Molecular toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles to the freshwater alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is associated with supra-environmental exposure concentrations

References

• Ankley GT, Daston GP, Degitz SJ, Denslow ND, Hoke RA, Kennedy SW, et al. 2006. Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Technol 40:4055–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, et al. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:730–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baalousha M, Lead JL. 2012. Rationalizing nanomaterial sizes measured by atomic force microscopy, flow field-flow fractionation and dynamic light scattering: sample preparation, polydispersity and particle structure. Environ Sci Technol 46:6134–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baalousha M, Ju-Nam Y, Cole PA, Gaiser B, Fernandes TF, Hriljac JA, et al. 2012a. Characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles – part 1: size measurements. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:983–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baalousha M, Ju-Nam Y, Cole PA, Gaiser B, Fernandes TF, Hriljac JA. 2012b. Characterization of cerium oxide nanoparticles – part 2: nonsize measurements. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:994–1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, et al. 2007. Current and Future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Central Science Laboratory Report for Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK
   Google Scholar
• Cassee FR, Van Balen EC, Singh C, Green D, Muijser H, Weinstein J, et al. 2011. Exposure, health and ecological effects review of engineered nanoscale cerium and cerium oxide associated with its use as a fuel additive. Crit Rev Toxicol 41:213–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celardo I, Pedersen JZ, Traversa E, Ghibelli L. 2011. Pharmacological potential of ceium oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 3:1411–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evseeva T, Geras’kin S, Majstrenko T, Brown J, Belykh E. 2010. Comparative estimation of 232Th and stable Ce(III) toxicity and detoxification pathways in freshwater alga Chlorella vulgaris. Chemosphere 81:1320–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fall M, Guerbet M, Park B, Gouriou F, Dionnet F, Morin J. 2007. Evaluation of cerium oxide and cerium oxide based fuel additive safety on organotypic cultures of lung slices. Nanotoxicology 1:227–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassellöv M, Readman JW, Ranville JF, Tiede K. 2008. Nanoparticle analysis and characterization in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:344–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR. 2011. Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:2562–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshino T, Kurata Y, Terasaki Y, Susa K. 2001. Mechanism of polishing of SiO2 films by CeO2 particles. J Non-Cryst Solids 283:129–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamers A, Blust R, De Coen W, Griffin JL, Jones OAH. 2013. Copper toxicity in the microalga Chlaydomonas reinhardtii: an integrated approach. Biometals 26:731–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AC, Park B. 2012. Predicting contamination by the fuel additive cerium oxide engineered nanoparticles within the United Kingdom and the associated risks. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2582–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RH, Lyon DY, et al. 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: behaviour, fate bioavailability and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim S, Choi J. 2009. Genotoxicity and ecotoxicity assays using the freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna and the larva of the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius to screen the ecological risks of nanoparticle exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 28:86–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry GV, Espinasse BP, Badireddy AR, Richardson CJ, Reinsch BC, Bryant LD, et al. 2012. Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. Environ Sci Technol 46:7027–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madl AK, Pinkerton KE. 2009. Health effects of inhaled engineered and incidental nanoparticles. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:629–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, et al. 2006. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield RC, Wang ZW, Palmer RE, Lead JR. 2013. Synthesis and characterisation of polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 47:12426–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao A-J, et al. 2008. Environmental behaviour and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants and fungi. Ecotoxicology 17:372–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No 201, Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France
   Google Scholar
• Park B, Donaldson K, Duffin R, Tran L, Kelly F, Mudway I, et al. 2008a. Hazard and risk assessment of a nanoparticulate cerium-oxide based diesel fuel additive – A case study. Inhal Toxicol 20:547–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Choi J, Park Y, Park K. 2008b. Oxidative stress induced by cerium oxide nanoparticles in cultured BEAS-2B cells. Toxicology 245:90–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier DA, Suresh AK, Holton GA, McKeown CK, Wang W, Gu B, et al. 2010. Effects of engineered cerium oxide nanoparticles on bacterial growth and viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7981–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poma A, Di Giorgio ML. 2008. Toxicogenomics to improve comprehension of the mechanisms underlying responses of in vitro and in vivo systems to nanomaterials: a review. Curr Genomics 9:571–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poynton HC, Lazorchak JM, Impellitteri CA, Blalock BJ, Rogers K, Allen HJ, et al. 2012. Toxicogenomic responses of nanotoxicity in Daphnia magna exposed to silver nitrate and coated silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 46:6288–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers NJ, Franklin NM, Apte SA, Batley GE, Angel BM, Lead JR, et al. 2010. Physico-chemical behaviour and algal toxicity of nanoparticulate CeO2 in freshwater. Environ Chem 7:50–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodea-Palomares I, Boltes K, Fernández-Pinas F, Leganés F, García-Calvo E, Santiago J, et al. 2011. Physicochemical characterization and ecotoxicological assessment of CeO2 nanoparticles using two aquatic microorganisms. Toxicol Sci 119:135–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodea-Palomares I, Gonzalo S, Santiago-Morales J, Leganés F, García-Calvo E, Rosal R, et al. 2012. An insight into the mechanisms of nanoceria toxicity in aquatic photosynthetic organisms. Aquat Toxicol 122:133–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton A, Tran L, Aitken R, Donaldson K. 2010. Nanoparticles, human health hazard and regualtion. J R Soc Interface 7:S119–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah V, Shas S, Shah H, Rispoli FJ, McDonnell KT, Workeneh S, et al. 2012. Antibacterial activity of polymer coated cerium oxide nanoparticles. Plos One 7:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Simon DF, Domingos RF, Hauser C, Hutchins CM, Zerges W, Wilkinson KJ. 2013. Transcriptome sequencing of the effects of metal nanoparticle exposure on the transcriptome of Chlaydomonas reinhardtii. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4744–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape JR, Maund SJ, Pickford DB, Hutchinson TH. 2004. Ecotoxicogenomics: the challenge of integrating genomics into aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology. Aquat Toxicol 67:143–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla SJ, Boobis AR, FitzGerald RE, Hoeng J, Kavlock RJ, Schirmer K, et al. 2014. Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol 27:314–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejamaya M, Römer I, Merrifield RC, Lead JL. 2012. Stability of citrate, PVP and PEG coated silver nanoparticles in ecotoxicology media. Environ Sci Technol 46:7011–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thill A, Zeyons O, Spalla O, Chauvat F, Rose J, Auffan M, et al. 2006. Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ Sci Technol 40:6151–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede K, Hassellöv M, Breitbarth E, Chaudry Q, Boxall ABA. 2009. Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A 1216:503–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsyusko OV, Unrine JM, Spurgeon D, Blalock BJ, Starnes D, Tseng M. 2012. Toxicogenomic responses of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans to gold nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 46:4115–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoecke K, Quik JTK, Mankiewicz-Boczek J, De Schamphelaere KAC, Elsaesser A, Ven Der Meeren P, et al. 2009. Fate and effects of CeO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ. Sci Technol 43:4537–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz DC, Belanger S, Embry M, Padilla S, Sanderson H, Schimer K, et al. 2011. Adverse outcome pathways during early fish development: a conceptual framework for identification of chemical screening and prioritization strategies. Toxicol Sci 123:349–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, Shi H, et al. 2008. Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 10:2121–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, He X, Zhang Z, Zhang P, Li Y, Ma Y, et al. 2011. Nano-CeO(2) exhibits adverse effects at environmental relevant concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 45:3725–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar