References
- Brown L., Jr. Responsible take-home medication practices. Rockville, MD 1993; 67–72, State Methadone Treatment Guidelines DHHS publication No. (SMA) 93–1991
- Calsyn D. A., Saxon A. J., Barndt C D. Urine screening practices in methadone maintenance clinics: A survey of how results are utilized. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1991; 179: 222–227
- Calsyn D. A., Wells E. A., Saxon A. J., Jackson T. R., Wrede A. F., Stanton V., Fleming C. Contingency management of urinalysis results and intensity of tretment have an interactive impact on methadone maintenance treatment ourcome. Journal of Addictive Diseases 1994; 13: 47–63
- Iguchi M. Y., Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I. A. Contingency management in methadone maintenance: effects of reinforcing and aversive consequences on illicit polydrug. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1988; 22: 1–7
- Magura S., Casriel C, Goldsmith D. S., Strug D. L., Lipton D. S. Contingency contracting with polydrug-abusing methadone patients. Addictive Behaviors 1988; 13: 113–118
- McLellan A. T., Arndt I. O., Metzger D. S., Woody G. E., O'Brien C. P. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269: 1953–1959
- Milby J. B., Garrett C., English C., Frtischi O., Clarke C. Take-home methadone: contingency effects on drug-seeking and productivity of narcotic addicts. Addictive Behaviors 1978; 3: 215–220
- Skinner B. F. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1938
- Stitzer M., Bigelow G. Contingency management in a methadone maintenance program: availability of reinforcers. The International Journal of the Addictions 1978; 13: 737–746
- Stitzer M. L., Bickel W. K., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I. A. Effect of methadone dose contingencies on urinalysis test results of polydrug abusing methadone maintenance patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1986; 18: 341–348
- Stitzer M L., Iguchi M. Y., Felch L. J. Contingent take-home incentive: effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1992; 60: 927–934