Simultaneously treatable and punishable: Implications of the production of addicted subjects in a drug treatment court

References

• Allard, P., Lyons, T., & Elliott, R. (2011). Impaired judgment: Assessing the appropriateness of drug treatment courts as a response to drug use in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GL. Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research 1989; 59: 249–270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge V, Edwards G. Opium and the people: Opiate use in Nineteenth-Century England. Allen Lane, London 1981
   Google Scholar
• Boshears P, Boeri M, Harbry L. Addiction and sociality: Perspectives from methamphetamine users in suburban USA. Addiction Research and Theory 2011; 19: 289–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgois P. Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 2000; 24: 165–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd SC. From witches to crack moms: Women, drug law, and policy. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Boyd SC. Hooked: Drug war films in Britain, Canada and the United States. Routledge, New York 2008
   Google Scholar
• Bransford CL. The use of critical ethnography in managed mental health care settings. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 2006; XXXIII: 173–191
   Google Scholar
• Brown CG, Stewart SH. Making harm reduction work when treating women for alcohol use problems. Highs & lows: Canadian perspectives on women and substance use, N. Poole, L. Greaves. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON 2007; 431–440
   Google Scholar
• Butler J. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. Routledge, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Butler J. Imitation and gender insubordination. The new social theory reader, S. Siedman, J. Alexander. Routledge, New York 2001; 333–345
   Google Scholar
• Carey SM, Finigan MW. A detailed cost analysis in a mature drug court setting: A cost-benefit evaluation of the Multnomah County drug court. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 2004; 20: 315–338
   Google Scholar
• Christie T, Anderson J. Drug treatment courts are popular but do they work and are they ethical and appropriate for Canada?. Health Law in Canada 2003; 23: 70–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dell CA, Lyons T. Harm reduction policies and programs for persons of Aboriginal descent. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Ottawa, ON 2007
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. Drug treatment court funding program: Summative evaluation final report. Department of Justice, Ottawa 2009
   Google Scholar
• Drug Policy Alliance. Drug courts are not the answer: Toward a health-centered approach to drug use. Drug Policy Alliance, Washington, DC 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fischer B. Doing good with a vengeance: A critical assessment of the practices, effects and implications of drug treatssssssment courts in North America. Criminal Justice 2003; 3: 227–248
   Google Scholar
• Foddy B. Addiction and its sciences – philosophy. Addiction 2010; 106: 25–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 1982; 8: 777–795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia A. The elegiac addict: History, chronicity, and the melancholic subject. Cultural Anthropology 2008; 23: 718–746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstl-Pepin, C.I. (2004). The future of postcritical ethnography: A case for collective action. In G.W. Noblit, S.Y. Flores, & M.E.G. (Eds.), Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique (pp. 385–396). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliksman L, Newton-Taylor B, Patra J, Rehm J. Toronto Drug Treatment Court: Evaluation project final report. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON 2004
   Google Scholar
• Gorkoff K, Weinrath M, Appel J. Winnipeg Drug Treatment Court interim evaluation. University of Winnipeg Department of Criminal Justice, Winnipeg 2007
   Google Scholar
• Graham MD, Richard AY, Ladislav V, Wood RA. Addiction as a complex social process: An action theoretical perspective. Addiction Research and Theory 2008; 16: 121–133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield SF, Pirard S. Gender-specific treatment for women with substance use disorders. Women and addiction: A comprehensive handbook, K.T. Brady, S.E. Back, S.F. Greenfield. The Guilford Press, New York 2009; 289–306
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez L, Bourgon G. Drug treatment courts: A quantitative review of study and treatment quality. Justice Research and Policy 2012; 14: 47–77
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley R, Reid M. Why the pervasive addiction myth is still believed. Addiction Research & Theory 2002; 10: 7–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora PF. Courting new solutions using problem-solving justice: Key components, guiding principles, strategies, responses, models, approaches, blueprints and tool kits. Chapman Journal of Criminal Justice 2011; 2: 7–52
   Google Scholar
• Kalant H. Culture-bound concepts of addiction: Still a potent influence. Addiction 2008; 103: 1948–1949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laster K, Raman P. Law for one and one for all? An intersectional legal subject. Sexing the subject of law, N. Naffine, R.J. Owens. Sweet & Maxwell, Auckland 1997; 193–212
   Google Scholar
• Mackinem MB, Higgins P. Tell me about the test: The construction of truth and lies in drug court. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2007; 36: 223–251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloch, M.S. (2000). Women, drugs and custody: , The experiences of women drug users in prison. Hampshire, UK: Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller EJ. Drugs, courts, and the new penology. Stanford Law & Policy Review 2009; 20: 417–461
   Google Scholar
• Moore D, Lyons T. Sentenced to treatment/sentenced to harm: Women, risk and the drug treatment courts. Routledge-Cavendish, New York 2007; 183–203
   Google Scholar
• Naffine N. Law & the sexes: Explorations in feminist jurisprudence. Allen & Unwin, Sydney 1990
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice (2006). Drug courts: The second decade. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan J. Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey 2001
   Google Scholar
• Nolan JL. Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm. Substance Use & Misuse 2002; 37: 1723–1750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nored LS, Carlan PE. Success of drug court programs: Examination of the perceptions of drug court personnel. Criminal Justice Review 2008; 33: 329–342
   Google Scholar
• Quantz R. Critical ethnography in education (with some postmodern considerations). The handbook of qualitative research in education, M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, J. Preissle. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1992; 447–505
   Google Scholar
• Rafalovich A. Keep coming back! Narcotics anonymous narratives and recovering-addict identity. Contemporary Drug Problems 1999; 26: 131–157
   Google Scholar
• Rideauwood Addiction and Family Services. Ottawa Drug Treatment Court program case management practice guidelines. Rideauwood Addiction and Family Services, Ottawa, ON 2008
   Google Scholar
• Simpson M, McNulty J. Different needs: Women’s drug use and treatment in the UK. International Journal of Drug Policy 2008; 19: 169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers JM, Currie L, Moniruzzaman A, Eiboff F, Patterson M. Drug treatment court of Vancouver: An empirical evaluation of recidivism. International Journal of Drug Policy 2012; 23: 393–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J. Doing critical ethnography. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Tiger R. Drug courts and the logic of coerced treatment. Sociological Forum 2011; 26: 169–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt A, Keith B. Substance use among women in ‘the sticks'. Highs & lows: Canadian perspectives on women and substance use, N. Poole, L. Greaves. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON 2007; 37–50
   Google Scholar
• Valverde M. Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998
   Google Scholar
• Whiteacre KW. Strange bedfellows: The tensions of coerced treatment. Criminal Justice Policy Review 2007; 18: 260–273
   Google Scholar
• Wilson DB, Mitchell O, MacKenzie DL. A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology 2006; 2: 459–487
   Google Scholar
• Wong CCY, Mill J, Fernandes C. Drugs and addiction: An introduction to epigenetics. Addiction 2011; 106: 480–489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar