Drug treatment outcomes in the criminal justice system: What non-self-report measures of outcome can tell us

References

• Barnard, M., Webster, S., O’Connor, W., Jones, A., & Donmall, M. (2009). The drug treatment outcomes research study (DTORS): Qualitative study (Research Report No. 26). London: Home office.
   Google Scholar
• Barnea A, Rahav G, Teichman M. The reliability and consistency of self reports on substance use in a longitudinal study. British Journal of Addiction 1987; 82: 891–898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bean P. Drugs and crime, 2nd. Willan Publishing, Devon 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., & Holloway, K. (2005). Understanding drugs, alcohol and crime. Open University Press: Maidenhead.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Day E, Homayoun S, Lenton H, Moverley R, Openshaw M. Treatment retention in the DIP: Do primary drug-users fare better than offenders?. Drugs: education, prevention and policy 2008; 15: 201–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Day E, Morgan B, Oza T, Copello A, Gossop M. What treatment means in practice: An analysis of the delivery of evidence-based interventions in criminal justice drug treatment services in Birmingham, England. Addiction Research and Theory 2009; 17: 678–687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Wood K, Sweeting R, Morgan B, Day E. Fitting a quart into a black box: Keyworking in quasi-coercive drug treatment in England. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2010; 17: 370–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall S. Officially recorded convictions from probationers: The relationship with self-report and supervisory observations. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2005; 10: 121–131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington DP. Self-reported and official offending in from adolescence to adulthood. Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency, MW Klein. Kulwer Academic, Dordrecht 1989; 399–423
   Google Scholar
• Finch E, Strang J. Reliability and validity of self-report: On the importance of considering context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1998; 51: 269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friendship C, Thornton D, Erikson M, Beech A. Reconviction: A critique and comparison of main data sources in England and Wales. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2001; 6: 121–129
   Google Scholar
• General Accountability Office (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes (Gao-05-219). Washington, DC: General Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey C, Stewart D, Gossop M. Economic analysis of costs and consequences of the treatment of drug misuse: 2-year outcome data from the national treatment outcome research study (NTORS). Addiction 2004; 99: 697–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P.J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 143–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop, M. (2005). Drug misuse treatment and reductions in crime: Findings from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS) (Research briefing No. 8). London: NTA.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Rolfe A. Reductions in acquisitive crime and drug-use after treatment of addiction problems: 1-year follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 58: 165–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop, M., Trakada, K., Stewart, D., & Witton, J. (2006). Levels of conviction following drug treatment – linking data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study and the Offenders Index (Findings No. 275). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1995). Young people and crime (Home Office Research Study No. 145). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire TK, Burke AC. The relationship of legal coercion to readiness to change among adults with alcohol and other drug problems. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004; 26: 35–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, P. (2002, July). The Role of the National Treatment Agency within the Criminal Justice System. Paper presented at Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: One year Conference, Leicester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. Digest four. Home Office, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Hood R, Sparks R. Key issues in criminology. Widenfeld and Nicolson, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., Clancy, A., McSweeney, T., & Turnbull, P.J. (2003). The impact of drug treatment and testing orders on offending: Two-year reconviction results (Findings No. 184). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Weston, S., Moody, A., Millar, T., Doling, L., Anderson, T., & Donmall, M. (2007). The drug treatment outcomes research study (DTORS): Baseline report (Research Report No. 3). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Donmal, M., Millar, T., Moody, A., Weston, S., Anderson, T., … , D’Souza, J. (2009). The drug treatment outcome research study (DTORS): Final outcomes report (Research Report No. 24). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Keane J. A case-linkage study of the relationship between drug misuse, crime and pyschosocial problems in a total criminal justice population. Addiction Research and Theory 2005; 13: 489–502
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick B, Howlett M, Sedgwick P, Ghodse AH. Drug use, self report and urinalysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 58: 111–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura S, Goldsmith D, Casriel C, Goldstein PJ, Lipton DS. The validity of methadone clients’ self-reported drug use. International Journal of Addiction 1987; 22: 727–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh J, Bloor M, Robertson M. The effect of drug treatment upon the commission of acquisitive crime. Journal of Substance Use 2007; 12: 375–384
   Google Scholar
• McIvor G. Reconviction following drug treatment and testing orders. Scottish Executive Social Research, Edinburgh 2004
   Google Scholar
• McMurran M. What works in substance misuse treatments for offenders?. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2007; 17: 225–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McSweeney T, Hough M. Drugs and alcohol. Willan, Cullompton 2005
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney T, Stevens A, Hunt N, Turnbull PJ. Twisting arms or a helping hand? Assessing the impact of ‘coerced’ and comparable ‘voluntary’ drug treatment options. British Journal of Criminology 2007; 47: 470–490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney T, Turnbull P, Hough M. The treatment supervision of drug-dependent offenders: A review of the literature prepared for the UK drug policy commission. UKDPC, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Millar T, Jones A, Donmall M, Roxborough M. Changes in offending following prescribing treatment for drug misuse (NTA Research briefing No. RB35). NTA, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. The drug treatment and testing order: Early lessons. The Stationary Office, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency (NTA) (2009). Breaking the link: The role of drug treatment in tackling crime. Retrieved from www.nta.nhs.uk
   Google Scholar
• Nurco DN. A long-term programme of research on drug use and crime. Substance Use and Misuse 1998; 33: 1817–1837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford J. Asking the right questions in the right way: The need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction. Addiction 2008; 103: 875–885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyton EA, Gossweiler R. Treatment services in adult drug courts: Report on the 1999 national drug court treatment survey, executive summary. US Department of Justice and US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Powell CL, Bamber D, Christie MM. Drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Lessons learned from offenders on DTTOs. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2007; 14: 333–345
   Google Scholar
• Powell C, Bankart J, Christie M, Bamber D, Arrindell T. Drug testing in the criminal justice system: Solutions to a costly commodity. Journal of Substance Use 2009; 14: 393–407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T, Bliss P, Murphy K, Brooker C. Engagement with drug treatment and testing orders: A qualitative study. Addiction Research and Theory 2005; 13: 65–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub M, Stevens A, Berto D, Hunt N, Kerschl V, McSweeney T, , Uchtenhagen A, et al. Comparing outcomes of ‘voluntary’ and ‘quasi-compulsory’ treatment of substance dependence in Europe. European Addiction Research 2010; 16: 53–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, A., & Whiting, E. (2006). Re-offending of adults: Results form the 2003 cohort (Home Office Statistical Bulletin 20/06). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Berto D, Frick U, Hunt N, Kerschl V, McSweeney T, , Werdenich W, et al. The relationship between legal status, perceived pressure and motivation in treatment for drug dependence: Results from a European study of quasi-compulsory treatment. European Addiction Research 2006; 12: 197–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P.J., McSweeney, T., Webster, R., Edmunds, M., & Hough, M. (2000). Drug treatment and testing orders: Final evaluation report (Home Office Research Study No. 212). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wild TC, Newton-Taylor B, Alleto R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: Structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behavior 1998; 23: 81–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar