Water-based solutions are the best decontaminating fluids for dermal corrosive exposures: A mini review

References

• Burgher F, Mathieu L, Lati E, Gasser P, Peno-Mazzarino L, Blomet J, et al. Experimental 70% hydrofluoric acid burns: histological observations in an established human skin explants ex vivo model. Cutan and Ocul Toxicol 2011; 30:100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui X, Lamel S, Qiao P, Maibach HI. Isolated human and animal stratum corneum as a partial model for the 15 steps of percutaneous absorption: emphasizing decontamination, part 2. J Appl Toxicol 2012; 33:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui X, Lamel S, Qiao P, Maibach HI. Isolated human/animal stratum corneum as a partial model for 15 steps in percutaneous absorption: emphasizing decontamination, Part 1. J Appl Toxicol 2013; 33:157–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzelian PS, Victoroff MS, Halmes NC, James RC, Guzelian CP. Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation. Hum Exp Toxicol 2005; 24:161–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller DA, Juberg DR, Catlin N, Farland WH, Hess FG, Wolf DC, Doerrer NG. Identification and characterization of adverse effects in 21st century toxicology. Toxicol Sci 2012; 26:291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Burgher F, Mathieu L, Lati E, Gasser P, Peno-Mazzarino L, Blomet J, et al. Part 2. Comparison of emergency washing solutions in 70% hydrofluoric acid-burned human skin in an established ex vivo explants model. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2011; 30:108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SM, Arnold LL. Chemical carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci 2011; 120:S76–S92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, Bracken MB, Roberts I. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?Br Med J 2004; 328:514–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken MB. Why are so many epidemiology associations inflated or wrong? Does poorly conducted animal research suggest implausible hypotheses?Ann Epidemiol 2009; 19:220–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perel P, Roberts R, Sena E, Wheble P, Briscoe C, Sandercock , et al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: a systematic review. Br Med J 2007; 334:197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett PM, Baker BL, Kang CS, Johnson MS. Evaluation of time required for water-only decontamination of an oil-based agent. Military Med 2010;175:185–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viala B, Blomet J, Mathieu L, Hall AH. Prevention of CS “tear gas” eye and skin effects and active decontamination with diphoterine: preliminary studies in 5 French gendarmes. J Emerg Med 2005; 29:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torngren S, Persson SA, Ljungquist A, Berglung T, Nordstrand M, Hagglund L, et al. Personal decontamination after exposure to simulated liquid phase contaminants: functional assessment of a new unit. J Toxicol ClinToxicol 1998; 36:567–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrick MV, Simpson JD, Liddell S. Skin decontamination – a comparison of four methods. Br J Rad 1982; 55:317–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg BE, Song IC, Walder RH. Hydrotherapy of chemical burns. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1965; 35:85–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sykes RA, Mani MM, Hiebert JM. Chemical burns: retrospective review. J Burn Care Rehab 1986; 7:343–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard LG, Scheulen JJ, Munster AM. Chemical burns: effect of prompt first aid. J Trauma 1982; 22:420–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran KD, O’Reilly T, Munster AM. Chemical burns. A ten-year experience. Am Surg 1987; 53:652–653.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue AM. Diphoterine for alkali chemical splashes to the skin at alumina refineries. Int J Derm 2010; 49:894–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblin I, Urban M, Flicoteau D, Martin C, Pradeau D. Topical treatment of experimental hydrofluoric acid skin burns by 2.5% calcium gluconate. J Burn Care Res 2006; 27:889–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken WM, Cuppage F, McLaury RL, Kirwin C, Klassen CD. Comparative effectiveness of topical treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Occup Med 1985; 27:733–739.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burkhart KK, Brent J, Kirk MA, Baker DC, Kulig KW. Comparison of topical magnesium and calcium treatment for dermal hydrofluoric acid burns. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda H, Honda S, Yamamoto O, Asahi M. Therapeutic effect of topical calcium gluconate for hydrofluoric acid burn – time limit for the start of the treatment. J UOEH 1999; 21:209–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seyb ST, Noordhoek L, Botens S, Mani MM. A study to determine the efficacy of treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16:253–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn BJ, MacKinnon MA, Knowlden NF, Billmaier DJ, Derelanko MJ, Rusch GM, et al. Hydrofluoric acid dermal burns. An assessment of treatment efficacy using an experimental pig mode. J Occup Med 1992; 34:902–909.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu L, Burgher F, Blomet J. Comparative evaluation of the active eye and skin chemical splash solutions Diphoterine and hexafluorine with water and other rinsing solutions: effects on burn severity and healing. J Chem Health Saf 2007; 14:32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallini M, Casati A. A prospective, randomized, blind comparison between saline, calcium gluconate and diphoterine for washing skin acid injuries in rats: effects on substance P and β-endorphin release. Eur J Anaesth 2004; 21:389–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojer J, Personne M, Hulten P, Ludwigs U. Topical treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns: a blind controlled experimental study. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:861–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulten P, Hojer J, Ludwigs U, Janson A. Hexafluorine vs. standard decontamination to reduce systemic toxicity after dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42: 355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rensburg LCJ. An experimental study of chemical burns. S African Med J 1962; 36:754–759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar