The importance of metabolite identification in quantitative risk estimation

References

• Wands R. C., Broome J. H. The Proceeding of the 5th Annual Conference on Environ. Toxicol. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio 1974, USAF, AMRL-TR-74–125-237
   Google Scholar
• 1977, Office of Pesticide Programs, Fed. Register, 42, 40009
   Google Scholar
• Nachtomi E. The metabolism of ethylene dibromide in the rat. The enzymatic reaction with glutathione in vivo and in vitro. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1970; 19: 2853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburger J. H. Toxicology, The Basic Science of Poisons, L. J. Casarett, J. Doull. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York 1975; 333
   Google Scholar
• Weisburger J. H., Williams G. M. Casarett and Doull's Toxicology, The Basic Science of Poisons2nd Ed., J. Doull, C. D. Klaassen, M. O. Andur. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York 1980; 84
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin R. W., Glaves D., Pimm M. V. Progress in Immunology, First International Congress in Immunology, B. Amos. Academic Press, New York 1975; 907
   Google Scholar
• Kraybill H. F. (1982) The Toxicology Forum, 1982 Annual Winter Meeting. 1982. Bowers Reporting Co., Washington, 145
   Google Scholar
• Krewski R. (1982) The Toxicology Forum, 1982 Annual Winter Meeting. 1982. Bowers Reporting Co., Washington, 212
   Google Scholar
• Armitage P. One-Hit Theory of Infectivity Tritation for Self-Reproducing Particles. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1959; 23: 1313
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ryzin J., Rai K. The Scientific Basis of Toxicity Assessment, H. Witschi. Elsevier, New York 1979; 273
   Google Scholar
• Crump K. S., Guess H. A., Deal K. L. Confidence Intervals and Tests of Hypothesis Concerning Dose Response Relations Inferred from Animal Carcinogenicity Data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley H. O., Sielken R. L. Estimation of “Safe Doses” in Carcinogenic Experiments. Biometrics 1977; 33: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski D., Van Ryzin J. Current Topics in Probability and Statistics, M. Csorgo, D. Dawson, J. N. K. Ruo, E. Salek. North-Holland, New York 1981; 1
   Google Scholar
• Druckrey H. Quantitative Aspects of Chemical Carcinogenesis, R. Truhaut. Springer-Derlag, New York 1967; 60
   Google Scholar
• Hoel D. G., Gaylor D. W., Kirschstein R. L., Schneiderman M. A. Estimation of Risks of Irreversible, Delayed Toxicity. J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 1975; 1: 133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker A. I. T., Thorpe E., Stevenson D. E. The Toxicology of Dieldrin I. Long-term Oral Toxicity Studies in Mice. Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol. 1972; 11: 415
   Google Scholar
• Bruce R. D., Carlton W. W., Ferber K. H., Hughes D. H., Quast J. E., Salsburg D. S., Smith J. M. Reexamination of the ED01 Study. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 1981; 1: 28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruce R. D., Carlton W. W., Ferber K. H., Hughes D. H., Quast J. E., Salsburg D. S., Smith J. M. Reexamination of the ED01 Study. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 1981; 1: 119
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe P. G., McGowan G. R., Madrid E. O., Gehring P. J. Fate of [14C] Vinyl Chloride following Inhalation Exposure in Rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1976; 37: 49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring P. J., Watanabe P. G., Park C. N. Risk of Angiosarcoma in Workers Exposed to Vinyl Chloride as Predicted from Studies in Rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1979; 49: 15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltoni C., Lefemine G. Carcinogenicity Assays of Vinyl Chloride: Current Results. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1975; 246: 195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler J. L. R. The Chemical Dynamics of Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis I. A Chemical-Kinetic Model of Dose-Response Relationships. Mutat. Res. 1974; 25: 169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutwell R. K. Carcinogenesis, T. J. Slaga, A. Swak, R. K. Boutwell, 1978; Vol. 2: 49
   Google Scholar
• Yanysheva N. Y., Antomonov V. G. Predicting the Risk of Tumor Occurrence under the Effect of Small Doses of Carcinogens. Environ. Hlth. Perspectives 1976; 13: 95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freireich E. J., Gehan E. A., Rall D. P., Schmidt L. M., Skipper H. E. Quantitative Comparison of Toxicity of Anti-Cancer Agents in Mouse, Rat, Dog, Monkey, and Man, Cancer Chemotherap. 1966; 219, Report, 50
   Google Scholar
• Rall D. P. Difficulties in Extrapolating the Results of Toxicity Studies in Laboratory Animals to Man. Environ. Res. 1969; 2: 360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel N., Schneiderman M. Estimating “Safe” Levels, A Hazardous Undertaking. Cancer Res. 1975; 35: 1379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitz R. H., Gehring P. J., Park C. N. Effects of Vinylidene Chloride on DNA Synthesis and DNA Repair, in the Rat and Mouse: A Comparative Study with Dimethylnitrosamine. Food Cosmetic. Toxicol. 1978; 16: 511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramner M. F. Estimation of Risks Due to Environmental Carcinogenesis. Med. and Pediatric Oncol. 1977; 3: 169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crouch E., Wilson R. Interspecies Comparison of Carcinogenic Potency. J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 1979; 5: 1095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson I. W. F., Sumner D. D., Parker J. C. Chloroform: A Review of its Metabolic, Teratogenic, Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potential. Drug and Chem. Toxicol. 1982; 5: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburger J. H., Williams G. M. Carcinogen Testing: Current Problems and New Approaches. Science 1981; 214: 23
   Google Scholar
• Ashby J., Styles J. A., Anderson D., Paton D. Saccharin: An Epigenetic Carcinogen/Mutagen?. Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol. 1978; 16: 95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brusick D. Principles of Genetic Toxicology. Plenum Press, New York and London 1980
   Google Scholar