The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis

References

• Kartono F, Maibach HI. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: An overview of tandem irritation studies. Contact Derm 2006;54:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappes UP, Göritz N, Wigger-Alberti W, Heinemann C, Elsner P. Tandem application of sodium lauryl sulfate and n-propanol does not lead to enhancement of cumulative skin irritation. Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:403–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Caferoglu Sakat S, Ismail Engin R, Ozyigit H, Atasoy M, Kaya Y. Acute irritant contact dermatitis caused by Plantago major. Contact Derm 2009;60:237–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machovcova A. Caustic ulcers caused by cement aqua: Report of a case. Ind Health 2010;48:215–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slodownik D, Lee A, Nixon R. Irritant contact dermatitis: A review. Australas J Dermatol 2008;49:1–9; quiz 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardesca E. Eemco guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: Electrical methods. Skin Research and Technology 1997;3:126–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm KP, Takiwaki H, Serup J. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm 1996;35:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm 1990;22:164–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger-Alberti W, Spoo J, Schliemann-Willers S, Klotz A, Elsner P. The tandem repeated irritation test: A new method to assess prevention of irritant combination damage to the skin. Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloor M, Senger B, Langenauer M, Fluhr JW. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate. Skin Res Technol 2004;10:144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonnier V, Morrison BM Jr, Paye M, Maibach HI. An open assay model to induce subclincal non-erythematous irritation. Contact Derm 2000;42:207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydonieus AF, Wille JJ, Murphy GF. Biochemical modulation of skin reactions. Transdermals, topicals, cosmetics. Boca Raton:CRC press, 2000:51.
   Google Scholar
• Branco N, Lee I, Zhai H, Maibach HI. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: An in vivo study. Contact Derm 2005;53:278–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effendy I, Maibach HI. Surfactants and experimental irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Derm 1995;33:217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluhr JW, Kuss O, Diepgen T, Lazzerini S, Pelosi A, Gloor M et al. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: Comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:696–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serup J, Jemec GBE, Grove GL. Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. Boca Raton:CRC press, 1995:168.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir SJ, Chew AL, Anigbogu A, Dreher F, Maibach HI. Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping. Skin Res Technol 2001;7:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breternitz M, Flach M, Prässler J, Elsner P, Fluhr JW. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: Integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler H, Dreher F, Maibach HI. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: Influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal. Br J Dermatol 2004;151:746–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigmann HJ, Ulrich J, Schanzer S, Jacobi U, Schaefer H, Sterry W et al. Comparison of transepidermal water loss and spectroscopic absorbance to quantify changes of the stratum corneum after tape stripping. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2005;18:180–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuYan-yu, WangXue-min, ZhouYu-tian, et al. Changing of biophysical parameter of skin before and after tape-stripping test. Chinese Journal of Dermatovenerology of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 2003;2:29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Haratake A, Uchida Y, Schmuth M, Tanno O, Yasuda R, Epstein JH et al. UVB-induced alterations in permeability barrier function: Roles for epidermal hyperproliferation and thymocyte-mediated response. J Invest Dermatol 1997;108:769–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguro S, Arai Y, Masukawa Y, Uie K, Tokimitsu I. Relationship between covalently bound ceramides and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Arch Dermatol Res 2000;292:463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frödin T, Molin L, Skogh M. Effects of single doses of UVA, UVB, and UVC on skin blood flow, water content, and barrier function measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry, optothermal infrared spectrometry, and evaporimetry. Photodermatol 1988;5:187–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang S, Koo SW, Lee SH. The morphologic changes in lamellar bodies and intercorneocyte lipids after tape stripping and occlusion with a water vapor-impermeable membrane. Arch Dermatol Res 1998;290:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee CH, Fartasch M, Agner T et al. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm 1997;37:53–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar