Allergic contact dermatitis: effect of age

References

• Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (2008). Allergic contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ale IS, Maibach HI (2008). Mechanisms in irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Weltfriend S, Maibach HI (2008). Irritant dermatitis: clinical heterogeneity and contributing factors. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber I, Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ. Chemical allergy: translating biology into hazard characterization. Toxicol Sci 2011;120 Suppl 1:S238–S268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlberg AT, Bergström MA, Börje A, Luthman K, Nilsson JL. Allergic contact dermatitis–formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 2008;21:53–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwangsukstith C, Maibach HI. Effect of age and sex on the induction and elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Derm 1995;33:289–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Derm 2001;44:201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freireich-Astman M, David M, Trattner A. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences. Contact Derm 2007;56:103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker FB, Smith PD, Maibach HI. Genetic factors in human allergic contact dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1967;32:453–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Clinical implications of aging skin: cutaneous disorders in the elderly. Am J Clin Dermatol 2009;10:73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder DN. Effect of age on epidermal immune function. Dermatol Clin 1986;4:447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roupe G. Some immunomodulating factors in allergic contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1978;58:65–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prystowsky SD, Allen AM, Smith RW, Nonomura JH, Odom RB, Akers WA. Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in a general population. Arch Dermatol 1979;115:959–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MK. Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Derm 1999;41:65–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landeck L, Gonzalez E, Baden LA, Neumann K, Schalock PC. Contact sensitization by age group in adults: patch-test data from the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis 2009;20:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenraads PJ, Bleumink E, Nater JP. Susceptibility to primary irritants: age dependence and relation to contact allergic reactions. Contact Derm 1975;1:377–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merk HF. Drug skin metabolites and allergic drug reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;9:311–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott H, Bergström MA, Heise R, Skazik C, Zwadlo-Klarwasser G, Merk HF et al. Cutaneous metabolic activation of carvoxime, a self-activating, skin-sensitizing prohapten. Chem Res Toxicol 2009;22:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejman E, Stoudemayer T, Grove G, Kligman AM. Age differences in poison ivy dermatitis. Contact Derm 1984;11:163–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh CL. Prevalence of contact allergy by sex, race and age. Contact Derm 1986;14:237–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton S, Nayagam AT, Keczkes K. Age and sex incidence of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Derm 1986;15:136–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young E, van Weelden H, van Osch L. Age and sex distribution of the incidence of contact sensitivity to standard allergens. Contact Derm 1988;19:307–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wöhrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly: influence of age and sex on sensitization patterns. Pediatr Dermatol 2003;20:119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 2003;149:986–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uter W, Schnuch A. Fragrance allergy increases with age. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:1218–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green CM, Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ. Contact allergy to topical medicaments becomes more common with advancing age: an age-stratified study. Contact Derm 2007;56:229–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey K, Xue W, Cooper K, Baron E. Age and gender effects on contact sensitization and photoimmune suppression in young and middle-aged adults. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2008;24:46–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg S, McDonagh AJ, Gawkrodger DJ. Age- and sex-related variations in allergic contact dermatitis to common allergens. Contact Derm 2009;61:46–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev 2009;41:67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seripa D, Pilotto A, Panza F, Matera MG, Pilotto A. Pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 (CYP) in the elderly. Ageing Res Rev 2010;9:457–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostynek JJ, Reagan KE, Maibach HI (2002). Nickel allergic hypersensitivity: prevalence and incidence by country, gender, age, and occupation. In: Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI, eds. Nickel and the Skin: Absorption, Immunology, Epidemiology, and Metallurgy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 39–82.
   Google Scholar
• Paramasivan P, Lai C, Pickard C, Ardern-Jones M, Healy E, Friedmann PS. Repeated low-dose skin exposure is an effective sensitizing stimulus, a factor to be taken into account in predicting sensitization risk. Br J Dermatol 2010;162:594–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar