The effects of a pre-fitting intervention on hearing aid benefit: A randomized controlled trial

References

• Dillon H. Hearing aids. Bomerang Press; Stuttgart: Thieme; 2001349–50.
   Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, . Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000; 21:S106–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson-Mangold M, Ringdahl A, Bjorklund AK, Wahlin B. The active fitting (AF) programme of hearing aids: a psychological perspective. Br J Audiol. 1990; 24:277–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rankin S, Stallings K. Patient education: principles and practice. Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2001. 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, Johnson D. Pre-issue assessment and counselling as a component of hearing aid provision. Br J Audiol. 1981; 15:13–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman M, George C, Downie A, Milligan J. Evaluation of communication course for new hearing aid users. Scand Audiol. 1995; 24:63–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro SM, Ritterman SI. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap. Ear Hear. 1992; 13:371–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams HB, Hnath-Chisolm T, McArdle R. A cost-utility analysis of adult group audiological rehabilitation: are the benefits worth the cost?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002; 39:549–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger JE. Should significant others be encouraged to join adult group audiological rehabilitation classes?. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003; 14:545–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R. Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear. 2004; 25:464–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson G, Melin L, Scott B, Lindberg P. A two-year follow-up examination of a behavioural treatment approach to hearing tactics. Br J Audiol. 1995; 29:347–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kricos PB, Holmes AE. Efficacy of audiological rehabilitation for older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 1996; 7:219–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer SE, Allessie GH, Dondorp AW, Zekveld AA, Kapeyn TS. A home education programme for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: a randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol. 2005; 44:255–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks DN. Counselling and its effect on hearing aid use. Scand Audiol. 1979; 8:101–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman M, George CR, McCarthy D. The effect of pre-fitting counselling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings. Scand Audiol. 1994; 23:257–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemker B, Holmes AE. Analysis of pre-fitting versus post-fitting hearing aid orientation using the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP). J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15:311–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling C, Vejby Hansen K. Hearing instruments: interaction with user preference. 18th Danavox Symposium Copenhagen. 1999; :341–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H, Zakis J, McDermott H, Keidser G, Dreschler W, Convery E, . The trainable hearing aid: what will it do for clients and clinicians?. Hear J. 2006; 59:306–.
   Google Scholar
• Zakis J, Dillon H, McDermott H. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters. Ear Hear. 2007; 28:812–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kricos P, Lesner S, Sandridge S. Expectations of older adults regarding the use of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1991; 2:129–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong LA, Hickson L, McPherson B. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?. Trends Amplif. 2003; 7:117–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health, WHO, Geneva; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment (3rd). Oxford University Press; New York: 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sumerall SW, Timmons PL, James AL, Ewing MJ, Oehlert ME. Expanded norms for the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. J Clin Psychol. 1997; 53:517–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein M, Folstein S, Mc Hugh P. ‘Mini-Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res. 1975; 12:189–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unravelling the mystery of health. Jossey-Bass; San Francisco: 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Öberg M, Lunner T, Andersson G. Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiol Med. 2007; 5:188–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000; 11:368–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life – the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999; 20:306–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982; 3:128–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W, Tyler R, Dunn R, Bhullar N. Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2008; 29:112–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67:361–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997; 8:27–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling C. A new digital hearing instrument. Hear Rev. 1996; 3:38–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schum D. Adaptive speech alignment: a new rationale made possible by DSP. Hear J. 1996; 49:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lunner T, Hellgren J, Arlinger S, Elberling C. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three DSP algorithms – user preference and performance. Ear Hear. 1997; 18:373–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Dillon H, Ching T, Katsch R, Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001; 12:37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öberg M, Wänström G, Hjertman H, Lunner T, Andersson G. Development and initial validation of the ‘Clinical Global Impression’ to measure outcomes for audiological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31:1409–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statsoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system),version 7. www.statsoft.com. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor KS. Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly. Ear Hear. 1993; 14:390–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinoff RL, Weinstein BE. Changes in self-assessment of hearing handicap over the first year of hearing aid use. J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 1989; 22:54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Newman CW, Hug GA, Wharton JA, Jacobson GP. The influence of hearing aid cost on perceived benefit in older adults. Ear Hear. 1993; 14:285–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif. 2005; 9:127–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1988; 9:81–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35:1402–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark P, Hickson L. Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol. 2004; 43:390–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41:30–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Dreschler WA, Boymans M, Festen JM. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41:36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol. 2002; 41:42–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English K. Get ready for the next big thing in audiological counselling. Hear J. 2005; 58:10–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1994; 15:30–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges J, Bentler R. Relating hearing aid use to well-being among older adults. Hear J. 1998; 51:39–44.
   Google Scholar