164
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigating the effects of a craving induction procedure on cognitive bias in cannabis users

, , , &
Pages 97-109 | Received 30 Oct 2008, Accepted 16 Dec 2008, Published online: 08 Jan 2010

References

  • Adamson SJ, Sellman JD. A prototype screening document for cannabis use disorder: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in an alcohol-dependent clinical sample. Drug and Alcohol Review 2003; 22: 309–315
  • Attwood AS, O'Sullivan H, Leonards U, Mackintosh B, Munafo MR. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction 2009; 103: 1875–1882
  • Bradley BP, Garner M, Hudson L, Mogg K. Influence of negative affect on selective attention to smoking-related cues and urge to smoke in cigarette smokers. Behavioural Pharmacology 2007; 18: 255–263
  • Copeland J, Gilmour S, Gates P, Swift W. The Cannabis Problems Questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2005; 80: 313–319
  • Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. The Addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological Bulletin 2006; 132: 443–476
  • Cox WM, Pothos EM, Hosier SG. Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers’ success in changing. Psychopharmacology 2007; 192: 499–510
  • Cox WM, Yeates GN, Regan CM. Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999; 55: 85–89
  • Duka T, Townshend JM. The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 2004; 176: 353–361
  • Fals-Stewart W, O’Farrell TJ, Freitas TT, McFarlin SK, Rutigliano P. The timeline followback reports of psychoactive substance use by drug-abusing patients: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 134–144
  • Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008; 97: 1–20
  • Field M, Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 2005; 183: 350–357
  • Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 85: 75–82
  • Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2008; 39: 209–218
  • Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Eye movements to smoking-related cues: Effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology 2004b; 173: 116–123
  • Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology 2005; 180: 63–72
  • Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology 2004a; 176: 88–93
  • Field M, Munafo MR, Franken IHA. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between subjective craving and attentional bias in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin 2008, in press
  • Franken IHA. Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 2003; 27: 563–579
  • Heishman SJ, Singleton EG, Liguori A. Marijuana Craving Questionnaire: Development and initial validation of a self-report instrument. Addiction 2001; 96: 1023–1034
  • Hester R, Dixon V, Garavan H. A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 81: 251–257
  • Hogarth L, Duka T. Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: Is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?. Psychopharmacology 2006; 184: 553–566
  • Millisecond Software. Inquisit 1.33 [computer software]. Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA 2002
  • Lubman DI, Peters LA, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Deakin JFW. Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychological Medicine 2000; 30: 169–175
  • Martin G, Copeland J, Gates P, Gilmour S. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: Reliability, validity, and diagnostic cut-off. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 83: 90–93
  • Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, De Houwer J. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: Relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 2003; 98: 825–836
  • Musshoff F, Madea B. Review of biological matrices (urine, blood, hair) as indicators of recent or ongoing cannabis use. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2006; 28: 155–163
  • Ryan F. Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: Cognitive processing of cues in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2002; 10: 67–76
  • Schoenmakers T, Wiers RW, Field M. Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2008; 197: 169–178
  • Shadel WG, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Effect of different cue stimulus delivery channels on craving reactivity: Comparing in vivo and video cues in regular cigarette smokers. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2001; 32: 203–209
  • Singleton EG, Trotman AJM, Zavahir M, Taylor RC, Heishman SJ. Determination of the reliability and validity of the marijuana questionnaire using imagery scripts. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2002; 10: 47–53
  • Swift W, Copeland J, Hall W. Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. Addiction 1998; 93: 1681–1692
  • Thalheimer W, Cook S. How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. 2002, [Retrieved November 19th, 2006]. Available from: http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm
  • Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, Grenard J, Ames SL, Stacy AW. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 2007; 86: 263–83
  • Yaxley RH, Zwaan RA. Attentional bias affects change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005; 12: 1106–1111

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.