Auditory recovery and speechreading in cochlear implanted deaf patients: A review

References

• Copeland BJ, Pillsbury HC. Cochlear implantation for the treatment of deafness. Ann Rev Med. 2004;55:157–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deggouj N, Gersdorff M, Garin P, Castelein S, Gerard JM. Today's indications for cochlear implantation. B-Ent. 2007;3:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AR. History of cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:779–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressnitzer D, Bestel J, Fraysse B. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1060:343–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 1995;270:303–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C, Gilbert G, Carn H, Garnier S, Moore BC. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;5;103:18866–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:1150–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Woodworth GG, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ. Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:508–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit C, Mohamadi T, Kandel S. Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37:1195–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant KW, Braida LD. Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991;89:2952–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod A, Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol. 1987;21:131–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross LA, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt VM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:1147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby WH, Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1954;26:212–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield Q. Use of visual information for phonetic perception. Phonetica. 1979;36:314–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell R. The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:1001–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold P, Hill F. Bisensory augmentation: a speechreading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact. Br J Psychol. 2001;92:339–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg D, McLean J, Goldfield A. Easy to hear but hard to understand. Dodd B, Campbell R. Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Lip-reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987. 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein LE, Auer ET, Tucker PE. Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults? J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein LE, Demorest ME, Tucker PE. Speech perception without hearing. Percept Psychophys. 2000;62:233–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouger J, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, Deneve S, Deguine O, Barone P. Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelnikov K, Rouger J, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Barone P. Improvement in speechreading ability by auditory training: evidence from gender differences in normally-hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:972–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield Q. Lip-reading and audio-visual speech perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992;335:71–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant KW, Walden BE, Seitz PF. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:2677–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser AR, Kirk KI, Lachs L, Pisoni DB. Talker and lexical effects on audio-visual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:390–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud AL, Price CJ, Graham JM, Frackowiak RS. Functional plasticity of language related brain areas after cochlear implantation. Brain. 2001;124:1307–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud AL, Price CJ, Graham JM, Truy E, Frackowiak RS. Cross-modal plasticity underpins language recovery after cochlear implantation. Neuron. 2001;30:657–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson TR, Pisoni DB, Davis RA. Development of audio-visual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2005;26:149–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray RF, Quinn SJ, Court I, Vanat Z, Baguley DM. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995;166:275–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:3586–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson B, Nelson PB. Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:2607–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet ME, Bergeron F, Lassonde M, Ferron P, Lepore F. Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Brain. 2006;129:3376–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Bottari D, Bonora A, Ladavas E. Audio-visual integration in patients with visual deficit. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:1442–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert M, Logothetis NK, Kayser C. Improvement of visual contrast detection by a simultaneous sound. Brain Res. 2007;1173:102–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz AR, Kim R, Shams L. Sound facilitates visual learning. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1422–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruytjens L, Albers F, van Dijk P, Wit H, Willemsen A. Neural responses to silent lip-reading in normal hearing male and female subjects. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:1835–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein BE, Meredith MA. The Merging of the Senses. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein LE, Auer JET, Takayanagi S. Auditory speech detection in noise enhanced by lip-reading. Speech Communic. 2004;44:5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant KW, Seitz PF. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108:1197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Wygonski J. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:2467–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai S, Stickney G, Zeng FG. Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123:428–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschecker JP. Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SC, McGuire PK, . Activation of auditory cortex during silent lip-reading. Science. 1997;276:593–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkola J, Ojanen V, Autti T, Jaaskelainen IP, Mottonen R, Tarkiainen A, . Primary auditory cortex activation by visual speech: an fMRI study at 3T. Neuroreport. 2005;16:125–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacSweeney M, Amaro E, Calvert GA, Campbell R, David AS, McGuire P, . Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2000;11:1729–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein LE, Auer ET Jr, Moore JK, Ponton CW, Don M, Singh M. Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation. Neuroreport. 2002;13:311–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capek CM, Macsweeney M, Woll B, Waters D, McGuire PK, David AS, . Cortical circuits for silent speechreading in deaf and hearing people. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:1233–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitto LA, Zatorre RJ, Gauna K, Nikelski EJ, Dostie D, Evans AC. Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:13961–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura H, Hashikawa K, Doi K, Iwaki T, Watanabe Y, Kusuoka H, . Sign language ‘heard’ in the auditory cortex. Nature. 1999;397:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney EM, Fine I, Dobkins KR. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1171–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen MV, Mirz F, Gjedde A. Restored speech comprehension linked to activity in left inferior prefrontal and right temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness. Neuroimage. 2006;31:842–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veraart C, de Volder AG, Wanet-Defalque MC, Bol A, Michel C, Goffinet AM. Glucose utilization in human visual cortex is abnormally elevated in blindness of early onset but decreased in blindness of late onset. Brain Res. 1990;510:115–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanet-Defalque MC, Veraart C, de Volder A, Metz R, Michel C, Dooms G, . High metabolic activity in the visual cortex of early blind human subjects. Brain Res. 1988;446:369–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Lee DS, Lee MC, . Preoperative differences of cerebral metabolism relate to the outcome of cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children. Hear Res. 2005;203:2–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Kim CS, . Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:909–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchel C, Price C, Frackowiak RS, Friston K. Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain. 1998;12:409–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kujala T, Huotilainen M, Sinkkonen J, Ahonen AI, Alho K, Hamalainen MS, . Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci Lett. 1995;183:143–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Ibanez V, Deiber MP, Dold G, . Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature. 1996;380:526–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks R, Horwitz B, Aziz-Sultan A, Tian B, Wessinger CM, Cohen LG, . A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2664–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazoyer B, Zago L, Mellet E, Bricogne S, Etard O, Houde O, . Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Res Bull. 2001;54:287–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raichle ME, Snyder AZ. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage. 2007;37:1083–90, discussion 97–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giove F, Mangia S, Bianciardi M, Garreffa G, di Salle F, Morrone R, . The physiology and metabolism of neuronal activation: in vivo studies by NMR and other methods. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:1283–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser J, Chiu C, Weliky M. Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision. Nature. 2004;431:573–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenet T, Bibitchkov D, Tsodyks M, Grinvald A, Arieli A. Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes. Nature. 2003;425:954–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raichle ME, Mintun MA. Brain work and brain imaging. Ann Rev Neuroscience. 2006;29:449–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelnikov K. Can mismatch negativity be linked to synaptic processes? A glutamatergic approach to deviance detection. Brain Cognit. 2007;18:244–51.
   Google Scholar
• Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:685–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelnikov K, Rouger J, Demonet JF, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, Deguine O, . Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear implantation. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Oct 5: In press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito K, Momose T, Oku S, Ishimoto S, Yamasoba T, Sugasawa M, . Cortical activation shortly after cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004;9:282–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:393–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demonet JF, Chollet F, Ramsay S, Cardebat D, Nespoulous JL, Wise R, . The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain. 1992;115:1753–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Herve PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, Houde O, . Meta-analysing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage. 2006;30:1414–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness. Hear Res. 2005;205:184–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, Oh SH, Kang H, Kim CS, . Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:909–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, Kim SK, Kim JW, Chung JK, . Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature. 2001;409:149–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS. Investigating a network model of word generation with positron emission tomography. Proc Biol Sci. 1991;244:101–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar