Need of speech-in-noise testing to assess listening difficulties in older adults

References

• Saunders GH, Haggard MP. The clinical assessment of ‘Obscure Auditory Dysfunction’ (OAD) - 2. Case control analysis of determining factors. Ear Hear. 1992;13:241–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hind SE, Haines-Bazrafshan R, Benton CL, Brassington W, Towle B, Moore DR. Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:708–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Hearing and Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;83:859–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. Impact of central auditory processing disorder and cognitive deficit on the self-assessment of hearing handicap in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol. 1990;1:75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R, Tillman TW.Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91:273–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH, Mc Ardle RA, Smith SL. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, Quick SIN, and WIN Materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:844–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridakou C, Luxon LM, Bamiou DE. Patient reported speech in noise difficulties and hyperacusis symptoms and correlation with test results. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:1609–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology. ‘Clinical practice guidelines – diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder’2010 Retrieved on 26th June 2014 from http://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/central-auditory-processing-disorder
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Auditory processing disorder (APD). Position Statement, 2011. Retrieved on 26th June 2014 from http://www.thebsa.org.uk/images/stories/docs/BSA_APD_PositionPaper_31March11_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek FE, Oxholm VB. Central auditory anatomy and function. In: Luxon LM, Furman JM, Martini A, Stephens D, editors. Textbook of Audiological Medicine. London: Martin Dunitz; 2003. p. 179–93.
   Google Scholar
• Santi PA, Mancini P. Cochlear Anatomy and Central Auditory Pathways. In: Cummings C, editor. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 1998. p. 2803–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shapleske J, Rossell SL, Woodruff PW, David AS. The planum temporale: a systematic, quantitative review of its structural, functional and clinical significance. Brain Res. 1999; 29:26–49.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson RD, Johnsrude IS. Functional Imaging of the Auditory Processing Applied to Speech Sounds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 363: 1023–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luxon LM. The anatomy and pathology of the central auditory pathways. Br J Audiol. 1981;15:31–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morel A, Imig TJ. Thalamic Projections to Fields A, AI, P, and VP in the cat auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1987; 265:119–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munoz-Lopez MM, Mohedano-Moriano A, Insausti R.Anatomical pathways for auditory memory in primates. Front Neuroanat. 2010;8:129.
   Google Scholar
• Bamiou DE, Sisodiya S, Musiek FE, Luxon LM. The role of the interhemispheric pathway in hearing. Brain Res. 2007; 56:170–82.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovlev PI, Lecours AR. Regional Development of the Brain. Oxford: Blackwell; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Springer S, Gazzaniga M. Dichotic testing of partial and complete split brain patients. Neuropsychologia. 1975;13:341–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboitiz F, Lopez J, Montiel J. Long distance communication in the human brain: timing constraints for interhemispheric synchrony and the origin of brain lateralization. Biol Res. 2003;36:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol J, Vendrell P, Junque C, Marti-Vilalta JL. Gardevilla A.When does human brain development end? Evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood. Ann Neurol. 1992; 34:71–4.
   Google Scholar
• Paraschos IA, Wilkinson WE, Coiffey CE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the corpus callosum: predictors of size in normal adults. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993;7: 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Spongr VP, Flood DG, Frisina RD, Salvi RJ. Quantitative measures of hair cell loss in CBA and C57BL/6 mice throughout their lifespans. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101:3546–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in presbyacusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willott J. Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology and Psychophysics. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaitre H, Goldman AL, Sambataro F, Verchinski BA, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, et al. Normal age-related brain morphometric changes: non-uniformity across cortical thickness, surface area and grey matter volume? Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:617–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ, He Y, Rosa-Neto P, Gong G, Evans AC. Age related alterations in the modular organization of structural cortical network by using cortical thickness from MRI. Neuroimage. 2011;56:235–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Grydeland H, Amlien I, Espeseth T, Reinvang I, et al. Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: non-linear subcortical aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2013; 34:2239–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Jaffe J. Hypothesis on cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia. 1975;13:107–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeeves MA, Moes P. Interhemispheric Transfer Time Differences Related to Aging and Gender. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34:627–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspary DM, Ling L, Turner JG, Hughes LF. Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:1781–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost WA. Auditory Perception and Sound Source Determination In: Fundamentals of Hearing. An Introduction. 4th edn. Elsevier Science (USA): Academic Press; 2000. p. 207–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of Neural Science. 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zatorre RJ, Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2001;11:946–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Kraus N. Neural encoding of speech and music: implications for hearing speech in noise. Semin Hear. 2011;32:129–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao E, Suga N. Experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory cortex and the inferior colliculus of bats: role of the corticofugal system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000; 97:8081–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo F, Wang Q, Kashani A, Yan J. Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain. J. Neurosci. 2008; 28:11615–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke M, Green P, Josifoski L, Vizinho A. Robust automatic speech recognition with missing and unreliable acoustic data. Speech Comm. 2001;34:267–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bregman AS. Auditory Science Analysis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255:556–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR. Listening difficulties in children: bottom-up and top-down contributions. J Commun Disord. 2012; 45:411–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood NL, Cowan N. The Cocktail Party Phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic Listening Selective Procedure of Cherry (1953). J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995;124: 243–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby WH, Pollack I.Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1954;26:212–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976;264: 746–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsius A, Navarra J, Campbell R, Soto-Faraco SS. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Curr Biol. 2005;15:839–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes PB, Lindenberger U. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult lifespan: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging. 1997;12:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik FIM. A functional account of age differences in memory. Human memory and cognitive capabilities: mechanisms and performances. Symposium in Memoriam. Hermann Ebbinghaus 1885, Berlin Humboldt University 1985; North-Holland. 1986. p. 409.
   Google Scholar
• Cabeza R, Anderson ND, Locantore JK, McIntosh AR. Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage. 2002;17:1394–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PC, Jin JX, Gunasekera GM, Abel R, Lee ER, Dhar S. Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:693–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PC, Ettlinger M, Sheppard JP, Gunasekera GM, Dhar S. Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults. Ear Hear. 2010;31:471–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlingeri M, Danelli L, Bottini G, Sberna M, Paulesu E. Reassessing the HAROLD model: is the hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults a special case of compensatory-related utilization of neural circuits? Exp Brain Res. 2013;224:393–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse TA, Miles JD. Aging and time-sharing aspects of executive control. Mem Cognit. 2002;30:572–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo PD, Craik FI, Booth L. Executive function across the lifespan. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004;115:167–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speaks C, Jerger J.Method for measurement of speech identification. J Speech Hear Res. 1965;8:185–94.
   Google Scholar
• Banh J, Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK. Age affects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by Adults with Minimal Audiometric Loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23:81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S, Noble, W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43:85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH. Development of a Speech-in-Multitalker Babble Paradigm to assess Word-recognition Performance. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14:453–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Divenyi PL, Stark PB, Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:1089–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH. Clinical experience with the Words-in-Noise Test on 3430 Veterans: Comparisons with Pure Tone Thresholds and Word Recognition in Quiet. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011; 22:405–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler WA, Verschuure H, Ludvigsen C, Westermann S. ICRA Noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. Audiology. 2001;40:148–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110: 2527–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David BM, Tse VYY, Schneider BA. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker? Hear Res. 2012; 290:55–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott SK, McGettigan C. The neural processing of masked speech. Hear Res. 2013;303:58–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL. The effects of energetic and informational masking on the Words- in-Noise Test (WIN). J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23:522–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders DA. Auditory Perception of Speech: An Introduction to Principles and Problems, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, PTR; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• McArd–e R, Wilson RH.Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young Listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19:507–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy DR, Daneman M, Schneider BA. Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychol Aging. 2006;21:49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, MacDonald EN. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2012; 33:349–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer KS, Freyman RL. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136:748–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zekveld AA, Erwin LJ, George ELJ, Houtgast T, Kramer S. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:1364–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H. The relationships between self-reported hearing disabilities and measure of auditory disability. Audiology. 1996;35:277–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zekveld AA, George ELJ, Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Houtgast T. The development of the Text Reception Threshold test: a visual analogue of the Speech Reception Threshold test. J Speech Lang Hearing Res. 2007;50:576–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates GA, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Crane PK, Feeney MP, Larson EB. Executive dysfunction and presbycusis in older persons with and without memory loss and dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2010;23:218–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser J, Festen JM, Goverts ST, Kramer SE, Pichora-Fuller MK. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies. Ear Hear. 2015;36:24–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benichov J, Cox LC, Tun PA, Wingfield A. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability and cognitive function. Ear Hear. 2012;32: 250–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce PA, Pisoni DB, Goldinger SD. Similarity Neighbourhoods of Spoken Words. In: Altmann G, editor. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 1990; p. 122–47.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson Gosselin PA, Gagné JP. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54:944–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. Age related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises. Ear Hear. 2012; 34;261–72.
   Google Scholar
• Veneman CE, Gordon-Salant S, Matthews LJ, Dubno JR. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2013;34:288–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, Stewart AJ, Moore DR, Barry JG, et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:433–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH, Carnell CS, Cleghorn AL. The Words-in-Noise (WIN) Test with multi-talker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18:522–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar