References
- William Shakespeare: HENRY VI, Part II, act 4, sc. 2, line 68.
- . The Legal Profession and the Public Image of LawyersRotunda, Ronald D. 23 J. Legal Prof. 51; 1999.
- Dodson S. Global Civil Procedure Trends in the Twenty-First Century; Faculty Publications; 2011. Paper 1139. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1139. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- EU Law: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533176.001.0001/acprof-9780199533176. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- Caylor MLP. Modernizing the Hague evidence convention: a proposed solution to crossborder discovery conflict during civil and commercial litigation. Boston Univ Int Law J 2011; 28:345–392.
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- WestLaw: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/legal/legal_products/a-z/westlaw/. Accessed 21 May 2012.
- LexisNexus: http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page. Accessed 21 May 2012.
- FindLaw: http://www.findlaw.com/. Accessed May 21 2012.
- Federal Rules of Evidence. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/ Accessed 12 April 2012.
- Daubert v.Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals; 13 S. Ct. 2786; 1993.
- Frye v. US; 293 F.1013 (DC Cir.1923).
- Méndez MA. The California Law Revision Commission. Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Part II. Expert Testimony and the Opinion Rule; 2002.
- Toxic tort in FindLaw. http://public.findlaw.com/library/pa-toxic-torts.html. Accessed 21 May 2012.
- Restatement (Second) of Torts § 281. Statement of the Elements of a Cause of Action for Negligence.
- Austin v. Kerr-McGee Refining Corp.; 25 S.W.3d 280 (Tex. App. Texarkana 2000).
- Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence: Third Edition, Committee on the Development of the Third Edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence; Federal Judicial Center; National Research Council; 2011. ISBN 978-0-309-21421-6.
- Federal Rules of Evidence. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/. Accessed 12 April 2012.
- LM Larsen, Masek A, Schafer JA . 65 Cal. Jur. 3d, Work Injury Compensation Summary.
- . Snyder ex relSnyder v. Secretary of Dept. of Health and Human Services; (Fed. Cl., Feb. 12, 2009, 01–162V) 2009 WL 332044.
- Romero v. Hanisch; (D.S.D., Dec. 3, 2010, CIV. 08–5040-JLV) 2010 WL 5020657.
- Geffcken v. D'Andrea; 137 Cal.App.4th 1298, 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 80, (Cal. App. 2 Dist., 2006.)
- FRCP Rule 35. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_35. Accessed 21 May 2012.
- Schlagenhauf v. Holder; 379 U.S. 104, 85 S. Ct. 234, 13 L. Ed. 2d 152; 1964.
- Ky P , Haroon Hameed H , Christo PJ. Independent medical examinations: facts and fallacies.Pain Physician 2009; 12: 811–818.
- Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics.Pediatrics 2002; 109:974–979.
- Satiani B. Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement.Vasc Endovascular Surg 2006; 40:223–227.
- Murphy C. Fear not the IME.J Med Tox2012; 8:34–35.
- Chamberlain RT. Role of the clinical toxicologist in court.Clin Chem 1996; 42:1337–1341.