Predictive Toxicology Methods for Transdermal Delivery Systems

References

• Andersen K. E. Predictive animal sensitization assays. Acta Pharm Nord 1992; 4: 127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen K. E, Maibach H I. Guinea pig sensitization assays. An overview. Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs Current problems in dermatology, K E Andersen, H I Maibach. Karger, Basel 1985; 14: 263
   Google Scholar
• Babich H, Borenfreund E. Cytotoxic effects of food additives and pharmaceuticals on cells in culture as determined with the neutral red assay. J Pharm Sci 1990; 79: 593–594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour B M, McFarlin D E, Sumerska T, Parker D. Experimental studies in contact sensitivity. Monog Allergy 1974; 8: 27–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartek M J, La Budde J A, Maibach H I. Skin permeability in vivo: Comparison in rat, rabbit, pig, and man. J Invest Dermatol 1972; 58: 114–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickers D R, Kappas A. The skin as a site of chemical metabolism. Extrahepatic metabolism of drugs and foreign compounds, T E Gram. Luce, Bridgeport, CT 1980; 295–318
   Google Scholar
• Bogen K T, Colston B W, Machicao L K. Dermal absorption of dilute aqueous chloroform, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene in hairless guinea pigs. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1992; 18: 30–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borenfreund E, Babich H. In vitro cytotoxicity of heavy metals, acrylamide, and organotin salts to neutral cells and fibroblasts. Cell Biol Toxicol 1987; 3: 63–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenfreund E, Puerner J A. Short-term quantitative in vitro cytotoxicity assay involving an S-9 activating system. Cancer Lett 1987; 34: 243–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenfreund E, Babich H, Martin-Alguacil N. Comparisons of two in vitro cytotoxicity assays—The neutral red (NR) and tetrazolium MTT tests. Toxicol In Vitro 1988; 2: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braue E H, Mershon M M, Wade J V, Litchfield M R. In vivo assessment of vesicant skin injury using a Minolta chroma meter. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1990; 41: 259–265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucks D AW. Skin structure and metabolism relevance to the design of cutaneous therapeutics. Pharm Res 1984; 1: 148–153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buehler E V. Occlusive patch method for skin sensitization in guinea pigs: The Buehler method. Food Chem Toxicol 1994; 32: 97–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulychev A, Trouet A, Tulkens P. Uptake and intracellular distribution of neutral red in cultured fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 1978; 115: 343–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester A E, Terrell T G, Nave E, Dorr A E, De Pass L R. Dermal sensitization study in hairless guinea pigs with dinitrochlorobenzene and ethyl aminobenzoate. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol 1988; 7: 273–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transdermal controlled release systems. Medical applications of controlled release, G W Cleary, R S Langer, D L Wise. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1984; 1: 203–251
   Google Scholar
• Cormier M, Ledger P, Marty J P, Amkraut A. In vitro cutaneous biotransformation of propranolol. J Invest Dermatol 1991; 97: 447–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacoff J B, House R V, Dean J H. Comparison of a radioisotopic incorporation method and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) for contact sensitivity to weak sensitizers. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1988; 10: 40–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramb G. Selective lysosomal uptake and accumulation of the beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol in cultured and isolated cell systems. Biochem Pharmacol 1986; 35: 1365–1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leo V A. Cutaneous irritancy. In vitro toxicity testing: Applications to safety evaluation, J M Frazier. Marcel Dekker, New York 1992; 191–203
   Google Scholar
• Dickson F M, Lawrence J N, Benford D J. Release of inflammatory mediators in human keratinocyte cultures following exposure to a skin irritant. Toxicol In Vitro 1993; 7: 385–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson F M, Lawrence J N, Benford D J. Cytotoxicity of 12 chemicals of known human and animal skin irritation potential in human keratinocyte cultures. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 661–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draize T H. Dermal toxicity. Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States. Appraisal of the safety of foods, drugs and cosmetics. Texas State Department of Health, Austin 1959; 46–59
   Google Scholar
• Draize T H, Woodland G, Calvery H O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucus membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82: 377–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy P A, Flint O P, Orton T C, Fursey M J. Initial validation of an in vitro test for predicting skin irritancy. Food Chem Toxicol 1986; 22: 517–518
   Google Scholar
• Eagle H. Amino acid metabolism in mammalian cell cultures. Science 1959; 130: 432–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun H C, Chung J H, Jung S Y, Cho K H, Kim K H. A comparative study of the cytotoxicity of skin irritants on cultured human oral and skin keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 1994; 130: 24–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong T A, Mosmann T R. The role of IFN-gamma in delayed-type hypersensitivity medicated by Th1 clones. J Immunol 1989; 143: 2887–2893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gad S C, Dunn B J, Dobbs D N, Reilly C, Walsh R D. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: The mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 84: 93–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay R, Swiderek M, Nelson D, Ernesti A. The living skin equivalent as a model in vitro for ranking the toxic potential of dermal irritants. Toxicol In Vitro 1992; 6: 303–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green L M, Reade J L, Ware C F. Rapid colorimetric assay for cell viability: Application to the quantitation of cytoxic and growth inhibitory lymphokines. J Immunol Methods 1984; 70: 257–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess W L, Rosenkluth S A, Schmidt B, Autain J. Agar diffusion method for toxicity screening of plastics on cultural cell monolayers. J Pharm Sci 1965; 54: 1545–1547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy R H, Hadgraft J. Percutaneous absorption with saturable metabolism. Int J Pharm 1982; 11: 187–197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadgraft J. Theoretical aspects of metabolism in the epidermis. Int J Pharm 1980; 2: 177–194
   Google Scholar
• Hockley K, Baxter D. Use of the T-cell neutral red uptake assay for irritants as an alternative to the rabbit (Draize) test. Food Chem Toxicol 1986; 24: 473–475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husøy T, Syversen T, Jenssen J. Comparisons of four in vitro cytotoxicity tests: The MTT assay. NR assay, uridine incorporation and protein measurements. Toxicol In Vitro 1993; 7: 149–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikarashi Y, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens. Arch Toxicol 1993; 67: 629–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Toxicokinetics: The Assessment of Systemic Exposure in Toxicity Studies. Step 2 of the 1CH process, Orlando, FL, 27–29 October, 1993. The parties to the ICH are the European Community, Japan, and the United States
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz J, Yacobi A. Toxicokinetics. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1994; 10: 383–403
   Google Scholar
• Kao J, Hall J. Skin absorption and cutaneous first pass metabolism of topical steroids: In vitro studies with mouse skin in organ culture. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987; 241: 482–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao T, Hall T, Holland T M. Quantitation of cutaneous toxicity: An in vitro approach using skin organ culture. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983; 68: 206–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao J, Hall J, Shugart L R, Holland J M. An in vitro approach to studying cutaneous metabolism and disposition of topically applied xenobiotics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1984; 75: 289–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao J, Patterson F K, Hall J. Skin penetration and metabolism of topically applied chemicals in six mammalian species, including man: An in vitro study with benzo[a]pyrene and testosterone. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1985; 81: 502–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz D R, Mukherjee S, Maisey J, Miller K. Vitamin A acetate as a regulator of accessory cell function in delayed-type hypersensitivity responses. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1987; 82: 53–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimber I. Cytokines and regulation of allergic sensitization to chemicals. Toxicology 1994; 93: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Weisenberger C. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study. Arch Toxicol 1989a; 63: 274–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Weisenberger C. A modified murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens. Current topics in contact dermatitis, P J Frosch, A Dooms-Goossens, J M Lachapelle, R JG Rycroft, R J Scheper. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 1989b; 592
   Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Mitchell J A, Griffin A C. Development of a murine local lymph node assay for the determination of sensitizing potential. Food Chem Toxicol 1986; 24: 585–586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Hilton J, Weisenberger C. The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: A preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21: 215–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Hilton J, Botham P A. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: Comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs. J Appl Toxicol 1990; 10: 173–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Dearman R J, Scholes E W, Basketter D A. The local lymph node assay: Developments and applications. Toxicology 1994; 93: 13–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klecak G. Identification of contact allergens: Predictive tests in animals. Dermatotoxicology 2nd ed., F N Marzulli, H I Maibach. Hemisphere, New York 1983; 93–236
   Google Scholar
• Klecak G. The Freund's complete adjuvant test and the open epicutaneous test. A complementary test procedure for realistic assessment of allergenic potential. Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. Current problems in dermatology, K E Andersen, H I Maibach. Karger, Basel 1985; 14: 152–171
   Google Scholar
• Koschier F J, Roth R N, Stephens T J, Spence E T, Duke M A. In vitro skin irritation testing of petroleum-based compounds in reconstituted human skin models. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol 1994; 13: 23–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch D H, Roberts L K, Daynes R A. Skin immunology. The Achilles heel to transdermal drug delivery. J Controlled Release 1987; 6: 39–50
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan F SK, Rafft R R, Elvers W B. A comparison of the skin irritation produced by cosmetic ingredients and formulations in the rabbit, guinea pig, and beagle dog to that observed in the human. Animal models in dermatology, H I Maibach. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1975; 12–22
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson B, Kligman A M. The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J Invest Dermatol 1969; 52: 268–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire H C, Jr, Cipriano D. Split adjuvant technique. Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. Current problems in dermatology, K E Andersen, H I Maibach. Karger, Basel 1985; 14: 107–113
   Google Scholar
• Maibach H. Clonidine: Irritant and allergic contact dermatitis assays. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 12: 192–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisey J., Miller K. Assessment of the ability of mice fed on vitamin A supplemented diet to respond to a variety of potential contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15: 17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinovich M, Tragni E, Corsini A, Galli C L. Quantification of in vitro cytotoxicity of surfactants: Correlation with their eye irritation potential. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol 1990; 9: 169–178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A, Clynes M. Acid phosphatase: Endpoint for in vitro toxicity tests. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1991; 27A: 183–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin R J, Denyer S P, Hadgraft J. Skin metabolism of topically applied compounds. Int J Pharm 1987; 39: 23–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer T. Contact and photocontact allergens. A manual of predictive lest methods. Marcel Dekker, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Maurer T, Kimber I. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: Comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology 1991; 69: 209–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer T, Weirich E G, Hess R. Predictive animal testing for photocontact allergenicity. Br J Dermatol 1980; 103: 593–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer T, Arthur A, Bentley P. Guinea-pig contact sensitization assays. Toxicology 1994; 93: 47–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreesh A H, Steinberg M. Skin irritation testing in animals. Dermatotoxicology, F N Marzulli, H I Maibach. Hemisphere, New York 1983; 147–166
   Google Scholar
• McFarlin D E, Balfour B. Contact sensitivity in the pig. Immunology 1973; 25: 995–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekori Y A, Dvorak H F, Galli S J. 125I-fibrin deposition in contact sensitivity reactions in the mouse: Sensitivity of the assay for quantitating reactions after active or passive sensitization. J Immunol 1986; 136: 2018–2024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller K, Maisey J, Malkovsky M. Enhancement of contact sensitization in mice fed a diet enriched in vitamin A acetate. Int Arch Allergy AppI Immunol 1984; 75: 120–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyauchi H, Horio T. A new animal model for contact dermatitis: The hairless guinea pig. J Dermatol 1992; 19: 140–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montelius J, Wahlkvist H, Boman A, Fernstrdm P, Grabergs L, Wahlberg J E. Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: Inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1994; 74: 22–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983; 65: 55–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangia A, Bloom E, Berner B, Maibach H. Human keratinocyte cell culture for studying skin irritation in man. Int J Pharm 1993; 99: 67–72
   Google Scholar
• Ng K M, Chu I, Bronaugh R L, Franklin C A, Somers D A. Percutaneous absorption and metabolism of pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene, and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo results in the hairless guinea pig. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1992; 115: 216–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen A L, Gores G J, Bond J M, Imberti R, Herman B, Lemasters J J. A novel cytotoxicity screening assay using am ulti well fluorescence scanner. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1992; 115: 147–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan P K, Wester R C. Cutaneous metabolism of xenobiotics. Percutaneous absorption, R L Bronaugh, H I Maibach. Marcel Dekker, New York 1985; 65–85
   Google Scholar
• Osborne R, Perkins M A. In vitro skin irritation testing with human skin cell cultures. Toxicol In Vitro 1991; 5: 563–567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parish W E. Evaluation of in vitro predictive tests for irritation and allergic sensitization. Food Chem Toxicol 1986; 24: 481–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick E, Maibach H. Dermatotoxicology. Principles and methods of toxicology 3d ed., A W Hayes. Raven Press, New York 1994; 767–803
   Google Scholar
• Phillips L, Steinberg M, Maibach H I, Akers W A. A comparison of rabbit and human skin responses to certain irritants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1972; 21: 369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponec M, Haverkort M, Soei Y L, Kempenaar J, Bodde H. Use of human keratinocyte and fibroblast cultures for toxicity studies of topically applied compounds. J Pharm Sci 1990; 79: 312–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman B C. Alkali metal chelators—The ionophores. Inorganic biochemistry, L Eichhorn. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1973; 1: 203–226
   Google Scholar
• Reifenrath W G, Hawkins G S. The weaning Yorkshire pig as an animal model for measuring percutaneous penetration. Swine in biomedical research, M E Tumbleson. Plenum, New York 1986; 1: 673–680
   Google Scholar
• Reijngoud D J, Tager J M. Chloroquine accumulation in isolated rat liver lysosomes. FEBS Lett 1976; 64: 231–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson M K, Nusair T L, Fletcher E R, Ritz H L. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization. Toxicology 1990; 61: 91–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenberger S L, Ledger P W, Prevo M E. Murine model for contact sensitization. Toxicol Methods 1993; 3: 157–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehm N W, Rodgers G H, Hatfield S M, Glasebrook A L. An improved colorimetric assay for cell proliferation and viability utilizing the tetrazolium salt XTT. J Immunol Methods 1991; 142: 257–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roguet R, Cohen C, Dossou K G, Rougier A. Episkin, a reconstituted human epidermis for assessing in vitro the irritancy of topically applied compounds. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 283–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudabush R A, Terhaar C T, Fassett D W, Dziuba S P. Comparative acute effects of some chemicals on the skin of rabbits and guinea pigs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1965; 7: 559–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y. Modified guinea pig maximization test. Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs. Current problems in dermatology, K E Andersen, H I Maibach. Karger, Basel 1985; 14: 193–200
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann H., Lovell W W., Holzle E, Johnson B E, Maurer T., Miranda M A, Pape W JW, Sapora O, Sladowski D. In vitro phototoxicity testing: The report and recommendations of European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods Workshop 2. Ahem Lab Anim 1994; 22: 314–348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg M, Akers W A, Weeks M H, McCreesh A H, Maibach H I. A comparison of test techniques based on rabbit and human skin responses to irritants with recommendation regarding the evaluation of mildly or moderately irritating compounds. Animal models in dermatology, H I Maibach. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1975; 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Stevens C S, DeVillez R L. Enzymology, with applications to dermatology. Int J Dermatol 1980; 19: 295–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swisher D A, Prevo M E, Ledger P W. The MTT in vitro cytotoxicity test: Correlation with cutaneous irritancy in two animal models. Progress in in vitro toxicology. Alternative Methods in Toxicology Series, A M Goldberg. Mary Ann Liebert, New York 1988; 6: 265–269
   Google Scholar
• Swisher D A, Cormier M, Johnson J, Ledger P W. A cytotoxicity assay using normal, human keratinocytes: Characterization and applications. Models in dermatology, H I Maibach, N J Lowe. Karger, Basel 1989; 4: 131–137
   Google Scholar
• Täber U. Drug metabolism in the skin: Advantages and disadvantages. Transdermal drug delivery: Developmental issues and research initiatives, J Hadgraft, R H Guy. Marcel Dekker, New York 1989; 99–111
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya S, Kondo M, Okamoto K, Takase Y. Studies on contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1982; 8: 246–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. United States Pharmacopeia (USP 23). National Formulary (NF 18). U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD 1995; 1697–1699
   Google Scholar
• Ward R K, Agrawalla S, Clothier R H. Investigation of an in vitro cytotoxicity assay for prediction of skin irritation. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 659–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring M J, Monger L, Hollingsbee D A, Martin G P, Marriott C. Assessment of corticosteroid-induced skin blanching: Evaluation of the Minolta chromameter CR200. Int J Pharm 1993; 94: 211–222
   Google Scholar
• Wester R C, Noonan P K. Relevance of animal models for percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharmacol 1980; 7: 99–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm K P, Surber C, Maibach H I. Quantification of sodium lauryl sulfate irritant dermatitis in man: Comparison of four techniques: Skin color reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 1989; 281: 293–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward D F., Nieves A L, Williams L A, Spada C A, Hawley S B, Duenes J L. A new hairless strain of guinea pig: Characterization of the cutaneous morphology and pharmacology. Models in dermatology, H I Maibach, N J Lowe. Karger, Basel 1989; 4: 71–78
   Google Scholar