Translocation of differently sized and charged polystyrene nanoparticles in in vitro intestinal cell models of increasing complexity

References

• Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. 2009. Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:428–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL, Anderson NG. 2002. The human plasma proteome – history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:845–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabeu P, Caprani A. 1990. Influence of surface-charge on adsorption of fibrinogen and or albumin on a rotating-disk electrode of platinum and carbon. Biomaterials 11:258–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Ershov D, Gucht J, Alink GM, Rietjens IM, Zuilhof H, et al. 2013. Surface charge-specific cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of tri-block copolymer nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 7:71–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester H, Poortman J, Peters RJ, Wijma E, Kramer E, Makama S, et al. 2011. Characterization of translocation of silver nanoparticles and effects on whole-genome gene expression using an in vitro intestinal epithelium coculture model. ACS Nano 5:4091–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, et al. 2008. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 25:241–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XM, Elisia I, Kitts DD. 2010. Defining conditions for the co-culture of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells using Taguchi design. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 61:334–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho WS, Thielbeer F, Duffin R, Johansson EMV, Megson IL, MacNee W, et al. 2014. Surface functionalization affects the zeta potential, coronal stability and membranolytic activity of polymeric nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 8:202–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• des Rieux A, Fievez V, Theate I, Mast J, Preat V, Schneider YJ. 2007. An improved in vitro model of human intestinal follicle-associated epithelium to study nanoparticle transport by M cells. Eur J Pharm Sci 30:380–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• des Rieux A, Ragnarsson EG, Gullberg E, Preat V, Schneider YJ, Artursson P. 2005. Transport of nanoparticles across an in vitro model of the human intestinal follicle associated epithelium. Eur J Pharm Sci 25:455–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA, Committee ES. 2011. Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J 9:2140–76
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg MS, Friedman AE, Finkelstein JN, Oberdorster G, McGrath JL. 2009. The influence of protein adsorption on nanoparticle association with cultured endothelial cells. Biomaterials 30:603–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbakry A, Wurster EC, Zaky A, Liebl R, Schindler E, Bauer-Kreisel P, et al. 2012. Layer-by-layer coated gold nanoparticles: size-dependent delivery of DNA into cells. Small 8:3847–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazlollahi F, Angelow S, Yacobi NR, Marchelletta R, Yu AS, Hamm-Alvarez SF, et al. 2011. Polystyrene nanoparticle trafficking across MDCK-II. Nanomed: Nanotechnol, Biol Med 7:588–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischer CC, Payne CK. 2012. Nanoparticle surface charge mediates the cellular receptors used by protein-nanoparticle complexes. J Phys Chem B 116:8901–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessner A, Lieske A, Paulke BR, Muller RH. 2003. Functional groups on polystyrene model nanoparticles: influence on protein adsorption. J Biomed Mater Res A 65A:319–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gref R, Luck M, Quellec P, Marchand M, Dellacherie E, Harnisch S, et al. 2000. ‘Stealth’ corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. Colloids Surf B, Biointerfaces 18:301–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgendorf C, Spahn-Langguth H, Regardh CG, Lipka E, Amidon GL, Langguth P. 2000. Caco-2 versus Caco-2/HT29-MTX co-cultured cell lines: permeabilities via diffusion, inside- and outside-directed carrier-mediated transport. J Pharm Sci 89:63–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain N, Jaitley V, Florence AT. 2001. Recent advances in the understanding of uptake of microparticulates across the gastrointestinal lymphatics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 50:107–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlovszky-Hajdu A, Bombelli FB, Monopoli MP, Tombacz E, Dawson KA. 2012. Surface coatings shape the protein corona of SPIONs with relevance to their application in vivo. Langmuir 28:14983–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai SK, O’Hanlon DE, Harrold S, Man ST, Wang YY, Cone R, et al. 2007. Rapid transport of large polymeric nanoparticles in fresh undiluted human mucus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1482–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Hoshino Y, Randall A, Zeng ZY, Baldi P, Doong RA, et al. 2012. Engineered synthetic polymer nanoparticles as IgG affinity ligands. J Am Chem Soc 134:15765–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesniak A, Campbell A, Monopoli MP, Lynch I, Salvati A, Dawson KA. 2010. Serum heat inactivation affects protein corona composition and nanoparticle uptake. Biomaterials 31:9511–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist M. 2013. Nanoparticles: tracking protein corona over time. Nat Nanotechnol 8:701–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Cedervall T, Berggard T, Flanagan MB, Lynch I, et al. 2011. The evolution of the protein corona around nanoparticles: a test study. ACS Nano 5:7503–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, Lynch I, Cedervall T, Dawson KA. 2008. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14265–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler GJ, Esch MB, Tako E, Southard TL, Archer SD, Glahn RP, et al. 2012. Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles affects iron absorption. Nat Nanotechnol 7:264–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meder F, Daberkow T, Treccani L, Wilhelm M, Schowalter M, Rosenauer A, et al. 2012. Protein adsorption on colloidal alumina particles functionalized with amino, carboxyl, sulfonate and phosphate groups. Acta Biomater 8:1221–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB, et al. 2011. Physical-chemical aspects of protein corona: relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 133:2525–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkabinde LA, Shoba-Zikhali LNN, Semete-Makokotlela B, Kalombo L, Swai HS, Hayeshi R, et al. 2012. Permeation of PLGA nanoparticles across different in vitro models. Curr Drug Deliv 9:617–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nollevaux G, Deville C, El Moualij B, Zorzi W, Deloyer P, Schneider YJ, et al. 2006. Development of a serum-free co-culture of human intestinal epithelium cell-lines (Caco-2/HT29-5M21). BMC Cell Biol 7:20–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris DA, Puri N, Sinko PJ. 1998. The effect of physical barriers and properties on the oral absorption of particulates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 34:135–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh E, Delehanty JB, Sapsford KE, Susumu K, Goswami R, Blanco-Canosa JB, et al. 2011. Cellular uptake and fate of PEGylated gold nanoparticles is dependent on both cell-penetration peptides and particle size. ACS Nano 5:6434–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen AG, Bos PM, Fernandes TF, Hund-Rinke K, Boraschi D, Byrne HJ, et al. 2014. Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10. Nanotoxicology 8:334–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi D, Colapicchioni V, Caracciolo G, Piovesana S, Capriotti AL, Palchetti S, et al. 2014. Effect of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) chain length on the bio-nano-interactions between PEGylated lipid nanoparticles and biological fluids: from nanostructure to uptake in cancer cells. Nanoscale 6:2782–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prijic S, Prosen L, Cemazar M, Scancar J, Romih R, Lavrencak J, et al. 2012. Surface modified magnetic nanoparticles for immuno-gene therapy of murine mammary adenocarcinoma. Biomaterials 33:4379–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothen-Rutishauser B, Riesen FK, Braun A, Gunthert M, Wunderli-Allenspach H. 2002. Dynamics of tight and adherens junctions under EGTA treatment. J Membr Biol 188:151–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubbe S, Schumann C, Cavelius C, Koch M, Muller T, Kraegeloh A. 2012. Size-dependent localization and quantitative evaluation of the intracellular migration of silica nanoparticles in Caco-2 cells. Chem Mater 24:914–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang L, Nienhaus K, Nienhaus GU. 2014. Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters. J Nanobiotechnol 12:5–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma B, Peetla C, Adjei IM, Labhasetwar V. 2013. Selective biophysical interactions of surface modified nanoparticles with cancer cell lipids improve tumor targeting and gene therapy. Cancer Lett 334:228–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szentkuti L. 1997. Light microscopical observations on luminally administered dyes, dextrans, nanospheres and microspheres in the pre-epithelial mucus gel layer of the rat distal colon. J Control Release 46:233–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedja R, Lim M, Amal R, Marquis C. 2012. Effects of serum adsorption on cellular uptake profile and consequent impact of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on human lung cell lines. ACS Nano 6:4083–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela JA, Bexiga MG, Aberg C, Simpson JC, Dawson KA. 2012. Quantifying size-dependent interactions between fluorescently labeled polystyrene nanoparticles and mammalian cells. J Nanobiotechnol 10:39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczak AP, Fokkink R, Peters R, Tromp P, Herrera Rivera ZE, Rietjens IM, et al. 2013. Behaviour of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in an in vitro human gastrointestinal digestion model. Nanotoxicology 7:1198–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter E, Janich S, Roessler BJ, Hilfinger JM, Amidon GL. 1996. HT29-MTX/Caco-2 cocultures as an in vitro model for the intestinal epithelium: in vitro in vivo correlation with permeability data from rats and humans. J Pharm Sci 85:1070–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang ZX, Kang SG, Zhou RH. 2014. Nanomedicine: de novo design of nanodrugs. Nanoscale 6:663–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoncheva K, Gomez S, Campanero MA, Gamazo C, Irache JM. 2005. Bioadhesive properties of pegylated nanoparticles. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2:205–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Y, Sun X, Zhang G, Trewyn BG, Slowing, II, Lin VS. 2011. Interaction of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with human red blood cell membranes: size and surface effects. ACS Nano 5:1366–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar