Hylarides M D. Use of radiolabeling in environmental and toxicological research. Hazard Assessment of Chemicals, J Saxena. Hemisphere, Washington, DC 1986; 29–60
   Google Scholar
• Broderson J R, Lindsey J R, Crawford J E. The role of environmental ammonia in respiratory mycoplasmosis of rats. Am J Pathol 1976; 85: 115–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell K I, Crider W L, Knott J M, Malanchuk M. Alien constituents in experimental atmospheres. Proceedings of 5th Annual Conference on Atmosphere Contamination in Confined Spaces. 1969; 297–306
   Google Scholar
• Cannon W C, Blanton E F, McDonald K E. The flow‐past chamber: An improved nose‐only exposure system for rodents. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44: 923–928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter R L, Beethe R L. Cones, cone angles, plenums and manifolds. Proceedings of Workshop on Inhalation Chamber Technology, R T Drew. NTIS, Springfield, VA 1978; 21–30, BNL 51318
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter R L, Beethe R L. Airflow and aerosol distribution in animal exposure facilities. Generation of Aerosols, K Willeke. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1980; 459–473
   Google Scholar
• Chang J CF, Gross E A, Swenberg J A, Barrow C S. Nasal cavity deposition, histopathology, and cell proliferation after single or repeated formaldehyde exposure in B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983; 68: 161–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B T, Bechtold W E, Mauderly J L. Description and evaluation of a cigarette smoke generation system for inhalation studies. J Aerosol Med 1992; 5: 19–30
   Google Scholar
• Chen B T, Yeh H C, Cheng Y S. Evaluation of an environmental reaction chamber. Aerosol Sci Technol 1992; 17: 9–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B T, Benz J V, Finch F L, Mauderly J L, Sabourin P J, Yeh H C, Snipes M B. Effect of exposure mode on amounts of radiolabeled cigarette particles in lungs and gastrointestinal tracts of F344 rats. Inhal Toxicol
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y S, Yen H C, Mauderly J L, Molker B V. Characterization of diesel exhaust in a chronic inhalation study. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1984; 45: 547–555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y S, Barr E B, Benson J M, Damon E G, Medinsky M A, Hobbs C H, Goehl T J. Evaluation of a real‐time aerosol monitor (RAM‐S) for inhalation studies. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1988; 10: 321–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng Y S, Barr E B, Carpenter R L, Benson J M, Hobbs C H. Improvement of aerosol distribution in whole‐body inhalation exposure chambers. Inhal Toxicol. 1989; 1: 153–166
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Y S, Su Y F, Chen B T. Plate‐out rates of radon progeny and particles in a spherical chamber. Indoor Radon and Lung Cancer. Reality or Myth?, F T Cross. Battelle Press, Richland, WA 1992; 709–729
   Google Scholar
• Chow H Y, Mercer T T. Charges on droplets produced by atomization of solutions. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1971; 32: 247–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough G. Environmental effects on animals used in biomedical research. Biol Rev 1982; 57: 487–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comstock E G, Rue R R, Gast J H. A system for exposure of mice to an atmosphere containing carbon particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1962; 23: 88–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cropp G JA, Bernstein I L, Boushey H A, Hyde R W, Rosenthal R R, Spector S L, Townley R G. Guidelines for bronchial inhalation challenges with pharmacologic and antigenic agents. American Thoracic Society News. Spring, 1980; 11–19
   Google Scholar
• Dahl A R, Gugliotta T P, Hanson R L, Mauderly J L, Rothenberg S J. A method for the continuous measurement of respiration and vapor uptake in rats. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987; 48: 505–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl A R, Bechtold W E, Bond J A, Henderson R F, Mauderly J L, Muggenburg B A, Sun J D, Birnbaum L S. Species differences in the metabolism and disposition of inhaled 1.3‐butadiene and isoprene. Environ Health Perspect 1990; 86: 65–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker J R, Moss O R, Goehl T J (1985) Method of Determining Uniform Distribution Test Compound in Inhalation Bioassay Exposure Chambers. Presented in 1985 American Association for Aerosol Research Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, Nov. 18–22, 1985
   Google Scholar
• Drew R T, Laskin S. Environmental inhalation chambers. Methods of Animal Experimentation, W I Gay. Academic Press, New York 1973; 1–41
   Google Scholar
• EPA. Health Effects Test Guidelines. 1982, EPA 560/6–82‐001. PB82–232984
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild G A. Measurement of respiratory volume for virus retention studies in mice. Appl Microbiol 1972; 24: 812–818
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferin J, Leach L J. Horizontal airflow inhalation exposure chamber. Generation of Aerosols, K Willcke. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1980; 517–523
   Google Scholar
• Filser J G, Bolt H M. Pharmacokinetics of halogenated ethylenes in rats. Arch Toxicol 1979; 42: 123–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filser J G, Bolt H M. Inhalation pharmacokinetics based on gas uptake studies. Arch Toxicol 1981; 47: 279–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach R F, Medinsky M A, Hobbs C H, Bice D E, Bechtold W E, Cheng Y S, Gillett N A, Birnbaum L S, Mauderly J L. Effect of four‐week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamideon specific and non‐specific airwav sensitivity of the guinea pig. J Appl Toxicol 1989; 9: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffis L C, Wolff R K, Beethe R L, Hobbs C H, McClcllan R O. Evaluation of a multi‐tiered inhalation exposure chamber. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1981; 1: 8–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffith R B, Standafer S. Simultaneous mainstream‐sidestream smoke exposure systems. II. The rats exposure system. Toxicology 1985; 35: 13–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner R E, Watanabe P G, Gehring P J. Preliminary studies on the fates of inhaled vinyl chloride monomer in rats. Ann NY Acad Sci 1975; 246: 135–148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich U, Pott F, Mohr U, Stöber W. Experimental methods for the detection of the carcinogenicity and/or cocarcinogenicity of inhaled polycyclic‐aromatic‐hydrocarbon‐containing emissions. Carcinogenesis. Raven Press, New York 1985; Vol. 8: 131–146
   Google Scholar
• Hemenway D R, Carpenter R L, Moss O R. Inhalation toxicology chamber performance: A quantitative model. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982; 43: 120–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemenway D R, MacAskill S. Design, development and test results of a horizontal flow inhalation toxicology facility. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982; 43: 874–879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemenway D R, Sylvester D, Gale P N, Vacek P, Evans J N. Effectiveness of animal rotation in achieving uniform dust exposures and lung dust deposition in horizontal flow chambers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44: 655–658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemenway D R, Jakab G J, Risby T H, Sehbert S S, Bowes S M, Hmieleski R. Nose‐only Inhalation system using the fluidized‐bed generation system for coexposures to carbon black and formaldehyde. Inhal Toxicol 1990; 2: 69–89
   Google Scholar
• Henderson D W. An apparatus for the study of airborne infection. J Hyg 1952; 50: 53–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson R F, Cheng Y S, Dutcher J S, Marshall T C, White J E. Studies on the Inhalation Toxicity of Dyes Present in Colored Smoke Munitions. Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute. 1984, Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Higuchi M A, Davies D W. An ammonia abatement system for whole‐body small animal inhalation exposures to acid aerosols. Inhal Toxicol 1993; 5: 333–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinners R C, Burkart J K, Punte C L. Animal inhalation exposure chambers. Arch Environ Health 1968; 16: 194–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg R W, Moneyhun J H, Dalbey W E. An exposure system for toxicological studies of concentrated oil aerosols. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology, B KJ Leong. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981; 53–64
   Google Scholar
• Hoover M D, Mewhinney C J. Evaluation of a 96‐port nose‐only exposure chamber. NTIS, Springfield, VA 1985; 41–44, In: Annual Report of the Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute, LMF‐114
   Google Scholar
• Huff J E, Haseman J K, McConnell E E, Moore J A. The National Toxicology Program, toxicology data evaluation techniques and long‐term carcinogenesis studies. Safety Evaluation of Drugs and Chemicals, W E Lloyd. Hemisphere, New York, NY 1986; 411–447
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger R J, Shoner L G, Coffman L. 1,1‐Dichloroethylene hepatotoxicity: Proposed mechanism of action and distribution and binding of 14C radioactivity following inhalation exposure in rats. Environ Health Perspect 1977; 21: 113–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemski J V, Phillips G B. Aerosol challenge of animals. Methods of Animal Experimentation, W I Gay. Academic Press, New York, NY 1965; Vol. 1: 274–341
   Google Scholar
• Kanapilly G M, Tu K T, Larsen T B, Fogel G R, Luna R J. Controlled generation of ultrafine metallic aerosols by vaporization of an organic chelate of the metal. J Colloid Interface Sci 1978; 65: 533–547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry T O, Ramsey J C, McKenna M J. Pulmonary physiology and inhalation dosimetry in rats: Development of a method and two examples. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983; 71: 72–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane W B. Investigating inhalation hazard using synthetic radioactive fallout. Air Pollut Cont Assoc J 1959; 9: 102–104
   Google Scholar
• Langård S, Nordhagen A L. Small animal inhalation chambers and the significance of dust ingestion from the contaminated coat when exposing rats to zinc chromate. Acta Pharmacol 1980; 46: 43–46
   Google Scholar
• Laskin S, Drew R T. An inexpensive portable inhalation chamber. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1970; 31: 645–646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laskin S, Kuschner M, Drew R T. Studies in pulmonary carcinogenesis. Inhalation Carcinogenesis, M G Hanna, et al. NTIS, US AEC, Springfield, VA 1969; 321–352, CONF‐691001
   Google Scholar
• Leach L J, Spiegl C J. An animal inhalation exposure unit for toxicity screening. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1958; 19: 66–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leach L J, Spiegl C J, Wilson R H, Sylvester G E, Lauterbach K E. A multiple chamber exposure unit design for chronic inhalation studies. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1959; 20: 13–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leach C L, Oberg S G, Sharma R P, Drown D B. A nose‐only inhalation exposure system for generation, treatment and characterization of formaldehyde vapor. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1984; 45: 269–273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong B KJ. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981
   Google Scholar
• Leong B KJ, Powell D J, Pochyla G L, Lummis M G. An active dispersion inhalation exposure chamber. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology, B KJ Leong. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981; 65–76
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann M. Aerosol exposure methods. Generation of Aerosols, K Willeke. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1980; 443–458
   Google Scholar
• Lutz W K, Schlatter C H. A closed inhalation chamber for quantitative metabolism studies of volatile compounds with small laboratory animals. Toxicol Lett 1977; 1: 83–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEwen J D, Urban E CJ, Smith R J, Vorwald A J. A new method for massive dust exposures by inhalation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1961; 22: 109–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacEwen J D. Nonconventional systems. Chapter 2. Proceedings of Workshop on Inhalation Chamber Technology, R T Drew. NTIS, Springfield, VA 1978; 9–16, BNL‐51318
   Google Scholar
• MacFarland H N. Design and operational characteristics of inhalation exposure equipment: A review. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1983; 3: 603–613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacFarland H N. Designs and operational characteristics of inhalation exposure equipment. Inhalation Toxicology. Dekker, New York 1987; 93–120
   Google Scholar
• Malanchuk M, Barkley N P, Contnur G L. Interference of animal source ammonia with exposure chamber atmospheres containing acid particulate from automobile exhaust. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 1980; 4: 265–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marra M, Rombout J A. Design and performance of an inhalation chamber for exposing laboratory animals to oxidant air pollutants. Inhal Toxicol 1990; 2: 187–204
   Google Scholar
• Mauderly J L. Influence of sex and age on the pulmonary function of the unanesthetized Beagle dog. J Gerontol 1974; 29: 282–289
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauderly J L, Tesarek J E, Sifford L J, Sifford L J. Respiratory measurements of unsedated small laboratory mammals using nonbreathing valves. Lab Anim Sci 1979; 29: 323–329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauderly J L. Respiration of F344 rats in nose‐only inhalation exposure tubes. J Appl Toxicol 1986; 6: 25–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClellan R O, Boecker B B, Lopez J A. Inhalation toxicology: Consideration in the design and operation of laboratory. Concepts in Toxicology, F Homburger. Kagar AG, BaselSwitzerland 1984; 170–189
   Google Scholar
• Medinsky M A, Dutcher J S, Bond J A, Henderson R F, Mauderly J L, Snipes M B, Mewhinney J A, Cheng Y S, Birnbaum L S. Uptake and excretion of ‘14C’methyl bromide as influenced by exposure concentration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1985; 78: 215–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokler B V, White R K. Quantitative standard for exposure chamber integrity. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1983; 44: 292–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morken D A. A Radon Exposure Unit for Small Animals. University of Rochester. 1955, UR‐307, Atomic Energy Report
   Google Scholar
• Moss O R. Comparison of three methods of evaluating inhalation toxicology chamber performance. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology, B KJ Leong. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981; 19–28
   Google Scholar
• Moss O R, Decker J R, Cannon W C. Aerosol mixing in an animal exposure chamber having three levels of caging with excreta pans. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982; 43: 244–249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss O R. Sampling in exposure chambers. Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants6th Edition, P J Lioy. ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH 1983; J2–J5
   Google Scholar
• Murphy S D, Ulrich C E. Multi‐animal test system for measuring effects of irritant gases and vapors on respiratory function of guinea pigs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1964; 25: 28–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NIH. Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Publication No. 85–23, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 1985
   Google Scholar
• Newton G J, Kanapilly G M, Boecker B B, Raabe O G. Radioactive labeling of aerosols: Generation methods and characteristics. Generation of Aerosols, K Willeke. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1980; 399–426
   Google Scholar
• Newton G J, Cuddihy R G, Yeh H C, Boecker B B. Design and performance of a recirculating radon‐progeny aerosol generation and animal inhalation exposure system. Indoor Radon and Lung Cancer Reality or Myth?, F T Cross. Battelle Press, Richland, WA 1992; 709–729
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisFrance 1981
   Google Scholar
• Okuyama K, Kousaka Y, Yamamoto S, Hosokawa T. Particle loss of aerosols with particle diameters between 6 and 2000 nm in stirred tank. J Colloid Interface Sci 1986; 110: 214–223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan A YS, Jegier Z. A simple exposure chamber for gas inhalation experiments with small animals. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1970; 31: 647–649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paustenbach D J, Carlson G P, Christian J E, Born B S, Rausch J E. A dynamic closed‐loop recirculating inhalation chamber for conducting pharmacokinetic and short‐term toxicity studies. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1983; 3: 528–532
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phalen R F. Inhalation Studies: Foundation and Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1984
   Google Scholar
• Raabe O G, Kanapilly G M, Newton G J. New methods for the generation of aerosols of insoluble particles for use in inhalation studies. Inhaled Particles III, W H Walton. Unwin Brothers, SurreyEngland 1971; 3–18
   Google Scholar
• Raabe O G, Bennick J E, Light M E, Hobbs C H, Thomas R L, Tillery M I. An improved apparatus for acute inhalation exposure of rodents to radioactive aerosols. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1973; 26: 264–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao G N. Significance of environmental factors on the test system. Managing Conduct and Data Quality of Toxicology Studies. Princeton Scientific, Princeton, NJ 1986; 173–185
   Google Scholar
• Riley A. A new approach to the construction of small animal inhalation chambers: Design and evaluation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986; 47: 147–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem H. Inhalation Toxicology: Research methods, applications and evaluation. Dekker, New York, NY 1987
   Google Scholar
• Schreck R M, Chan T L, Soderholm S C. Design, operation and characterization of large volume exposure chambers. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology, B KJ Leong. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981; 29–52
   Google Scholar
• Silver S D. Constant flow gassing chambers: Principles influencing design and operation. J Lab Clin Med 1946; 31: 1153–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D M, Ortiz L W, Archuleta R F, Spalding J F, Tillery M I, Ettinger H J, Thomas R G. A method for chronic nose‐only exposures of laboratory animals to inhaled fibrous aerosols. Inhalation Toxicology and Technology, B KJ Leong. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1981; 89–106
   Google Scholar
• Snipes M B, Spoo J W, Brookins L K, Jones S E, Mauderly J L, Orwat T B, Stiver J H, Dahl A R. A method for measuring nasal and lung uptake of inhaled vapor. Fund Appl Toxicol 1991; 16: 81–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiegl C J, Leach L J, Lauterbach K E, Wilson R, Laskin S. A small chamber for studying test atmospheres. AMA Arch Ind Hyg and Occup Med 1953; 8: 286–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Springer D L, Miller R A, Weimer W C, Ragan H A, Buschbom R L, Mahlum D D. Effects of inhalation exposure to a high‐boiling (288–454°C) coal liquid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 82: 112–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlhofen W, Gebhart J, Heyder J. Experimental determination of the regional deposition of aerosol particles in the human respiratory tract. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1980; 41: 285–298
   Google Scholar
• Sterner R T, Johns B E, Crane K A, Shumake S A, Gaddis S E. An expensive humidifying and cooling system for inhalation chambers. Inhal Toxicol 1991; 3: 139–144
   Google Scholar
• Strong J C, Walsh M. A facility for studying the carcinogenic and synergistic effects of radon daughters and other agents in rodents. Indoor Radon and Lung Cancer: Reality or Myth?, F T Cross. Battelle Press, Richland, WA 1992; 731–740
   Google Scholar
• Stuart B O, Willard D H, Howard E B. Uranium mine air contaminations in dogs and hamsters. Inhalation Carcinogenesis, M G Hanna, et al. NTIS, US AEC, Springfield, VA 1969; 413–427, CONF‐691001
   Google Scholar
• Thomas A A. Low ambient pressure environments and toxicity. Arch Environ Health 1965; 11: 316–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R G, Lie R. Procedures and Equipment Used in Inhalation Studies on Small Animals. Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, NM 1963, LF‐11
   Google Scholar
• Vocci F J, Krackow E H, Swann H E, Eipper J E, Ballard T A. An apparatus for quantitative studies of inhaled aerosol by dosimetric procedure. Air Pollut Cont Assoc J 1956; 6: 69–71
   Google Scholar
• Walsh M, Pritchard J N, Black A, Moores S R, Morgan A. The development of a system for the exposure of mice to aerosols of plutonium oxide. J Aerosol Sci 1980; 11: 467–474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weihe W H. The significance of physical environment for the health and state of adaptation of laboratory animals. Defining the Laboratory Animal. Inst Lab Animal Resource. Natl Acad Sci, Washington 1971; 353–378
   Google Scholar
• Weissman S H, Beethe R L, Redman H C. Ammonia concentrations in an animal inhalation exposure chamber. Lab Animal Sci 1980; 30: 974–980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willeke K. Generation of aerosols and facilities for exposure experiments. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI 1980
   Google Scholar
• Wolff R K, Griffis L C, Hobbs C H, McClellan R O. Disposition and retention of 0.1 μm 67Ga2O3 aggregate aerosols in rats following whole body exposures. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1982; 2: 195–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeh H C, Newton G J, Barr E B, Carpenter R L, Hobbs C H. Studies of the temporal and spatial distribution of aerosols in multi‐tiered inhalation exposure chambers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986; 47: 540–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh H C, Carpenter R L, Cheng Y S. Electrostatic charge of aerosol particles from a fluidized bed aerosol generator. J Aerosol Sci 1988; 19: 147–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh H C, Snipes M B, Eidson A F, Hobbs C H, Henry M C. Comparative evaluation of nose‐only versus whole‐body inhalation exposure for rats‐aerosol characterization and lung deposition. Inhal Toxicol 1990; 2: 205–221
   Google Scholar