Beyond illusion of control: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of gambling in the context of information technology

References

• Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction 2002; 97: 487–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro PH, Winefield AH. Predictors of irrational thinking in slot-machine gambling. Journal of Psychology 2000; 134: 117–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson M. Internal and external determinants of persistent gambling: Problems in generalising from one form of gambling to another. Journal of Gambling Studies 1993; 9: 225–245
   Google Scholar
• Dumont M, Ladouceur R. Evaluation of motivation among video poker players. Psychological Reports 1990; 66: 95–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginakis S, Ohtsuka K. Problem gambling: An exploration of the role of global personal hopefulness, short term gambling hope and illusion of control beliefs. Gambling Research 2005; 17: 7–16
   Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Irwin JR. Special random numbers: Beyond the illusion of control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006; 99: 161–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies 1993; 9: 101–120
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology 1994; 85: 351–369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. Adolescent gambling. Routledge, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Mayrand M. Evaluation of the ‘illusion of control’: Type of feedback, outcome sequence, and number of trials among regular and occasional gamblers. Journal of Psychology 1984; 117: 37–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Sylvain C, Boutin C, Doucet C. Understanding and treating the pathological gambler. New York, Wiley 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Walker M. A cognitive perspective on gambling. Trends in cognitive and behavioural therapies, P.M. Salkovkis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 1996; 89–120
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975; 32: 311–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M.D. (2011). What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, in press. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-011-9312-y.
   Google Scholar
• Moore SM, Ohtsuka K. Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies 1999; 13: 207–213
   Google Scholar
• Newton E, Larkin M, Melhuish R, Wykes T. More than just a place to talk: Young people's experiences of group psychological therapy as an early intervention for auditory hallucinations. Psychology and Psychotherapy, Theory, Research and Practice 2007; 80: 127–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn M, Smith JA. The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology 1998; 3: 65–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke, A. (2008). An explorative investigation of the effects of information technology on gambling and gambling-related behaviours (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Parke A, Griffiths MD. Poker gambling virtual communities: The use of Computer-Mediated Communication to develop cognitive poker gambling skills. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning 2011; 2: 31–44
   Google Scholar
• Parke, J., Rigbye, J., Parke, A., & Vaughan-Williams, L. (2007). Global Online Gambler Survey. Report prepared for eCommerce and Online Gaming Regulation and Assurance.
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Presson PK, Benassi VA. Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1996; 11: 493–512
   Google Scholar
• Raylu N, Oei T. Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review 2002; 22: 1009–1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe L, Tarrier N. Towards a cognitive-behavioural theory of problem gambling. British Journal of Psychiatry 1993; 162: 407–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw RL. Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology?. Health Psychology Update 2001; 10: 4, 48–52
   Google Scholar
• Sklansky D, Malmuth M. Hold’em poker for advanced players. Two Plus Two, Henderson, NV 1994
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA. Validity and qualitative psychology. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, J.A. Smith. Sage, London 2003; 232–236
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, J.A. Smith. Sage, London 2003; 51–80
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA. Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. Erblaum, London 1988
   Google Scholar
• Walker MB. Irrational thinking among slot machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies 1992; 8: 245–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., & Piggot, S. (2007) British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. London: The Stationary Office. Report prepared for the Gambling Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Willig C. Interpretative phenomenology. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method, C. Willig. Open University Press, London 2001; 50–69
   Google Scholar
• Wohl MJA, Enzle ME. Illusion of control by proxy: Placing one's fate in the hands of another. British Journal of Social Psychology 2009; 48: 183–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar