Sensitivity to rubber chemicals

References

• Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1980
   Google Scholar
• Bonnevie P., Marcussen P. V. Rubber products as a widespread cause of eczema: Report of 80 cases. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1945; 25: 163
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Contact Dermatitis. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1973
   Google Scholar
• Adams R. M. Occupational Skin Disease. Grune & Stratton, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz L., Tulipan L., Birmingham D. J. Occupational Diseases of the Skin. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1957
   Google Scholar
• Stankevich V. V., Vlasyuk M. G., Prokof'eva L. G. Hygienic assessment of organosulfur accelerators for vulcanization of rubber for the food industry. Gig. Sanit. 1980; 10: 88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fregert S. Relapse of hand dermatitis after short contact with tyres. Contact Derm. Newsletter 1973; 7: 351
   Google Scholar
• Rietschel R. Role of socks in shoe dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1984; 120: 398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaul L. E., Underwood G. B. Preliminary irritants and sensitizers used in fabrication of footwear. Arch. Dermatol. 1949; 60: 649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries H. R. Allergic dermatitis due to shoes. Dermatologica 1964; 128: 68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shatin H., Reisch M. Dermatitis of the feet due to shoes. Arch. Derm. Syphil. 1954; 69: 651
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Some practical aspects of the diagnosis and management of shoe dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1959; 79: 267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston J. A., Hawkins K., Weston W. L. Foot dermatitis in children. Pediatrics 1983; 72: 824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrs F. Dermatitis from clothing and shoes. Contact Dermatitis, 3rd Ed., A. Fisher. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 283
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen P. Rubber footwear as a cause of foot eczema. Acta Dermatovenereol. 1942; 23: 331
   Google Scholar
• Roberts J. L., Hanifin J. M. Athletic shoe dermatitis. J.A.M.A. 1979; 241: 275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynde C. W., Mitchell J. C., Adams R., Maibach H., Schorr W., Storrs F., Taylor J. Patch testing with mercaptobenzothiazole and mercapto-mixes. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angelini G., Vena G., Meneghini C. Shoe contact dermatitis. Contact Derm. 1980; 6: 279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E. Shoe contact dermatitis. J.A.M.A. 1487; 209
   Google Scholar
• Cronin E. Shoe dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1966; 78: 617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams R. M. Shoe dermatitis. Calif. Med. 1972; 117: 12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer R., Ramsey D., Biondi E. The most common contact allergens. Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 108: 14
   Google Scholar
• Jordan W. P. Clothing and shoe dermatitis recognition and management. Postgrad. Med. 1972; 52: 143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl M. V. Contact dermatitis from footwear. Shoe dermatitis in 42 patients. Minn. Med. 1975; 58: 871
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varelzides A., Katsambas A., Georgala S., Capetanakis J. Shoe dermatitis in Greece. Der-matologica 1974; 149: 236
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Lichenoid dermatitis from isopropylaminodiphenylamine. Contact Derm. Newsletter 1971; 10: 237
   Google Scholar
• Leppard B. J., Parhizghar B. Contact dermatitis to PPD rubber Maleki shoes. Contact Derm. 1977; 3: 91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson H. T. H. Rubber glove dermatitis. Br. Med. J. 1960; 2: 21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson H. T. H. Rubber dermatitis: An investigation of 106 cases of contact dermatitis caused by rubber. Br. J. Dermatol. 1969; 87: 175
   Google Scholar
• Cronin E. Clinical prediction of patch test results. Trans. St. John's Hosp. Derm. Sot: 1972; 58: 153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor J. S. Rubber. Contact Dermatitis, 3rd Ed., A. Fisher. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 1986; 603
   Google Scholar
• Burry J. N., Kirk J., Turner T. Environmental dermatitis; patch tests in 1000 cases of allergic-contact dermatitis. Med. J. Austr. 1973; 2: 681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell J. C., Clendenning W. E., Cronin E., Fregert S., Kanof N. B., Maibach H. I. Patch testing with mercaptobenzothiazole and mercapto mix. Contact Derm. 1978; 2: 123
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S. Cross-sensitivity pattern of 2-mercaptobenzothizole (MBT). Acta Derm. Venereol. 1969; 49: 45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malten K. E. Tracing back a positive reaction to epoxy resin. Contact Derm. 1977; 3: 217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaguera C., Grimalt F. Statistical and comparative study of patients tested in Barcelona (1973–1977). Contact Derm. 1980; 6: 309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Napiorkowdka T., Czerwinska-Dihm I. Dermatitis from 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in photographic film. Contact Derm. 1981; 7: 43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurse D. S. Rubber sensitivity. Austr. J. Derm. 1979; 20: 31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Skog E. Allergic contact dermatitis from mercaptobenzothiazole in cutting oil. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1962; 42: 235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nethercott J. R. Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynde C. W., Warshawski L., Mitchell J. C. Screening patch test in 4190 eczema patients 1972–1981. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain S. L. Contact dermatitis in the west of Scotland. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brun R. Statistique des tests epicutanes positifs de 1000 cas d'eczema de contact. Dermatologica 1975; 150: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brun R. Evolution des facteurs d'eczema de contact dans une population. Epidemiologic 1975–1981. Dermatologica 1982; 165: 24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calas E., Astelain P., Pirion A. Epidemiologic des dermatoses de contact a Marseilles. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 1978; 105: 345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleffe J., Nopp-Oger M. J., Achten G. Batterie europeene de tests epicutanes. Bilan de 300 observations. Berufsdermatosen 1972; 20: 209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song M., De Greef H., De Mauberge J., Dooms Goosens J., Oleffe J. Contact sensitivity to rubber additives in Belgium. Dermatologica 1979; 158: 163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camarasa J. M. G. First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain-1977. Acta Derm. Venereol. (Stockh.) 1979; 59: 33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrup G., Dahlquist J., Rorsman H. Value of history and testing in suspected contact dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1970; 101: 212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Kleniewska D. The epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Poland. Br. J. Dermatol. 1970; 83: 543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert V. H., Berova N., Hegyi E., Jirasek L. |Contact allergy. Analysis of patch tests in five socialist lands of Europe], in German. Dermatol. Monatschr. 1982; 168: 613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirano S., Yoshikawa K. Patch testing with European and American standard allergens in Japanese patients. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C. C. Two-year experience with patch testing. J. Formosan Med. Assoc. 1980; 79: 220
   Google Scholar
• Rajan V. S., Khoo R. Allergic contact dermatitis in Singapore. Mod. Med. Asia 1980; 16: 54
   Google Scholar
• Moriearty P., Pereira C., Guimaraes N A. Contact dermatitis in Salvador, Brazil. Contact Derm. 1976; 2: 123
   Google Scholar
• Soto J. M. Sensibiladad por contacto en dermatitis eczematosas. Dermatol. Venezolana 1974; 13: 29
   Google Scholar
• North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 108: 537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veien N. K., Hattel T., Justesen O., Norholm A. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Derm. 1982; 7: 373
   Google Scholar
• Leyden J. J., Kligman A. M. Contact dermatitis to neomycin sulfate. J.A.M.A. 1979; 242: 1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank I. H., Miller O. G. Study of rubber adhesives in shoes as a cause of dermatitis of the feet. J.A.M.A. 1952; 149: 1371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson W. C. Shoe dermatitis. Minn. Med. 1968; 51: 409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannenbaum M. H. Spandex dermatitis. J.A.M.A. 1967; 200: 899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter P. S., Sommer R. G. Contact dermatitis due to spandex. Arch. Dermatol. 1967; 95: 666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph H. L., Maibach H. I. Contact dermatitis from spandex brassieres. J.A.M.A. 1967; 201: 880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allenby C. F., Crow K. D., Kirton V., Munro-Ashman D. Contact dermatitis from spandex yarn. Br. Med. J. 1966; 1: 674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Allergic contact spandex dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1967; 96: 607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammintausta K. Hand dermatitis in different hospital workers who perform wet work, Der-. matosen 1983; 31: 14
   Google Scholar
• Agathos V. M., Bernecker H. A. [Dermatitis of the hands among medical personnel), in German. Derm. Beruf. Umwelt 1982; 30: 43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson D. S., Wilkinson J. D. Comparison of patch test results in two adjacent areas of England: I. Industrial allergens. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1979; 59: 189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaChapelle J. M., Tennstedt D. Epidemiological survey of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands in Belgium. Contact Derm. 1979; 5: 244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Salazar Gomez L., Gomez Urcuyo J. F. Sensibilidad a los componentes de la goma en obreros de la construccion. Actas Dermosifiliograf 1976; 67: 297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emmett E. A. 1986, Final Report, CPSC-C84-1192
   Google Scholar
• North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Patch Testing in Allergic Contact Dermatitis, 6th Ed. American Academy of Dermatology, Evanston, III
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein L. E., Fellner M. J. Rubber band dermatitis. Int. Soc. Trop. Derm. 1979; 15: 558
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson G., Ostlund E. Rubber band note counters as the cause of eczema among employees at the Swedish Post Office. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1968; 48: 212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley W. B. Golf course dermatitis due to thiuram fungicide. J.A.M.A. 1967; 188: 415
   Google Scholar
• van Ketel W. G. Thiuram mix. Contact Derm. 1976; 2: 232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Themido R., Menezes Brandao F. Contact allergy to thiuram. Contact Derm. 1984; 10: 251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaul L. E. Contact dermatitis from synthetic oil of mustard. Arch. Dermatol. 1964; 90: 158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanan M. W. Contact dermatitis in Kuwait. J. Kuwait Med. Assoc. 1969; 3: 129
   Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Ostaszewski K., Gryzwa Z., Kozlowska A. Sensitivity to some rubber additives. Contact Derm. 1976; 2: 24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross J. B. Rubber boot dermatitis in Newfoundland: A survey of 30 patients. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1969; 4: 13
   Google Scholar
• Schultz K. H., Hermann W. P. 44-Dioxydiphenyl als ursache von schweib blattekzemen. Derm. Wochenschr. 1960; 141: 124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams R. M., Manchester R. D. Allergic contact dermatitis to Maneb in a housewife. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb P. K. Allergy to Antabuse and rubber. J.A.M.A. 1979; 241: 2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hecke E., Vermander F. Allergic contact sensitivity by oral disulfiram. Contact Derm. 1984; 10: 254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W. B. Side effects of disulfiram. Br. Med. J. 1962; 1: 1610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Ketel W. G. Rubber alcohol in eczema. Ned. Tijdsch. Geneeskd. 1968; 112: 406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis C. N., Mitchell A. J. Tar gel interaction with disulfiram. Arch. Dermatol. 1979; 115: 1367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoll D., King L. E. Disulfiram-alcohol skin reaction to beer-containing shampoo. J.A.M.A. 1980; 244: 2045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonning L., Hjorth N. Cross-sensitization between hair dyes and rubber chemicals. Berufsdermatosen 1969; 17: 100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kligman A. M., Magnusson B. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig. Identification of Contact Allergens. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, III 1970
   Google Scholar
• Roed-Peterson J., Hjorth N., Jordan W. P., Bourlas M. Postsorters' rubber fingerstall dermatitis. Contact Derm. 1977; 3: 143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herve-Bazin B., Gradiski D., Duprat P., Marignac B., Foussereau J., Cavalier C., Bieber P. Occupational eczema from N-isopropyl-N′-phenylparaphenylene-diamine (IPPD) and N-methyl-1,3-butyl-N′-phenylparaphenylene-diamine (DMPPD) in tyres. Contact Derm. 1977; 3: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber P., Foussereau J. Role de deux amines aromatiques dans l'allergie au caoutchouc; PBN et 4010 NA, amine antioxydantes dans I'industrie du pneu. Bull. Soc. Franc. Dermatol. Syphiligr. 1968; 75: 63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ancona A., Monroy F., Fernandez-Diez J. Occupational dermatitis from IPPD in tyres. Contact Derm. 1983; 8: 91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpikari I. Occupational contact dermatitis among rubber workers. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varigos G. A., Dunt D. R. Occupational dermatitis, An epidemiological study in the rubber and cement industries. Contact Derm. 1981; 7: 105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nater J. P. [Hypersensitivity to rubber], in German. Berufsdermatosen 1975; 20: 209
   Google Scholar
• Brandao Menezes F. Occupational contact dermatitis from rubber antioxidants. Contact Derm. 1978; 4: 246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foussereau J., Cavalier C. Has N-isopropyl-N'-phenylparaphenylenediamine a place among standard allergens? Importance of this allergen in rubber intolerance. Dermatologica 1977; 755: 164
   Google Scholar
• Batchvarow B., Minkow D. M. Dermatitis and purpura from rubber in clothing. Trans. St. John's Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 1968; 54: 178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romaguera C., Grimalt F. PPPP syndrome. Contact Derm. 1977; 3: 102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vollum D. I., Marten R. H. Contact dermatitis from 4-isopropyl-amino-diphenylamine. Trans. St. John's Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 1968; 54: 73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan W. P. Contact dermatitis from N-isopropyl-N'-paraphenylenediamine. Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 103: 85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maibach H. I. Scuba diver facial dermatitis: Allergic contact dermatitis to N-isopropyl-N'-phenylparaphenylenediamine. Contact Derm. 1975; 7: 330
   Google Scholar
• Tennstedt D., LaChapelle J. M. Windsurfer dermatitis from black rubber components. Contact Derm. 1981; 7: 160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Diethyldithiocarbamate in adhesive tape. Contact Derm. 1978; 4: 61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan W. P., Bourlas M. C. Allergic contact dermatitis to underwear elastic chemically transformed by laundry bleach. Arch. Dermatol. 1975; 111: 593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen K. S. Occupational dermatoses in hospital cleaning women. Contact Derm. 1983; 9: 343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintum J. C., Nater J. P. Allergic contact eczema due to rubber additive in cattle farming. Dermatologica 1974; 148: 42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lintum J. C., Nater J. P. Contact dermatitis caused by rubber chemicals in dairy workers. Berufsdermatosen 1973; 21: 16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Diphenylguanidine in rubber hoses. Contact Derm. 1978; 4: 241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camarasa J. M. G., Alomar A. Allergic rhinitis from diphenylguanidine. Contact Derm. 1978; 4: 242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis G. H. Contact dermatitis of eyelids caused by an antioxidant in rubber fillers of eyelash curlers. Arch. Dermatol. 1945; 52: 262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman A., Hagelthorn G., Jeanson E., Karlberg A. T., Rystedt I., Wahlberg J. E. Phenyl-alphanaphthylamine-a case report and guinea pig studies. Contact Derm. 1980; 6: 299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diethylthiourea. 1979, NCI-CG-TR-149. NTP Technical Report
   Google Scholar
• Adams R. M. Contact allergic dermatitis due to diethylthiourea in a wetsuit. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen K. E. Diethylthiourea contact dermatitis from an acidic detergent. Contact Derm. 1983; 9: 146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W. G., Vickers H. R. Diethylthiourea as a cause of dermatitis in a car factory. Br. J. Indust. Med. 1970; 27: 167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanerva L., Jolanki R., Plosila M., Estlander T. Contact dermatitis from dibutylthiourea. Report of a case with fine structural observations of epicutaneous testing with dibutylthiourea. Contact Derm. 1984; 70: 158
   Google Scholar
• Dooms-Goosens A., den Boy B., Ceuterick A., DeGreef H. Dimethylthiourea, an unexpected hazard for textile workers. Contact Derm. 1979; 5: 367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruze M., Fregert S. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylene thiourea. Contact Derm. 1983; 9: 208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landner L., Bjorndal H., During L. Slemkampningsmedel inom svensk papersindustri. Inst, vatten-ochluftvardfoskning, Stockholm 1976; 281, Box 21060, S-10031
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Trulson L., Zimerson E. Contact allergic reactions to diphenylthiourea and phenylisothiocyanate in PVC adhesive tape. Contact Derm. 1982; 5: 38
   Google Scholar
• Oliver E. A., Schwartz L., Warren H. I. Occupational leukoderma: Preliminary report. J.A.M.A. 1939; 113: 921
   Google Scholar
• van der Waale H. B., Delbreivine L. P., Seutter E. Concomitant sensitization to hydroquinone and p-methoxyphenol in the guinea pig: Inhibitors in acrylic monomers. Contact Derm. 1982; 8: 147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studies in progress. 1987, Hydroquinone, Mutagenicity, Gavage study. NTP Report
   Google Scholar