The SDA Alternatives Program Phase III: Comparison of in Vitro Data with Animal Eye Irritation Data on Solvents, Surfactants, Oxidizing Agents, and Prototype Cleaning Products

References

• Booman K. A., Cascieri T. M., Demetrulias J., Driedger A., Griffith J. F., Grochoski G. T., Kong B., McCormick W. C., III, North-Root H., Rozen M. G., Sedlak R. I. In vitro methods for estimating eye irritancy of cleaning products. Phase I: Preliminary assessment. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1988; 7(3)173–185
   Google Scholar
• Booman K. A., De Prospo J., Demetrulias J., Driedger A., Griffith J. F., Grochoski G., Kong B., McCormick W. C., III, North-Root H., Rozen M. G., Sedlak R. I. The SDA alternatives program: Comparison of in vitro data with Draize test data. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1989; 8(1)35–49
   Google Scholar
• McCormick W. C., III. The SDA approach to phase III and beyond. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1989; 8(1)115–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith J. F., Nixon G. A., Bruce R. D., Reer P. J., Bannan E. A. Dose-response studies with chemical irritants in the albino rabbit eye as a basis for selecting optimum testing conditions for predicting hazard to the human eye. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1980; 55: 501–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer Products Safety Commission. Federal Hazardous Substances Act Regulations. 1973, Section 1500.42, 38 (no. 187)
   Google Scholar
• Shopsis C., Eng B. Rapid cytotoxicity testing, using a semi-automated protein determination on cultured cells. Toxicol. Lett. 1985; 26: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shopsis C., Borenfreund E., Stark D. M. Validation studies on a battery of potential in vitro alternatives to the Draize test. Alternative Methods in Toxicology, A. Goldberg. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., New York 1987; Vol. 5: 31–44, In Vitro Toxicology, Approaches to Validation
   Google Scholar
• Bagley D. M., Rizvi P. Y., Kong B. M., De Salva S. J. Factors affecting use of the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane as a model for predicting eye irritation potential: I. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1991; 10(1&2)95–104
   Google Scholar
• Bagley D. M., Rizvi P. Y., Kong B. M., De Salva S. J. Evaluation of the vascular components of the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane as a model for predicting eye irritation potential: II. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1991; 10(1&2)105–113
   Google Scholar
• Chan K. Y. An in vitro alternative to the Draize test. Alternative Methods in Toxicology, vol. 3, In Vitro Toxicology, A. Goldberg. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., New York 1985; 405–422
   Google Scholar
• Chan K. Y. Release of plasminogen activator by cultured epithelial cells during differentiation and wound closure. Exp. Eye Res. 1986; 42(5)417–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan K. Y. Chemical injury to an in vitro ocular system: Differential release of plasminogen activator. Curr. Eye Res. 1986; 5(5)357–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan K. Y. Design and correlation of the CEPA test: An in vitro ocular irritation test. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1987; 6(3)207–214
   Google Scholar
• Tissue Culture Methods and Applications, P. F. Kruse, M. K. Patterson. Academic Press, New York 1973; 395–396
   Google Scholar
• Gay R. J., Swiderek M., Nelson D., Nelson T. J. The Living Dermal Equivalent as an in vitro model for predicting ocular irritation. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1992; 11: 47–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenfreund E., Puerro J. A. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alternatives and neutral red absorption. Toxicol. Lett 1985; 24: 119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triglia D., Wegener P. T., Harbell J., Wallace K., Matheson D., Shopsis C. Interlaboratory validation study of the keratinocyte neutral red bioassay from Clonetics Corporation. In Vitro Toxicol 1990; 357–365
   Google Scholar
• North-Root H., Yackovitch F., Demetrulias J., Gacula M., Jr., Heinze J. E. Evaluation of an in vitro cell toxicity test using rabbit corneal cells to predict the eye irritation potential of surfactants. Toxicol. Lett. 1982; 14: 207–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman J. Preliminary findings on the use of protozoa (Tetrahymena hydrophila) as models for ocular irritation in rabbits. Lab. Anim. Sci. 1983; 33: 56–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations. U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC 1982, Revised January 1, 1981, Title 16, Subchapter C, Federal Hazardous Substances Act, Part 1500.42 (Test for eye irritants)
   Google Scholar
• Pesticide Assessment Guidelines: Subdivision F. Hazard Evaluation, Human and Domestic Animals. 1982; 53–54, Section 81–4: Primary Eye Irritation Study
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 58, Good Laboratory Practices for Non-Clinical Studies
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. publication no. 86–23, 1985, revised
   Google Scholar
• Falahee K. J., Rose C. S., Olin S. S., Seifried H. E. Eye irritation testing: An assessment of methods and guidelines for testing materials for eye irritancy. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 1981; 26–28, (EPA-560/11–82-001). Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
   Google Scholar
• Schneider C. J. The ingestion hazard of dishwasher detergents and liquid waxes and polishes. Buffalo, NY 1970, CAL report no. VZ2926-D-7, prepared for the national Commission on Product Safety by Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L., Friedman J. H. Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation. Discussion follows. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1985; 80(391)580–597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker R. A., Chambers J. M., Wilks A. R. The New S Language–A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, CA 1988
   Google Scholar
• S-PLUS, version 2.0. Statistical Sciences, Inc., Seattle, WA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Neun D. J. The effects of alkalinity on the eye irritation potential of solutions prepared at a single pH. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocular Toxicol. 1993; 12(3)227–231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar