How important is drinking water exposure for the risks of engineered nanoparticles to consumers?

References

• Blaser SA, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Hungerbühler K. 2008. Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Sci Total Environ 390:396–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C. 2007a. Current and predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. York: CSL. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=CB01098_6270_FRP.pdf. Accessed on 5 December 2014
   Google Scholar
• Boxall ABA, Tiede K, Chaudhry Q. 2007b. Engineered nanomaterials in soils and water: how do they behave and could they pose a risk to human health. Nanomedicine 2:919–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall ABA, Rudd MA, Brooks BW, Caldwell DJ, Choi K, Hickmann S, et al. 2012. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the key questions? Environ Health Persp 120:1221–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP). 2006. Guideline on the environmental assessment of medicinal products for human use. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00. London, UK: EMEA (European Medicines Agency). Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/10/WC500003978.pdf. Accessed on 10 March 2015
   Google Scholar
• EMEA. 2006. Note for guidance on environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. CPMP/SWP/4447/00. London, UK: EMEA. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/10/WC500003978.pdf. Accessed on 5 December 2014
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Bureau. 2003. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Eurpean Commission: Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC for new notified substances. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960216/tgdpart2_2ed_en.pdf. Accessed on 10 March 2015
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk F, Ort C, Scholz RW, Nowack B. 2011. Engineered nanomaterials in rivers – exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution. Environ Pollut 159:3439–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B. 2010. Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Model Software 25:320–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B. 2009. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SF, Baun A, Michelson ES, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer-Lauridsen F. 2008a. Nanomaterials in consumer products: categorization and exposure assessment. In Linkov I, Steevens J, eds. Nanotechnology Risks and Benefits. Dordrecht: Springer, 363–72
   Google Scholar
• Hansen SF, Michelson ES, Kamper A, Borling P, Lauridsen FS, Baun A. 2008b. Categorisation framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products. Ecotoxicology 17:438–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SF, Larsen BH, Olsen SI, Baun A. 2007. Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 1:243–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AC, Bowesa MJ, Crossley A, Jarviea HP, Jurkschat K, Jürgens MD, et al. 2011. An assessment of the fate, behaviour and environmental risk associated with sunscreen TiO2 nanoparticles in UK field scenarios. Sci Total Environ 409:2503–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AC, Park B. 2011. Predicting contamination by the fuel additive cerium oxide engineered nanoparticles within the United Kingdom and the associated risks. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2582–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine JM, Vial D, Moulart P. (2000). Status after 10 years of operation – overview of UF technology today. Desalination 131:17–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbach LK, Reiter R, Muller E, Krebs R, Galli R, Stark WJ. 2008. Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 42:5828–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, et al. 2006. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller NC, Nowack B. 2008. Exposure modelling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musee N. 2012. Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City. Hum Exp Toxicol 30:1181–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishijima W, Okada M. 1998. Particle separation as a pre-treatment of an advanced drinking water treatment process by ozonation and biological activated carbon. Water Sci Technol 37:117–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien NJ, Cummins EJ. 2010. Nano-scale pollutants: fate in Irish surface and drinking water regulatory systems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16:847–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Melia CR. 1980. Aquasols – the behavior of small particles in aquatic systems. Environ Sci Technol 14:1052–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OFWAT (The Water Services Regulation Authority). 2007. International comparison of water and sewerage service 2007 report: Covering the period 2004–2005. Birmingham, UK. Available at: http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/regulating/casework/reporting/rpt_int2007.pdf. Accessed on 10 March 2015
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius A, Scheringer M, Hungerbuhler K. 2012. Development of environmental fate models for engineered nanoparticles – a case study of TiO2 nanoparticles in the Rhine river. Environ Sci Technol 46:6705–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauscher H, Roebben G. 2014. Towards a review of the EC Recommendation for a definition of the term “nanomaterial” – part 1: compilation of information concerning the experience with the definition. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC89369/lbna26567enn.pdf. Accessed on 30 January 2015
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, UK. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, July 2004. Available at: www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm. Accessed on 5 December 2014
   Google Scholar
• Schafer AI, Schwicker U, Fischer MM, Fane AG, Waite TD. 2000. Microfiltration of colloids and natural organic matter. J Membr Sci 171:151–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede K, Hassellov M, Breitbarth E, Chaudhry Q, Boxall ABA. 2009. Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A 1216:503–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Shang C, Westerhoff P. 2010. Quantification of fullerene aggregate nC60 in wastewater by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV-Vis spectroscopic and mass spectrometric detection. Chemosphere 80:334–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhoff P, Song G, Hristovski K, Kiser MA. 2011. Occurrence and removal of titanium at full scale wastewater treatment plants: implications for TiO2 nanomaterials. J Environ Monit 13:1195–203
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven SWP, Dekkers S, Hagens WI, de Jong WH. 2009. Exposure to nanomaterials in consumer products, RIVM Letter Report 340370001/2009. Bilthoven: RIVM
   Google Scholar
• Wu M, Wang M, Ge M. 2009. Investigation into the performance and mechanism of SiO2 nanoparticles and starch composite films. J Textile Inst 100:254–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuasa A. 1998. Drinking water production by coagulation-microfiltration and adsorption-ultrafiltration. Water Sci Technol 37:135–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar